口服甲氨蝶呤减轻膝骨关节炎疼痛:随机安慰剂对照临床试验。

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.7326/M24-0303
Sarah R Kingsbury, Puvan Tharmanathan, Ada Keding, Fiona E Watt, David L Scott, Edward Roddy, Fraser Birrell, Nigel K Arden, Mike Bowes, Catherine Arundel, Michelle Watson, Sarah J Ronaldson, Catherine Hewitt, Michael Doherty, Robert J Moots, Terence W O'Neill, Michael Green, Gulam Patel, Toby Garrood, Christopher J Edwards, Phil J Walmsley, Tom Sheeran, David J Torgerson, Philip G Conaghan
{"title":"口服甲氨蝶呤减轻膝骨关节炎疼痛:随机安慰剂对照临床试验。","authors":"Sarah R Kingsbury, Puvan Tharmanathan, Ada Keding, Fiona E Watt, David L Scott, Edward Roddy, Fraser Birrell, Nigel K Arden, Mike Bowes, Catherine Arundel, Michelle Watson, Sarah J Ronaldson, Catherine Hewitt, Michael Doherty, Robert J Moots, Terence W O'Neill, Michael Green, Gulam Patel, Toby Garrood, Christopher J Edwards, Phil J Walmsley, Tom Sheeran, David J Torgerson, Philip G Conaghan","doi":"10.7326/M24-0303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) are limited. Previous small studies suggest that the antirheumatic drug methotrexate may be a potential treatment for OA pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess symptomatic benefits of methotrexate in knee OA (KOA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done between 13 June 2014 and 13 October 2017. (ISRCTN77854383; EudraCT: 2013-001689-41).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>15 secondary care musculoskeletal clinics in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 207 participants with symptomatic, radiographic KOA and knee pain (severity ≥4 out of 10) on most days in the past 3 months with inadequate response to current medication were approached for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral methotrexate once weekly (6-week escalation 10 to 25 mg) or matched placebo over 12 months and continued usual analgesia.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary end point was average knee pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] 0 to 10) at 6 months, with 12-month follow-up to assess longer-term response. Secondary end points included knee stiffness and function outcomes and adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 155 participants (64% women; mean age, 60.9 years; 50% Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 to 4) were randomly assigned to methotrexate (<i>n</i> = 77) or placebo (<i>n</i> = 78). Follow-up was 86% (<i>n</i> = 134; methotrexate: 66, placebo: 68) at 6 months. Mean knee pain decreased from 6.4 (SD, 1.80) at baseline to 5.1 (SD, 2.32) at 6 months in the methotrexate group and from 6.8 (SD, 1.62) to 6.2 (SD, 2.30) in the placebo group. The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed a statistically significant pain reduction of 0.79 NRS points in favor of methotrexate (95% CI, 0.08 to 1.51; <i>P</i> = 0.030). There were also statistically significant treatment group differences in favor of methotrexate at 6 months for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (0.60 points [CI, 0.01 to 1.18]; <i>P</i> = 0.045) and function (5.01 points [CI, 1.29 to 8.74]; <i>P</i> = 0.008). Treatment adherence analysis supported a dose-response effect. Four unrelated serious AEs were reported (methotrexate: 2, placebo: 2).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Not permitting oral methotrexate to be changed to subcutaneous delivery for intolerance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral methotrexate added to usual medications demonstrated statistically significant reduction in KOA pain, stiffness, and function at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>Versus Arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Reduction With Oral Methotrexate in Knee Osteoarthritis : A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah R Kingsbury, Puvan Tharmanathan, Ada Keding, Fiona E Watt, David L Scott, Edward Roddy, Fraser Birrell, Nigel K Arden, Mike Bowes, Catherine Arundel, Michelle Watson, Sarah J Ronaldson, Catherine Hewitt, Michael Doherty, Robert J Moots, Terence W O'Neill, Michael Green, Gulam Patel, Toby Garrood, Christopher J Edwards, Phil J Walmsley, Tom Sheeran, David J Torgerson, Philip G Conaghan\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/M24-0303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) are limited. Previous small studies suggest that the antirheumatic drug methotrexate may be a potential treatment for OA pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess symptomatic benefits of methotrexate in knee OA (KOA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done between 13 June 2014 and 13 October 2017. (ISRCTN77854383; EudraCT: 2013-001689-41).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>15 secondary care musculoskeletal clinics in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 207 participants with symptomatic, radiographic KOA and knee pain (severity ≥4 out of 10) on most days in the past 3 months with inadequate response to current medication were approached for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral methotrexate once weekly (6-week escalation 10 to 25 mg) or matched placebo over 12 months and continued usual analgesia.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary end point was average knee pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] 0 to 10) at 6 months, with 12-month follow-up to assess longer-term response. Secondary end points included knee stiffness and function outcomes and adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 155 participants (64% women; mean age, 60.9 years; 50% Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 to 4) were randomly assigned to methotrexate (<i>n</i> = 77) or placebo (<i>n</i> = 78). Follow-up was 86% (<i>n</i> = 134; methotrexate: 66, placebo: 68) at 6 months. Mean knee pain decreased from 6.4 (SD, 1.80) at baseline to 5.1 (SD, 2.32) at 6 months in the methotrexate group and from 6.8 (SD, 1.62) to 6.2 (SD, 2.30) in the placebo group. The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed a statistically significant pain reduction of 0.79 NRS points in favor of methotrexate (95% CI, 0.08 to 1.51; <i>P</i> = 0.030). There were also statistically significant treatment group differences in favor of methotrexate at 6 months for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (0.60 points [CI, 0.01 to 1.18]; <i>P</i> = 0.045) and function (5.01 points [CI, 1.29 to 8.74]; <i>P</i> = 0.008). Treatment adherence analysis supported a dose-response effect. Four unrelated serious AEs were reported (methotrexate: 2, placebo: 2).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Not permitting oral methotrexate to be changed to subcutaneous delivery for intolerance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral methotrexate added to usual medications demonstrated statistically significant reduction in KOA pain, stiffness, and function at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>Versus Arthritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/M24-0303\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/M24-0303","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨关节炎(OA)的治疗方法有限。以往的小型研究表明,抗风湿药物甲氨蝶呤可能是治疗 OA 疼痛的一种潜在疗法:评估甲氨蝶呤对膝关节 OA(KOA)症状的益处:2014年6月13日至2017年10月13日期间进行的一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。(ISRCTN77854383;EudraCT:2013-001689-41):参与者:英国 15 家二级医疗机构的肌肉骨骼诊所:共有207名参与者在过去3个月中的大多数日子里出现无症状、放射性KOA和膝关节疼痛(严重程度≥4(满分10分)),且对当前药物治疗反应不佳:参与者按1:1随机分配到每周一次口服甲氨蝶呤(6周递增10至25毫克)或匹配的安慰剂,为期12个月,并继续接受常规镇痛治疗:主要终点是6个月时的平均膝关节疼痛(数字评分量表[NRS] 0至10),并进行12个月的随访以评估长期反应。次要终点包括膝关节僵硬和功能结果以及不良事件(AEs):共有155名参与者(64%为女性;平均年龄60.9岁;50%为Kellgren-Lawrence 3至4级)被随机分配到甲氨蝶呤(n = 77)或安慰剂(n = 78)中。6个月的随访率为86%(n = 134;甲氨蝶呤:66;安慰剂:68)。甲氨蝶呤组膝关节疼痛的平均值从基线时的6.4(标度,1.80)降至6个月时的5.1(标度,2.32),安慰剂组从6.8(标度,1.62)降至6.2(标度,2.30)。主要意向治疗分析显示,甲氨蝶呤治疗组的疼痛明显减轻了 0.79 个 NRS 点(95% CI,0.08 至 1.51;P = 0.030)。在6个月时,西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数僵硬度(0.60点[CI,0.01至1.18];P = 0.045)和功能(5.01点[CI,1.29至8.74];P = 0.008)的治疗组差异也有统计学意义,有利于甲氨蝶呤。治疗依从性分析支持剂量反应效应。报告了四例无关的严重AEs(甲氨蝶呤:2例,安慰剂:2例):局限性:不允许在不耐受的情况下将口服甲氨蝶呤改为皮下注射:结论:在常规药物基础上口服甲氨蝶呤,6 个月后,KOA 疼痛、僵硬和功能明显减轻:主要资金来源:Versus Arthritis。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain Reduction With Oral Methotrexate in Knee Osteoarthritis : A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background: Treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) are limited. Previous small studies suggest that the antirheumatic drug methotrexate may be a potential treatment for OA pain.

