制定质量指标,以评估性发育差异(DSD)患者的护理质量。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Martina Jürgensen, Marion Rapp, Maike Schnoor, Andreas Heidenreich, Ulla Döhnert, Jannick Scherf, Olaf Hiort, Alexander Katalinic
{"title":"制定质量指标,以评估性发育差异(DSD)患者的护理质量。","authors":"Martina Jürgensen, Marion Rapp, Maike Schnoor, Andreas Heidenreich, Ulla Döhnert, Jannick Scherf, Olaf Hiort, Alexander Katalinic","doi":"10.1159/000540596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving evidence-based, high-quality medical care is the overarching goal of healthcare quality management. Quality indicators (QIs) serve as proxies to show whether good quality is reached or not. This article describes the development of QI for the evaluation of healthcare quality in the area of differences of sex development (DSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the model of Donabedian, the aim was to develop QI to assess defined relevant aspects of the quality of structures, processes, and outcomes of care in DSD. Ten DSD clinical centres and two self-advocacy groups in Germany included in the DSDCare project were involved in the development of the QI and a benchmarking system. The development of the QI involved several structured steps: analysis of guidelines and recommendations, literature review, qualitative interviews with key stakeholders in the field of DSD, and patients or their carers. QIs were discussed in a multi-stage systematic consensus process and assessed in terms of their relevance, feasibility, and practicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a multi-stage systematic consensus process involving medical and psychological experts from a range of disciplines, people with DSD and their families, and representatives of self-advocacy groups, we have developed a set of 37 QIs (22 structure, seven process, and eight outcome quality). The QIs serve to evaluate care in the field of DSD and may add to the German criteria for certification of Centres for Rare Conditions formulated by the National Action League for People with Rare Diseases (NAMSE) in this area of expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have succeeded in developing and jointly adopting a set of QIs that consider a wide range of perspectives on the quality of care for people with DSD and their families. These QIs have been found to be relevant, feasible, and practicable, and they are now used for a yearly quality benchmarking in the participating DSD centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":13025,"journal":{"name":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Quality Indicators to Evaluate the Quality of Care for People with Differences of Sex Development.\",\"authors\":\"Martina Jürgensen, Marion Rapp, Maike Schnoor, Andreas Heidenreich, Ulla Döhnert, Jannick Scherf, Olaf Hiort, Alexander Katalinic\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving evidence-based, high-quality medical care is the overarching goal of healthcare quality management. Quality indicators (QIs) serve as proxies to show whether good quality is reached or not. This article describes the development of QI for the evaluation of healthcare quality in the area of differences of sex development (DSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the model of Donabedian, the aim was to develop QI to assess defined relevant aspects of the quality of structures, processes, and outcomes of care in DSD. Ten DSD clinical centres and two self-advocacy groups in Germany included in the DSDCare project were involved in the development of the QI and a benchmarking system. The development of the QI involved several structured steps: analysis of guidelines and recommendations, literature review, qualitative interviews with key stakeholders in the field of DSD, and patients or their carers. QIs were discussed in a multi-stage systematic consensus process and assessed in terms of their relevance, feasibility, and practicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a multi-stage systematic consensus process involving medical and psychological experts from a range of disciplines, people with DSD and their families, and representatives of self-advocacy groups, we have developed a set of 37 QIs (22 structure, seven process, and eight outcome quality). The QIs serve to evaluate care in the field of DSD and may add to the German criteria for certification of Centres for Rare Conditions formulated by the National Action League for People with Rare Diseases (NAMSE) in this area of expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have succeeded in developing and jointly adopting a set of QIs that consider a wide range of perspectives on the quality of care for people with DSD and their families. These QIs have been found to be relevant, feasible, and practicable, and they are now used for a yearly quality benchmarking in the participating DSD centres.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hormone Research in Paediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hormone Research in Paediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540596\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 实现循证、高质量的医疗服务是医疗质量管理的首要目标。质量指标(QI)是显示是否达到高质量的代用指标。本文介绍了在性发育差异(DSD)领域开发用于评估医疗质量的 QI 的情况。方法 按照 Donabedian 的模式,目的是开发 QI,以评估 DSD 医疗结构、过程和结果质量的相关方面。德国的十个 DSD 临床中心和两个自发组织参与了 DSDCare 项目,并参与了 QI 和基准系统的开发。该 QI 的开发涉及多个结构化步骤:分析指南和建议、文献综述、与 DSD 领域的主要利益相关者和患者或其护理者进行定性访谈。在多阶段系统性共识过程中讨论了量化指标,并对其相关性、可行性和实用性进行了评估。结果 通过多阶段系统性共识过程,我们制定了一套 37 项 QI(22 项结构性 QI、7 项过程性 QI 和 8 项结果质量 QI),参与人员包括来自不同学科的医学和心理学专家、DSD 患者及其家属以及自我倡导团体的代表。这些质量指标用于评估 DSD 领域的护理工作,并可作为德国罕见疾病中心认证标准的补充,该认证标准是由全国罕见疾病患者行动联盟 (NAMSE) 在这一专业领域制定的。结论 我们成功地制定并共同采用了一套质量指标,这些指标从广泛的角度考虑了对 DSD 患者及其家人的护理质量。这些质量指标被认为是相关、可行和切实可行的,目前已被用于参与的 DSD 中心的年度质量基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Quality Indicators to Evaluate the Quality of Care for People with Differences of Sex Development.

Introduction: Achieving evidence-based, high-quality medical care is the overarching goal of healthcare quality management. Quality indicators (QIs) serve as proxies to show whether good quality is reached or not. This article describes the development of QI for the evaluation of healthcare quality in the area of differences of sex development (DSD).

Methods: Following the model of Donabedian, the aim was to develop QI to assess defined relevant aspects of the quality of structures, processes, and outcomes of care in DSD. Ten DSD clinical centres and two self-advocacy groups in Germany included in the DSDCare project were involved in the development of the QI and a benchmarking system. The development of the QI involved several structured steps: analysis of guidelines and recommendations, literature review, qualitative interviews with key stakeholders in the field of DSD, and patients or their carers. QIs were discussed in a multi-stage systematic consensus process and assessed in terms of their relevance, feasibility, and practicability.

Results: In a multi-stage systematic consensus process involving medical and psychological experts from a range of disciplines, people with DSD and their families, and representatives of self-advocacy groups, we have developed a set of 37 QIs (22 structure, seven process, and eight outcome quality). The QIs serve to evaluate care in the field of DSD and may add to the German criteria for certification of Centres for Rare Conditions formulated by the National Action League for People with Rare Diseases (NAMSE) in this area of expertise.

Conclusion: We have succeeded in developing and jointly adopting a set of QIs that consider a wide range of perspectives on the quality of care for people with DSD and their families. These QIs have been found to be relevant, feasible, and practicable, and they are now used for a yearly quality benchmarking in the participating DSD centres.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hormone Research in Paediatrics
Hormone Research in Paediatrics ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of ''Hormone Research in Paediatrics'' is to improve the care of children with endocrine disorders by promoting basic and clinical knowledge. The journal facilitates the dissemination of information through original papers, mini reviews, clinical guidelines and papers on novel insights from clinical practice. Periodic editorials from outstanding paediatric endocrinologists address the main published novelties by critically reviewing the major strengths and weaknesses of the studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信