Objective: To assess symptomatic benefits of methotrexate in knee OA (KOA).

Design: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done between 13 June 2014 and 13 October 2017. (ISRCTN77854383; EudraCT: 2013-001689-41).

Setting: 15 secondary care musculoskeletal clinics in the United Kingdom.

Participants: A total of 207 participants with symptomatic, radiographic KOA and knee pain (severity ≥4 out of 10) on most days in the past 3 months with inadequate response to current medication were approached for inclusion.

Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral methotrexate once weekly (6-week escalation 10 to 25 mg) or matched placebo over 12 months and continued usual analgesia.

Measurements: The primary end point was average knee pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] 0 to 10) at 6 months, with 12-month follow-up to assess longer-term response. Secondary end points included knee stiffness and function outcomes and adverse events (AEs).

Results: A total of 155 participants (64% women; mean age, 60.9 years; 50% Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 to 4) were randomly assigned to methotrexate (n = 77) or placebo (n = 78). Follow-up was 86% (n = 134; methotrexate: 66, placebo: 68) at 6 months. Mean knee pain decreased from 6.4 (SD, 1.80) at baseline to 5.1 (SD, 2.32) at 6 months in the methotrexate group and from 6.8 (SD, 1.62) to 6.2 (SD, 2.30) in the placebo group. The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed a statistically significant pain reduction of 0.79 NRS points in favor of methotrexate (95% CI, 0.08 to 1.51; P = 0.030). There were also statistically significant treatment group differences in favor of methotrexate at 6 months for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (0.60 points [CI, 0.01 to 1.18]; P = 0.045) and function (5.01 points [CI, 1.29 to 8.74]; P = 0.008). Treatment adherence analysis supported a dose-response effect. Four unrelated serious AEs were reported (methotrexate: 2, placebo: 2).

Limitation: Not permitting oral methotrexate to be changed to subcutaneous delivery for intolerance.

Conclusion: Oral methotrexate added to usual medications demonstrated statistically significant reduction in KOA pain, stiffness, and function at 6 months.

Primary funding source: Versus Arthritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信