在低风险人群中预测临产时初次剖宫产的胎儿和产妇因素:NICHD 胎儿生长研究--Singletons。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788274
Julio Mateus, Danielle R Stevens, Katherine L Grantz, Cuilin Zhang, Jagteshwar Grewal, William A Grobman, John Owen, Anthony C Sciscione, Ronald J Wapner, Daniel Skupski, Edward Chien, Deborah A Wing, Angela C Ranzini, Michael P Nageotte, Roger B Newman
{"title":"在低风险人群中预测临产时初次剖宫产的胎儿和产妇因素:NICHD 胎儿生长研究--Singletons。","authors":"Julio Mateus, Danielle R Stevens, Katherine L Grantz, Cuilin Zhang, Jagteshwar Grewal, William A Grobman, John Owen, Anthony C Sciscione, Ronald J Wapner, Daniel Skupski, Edward Chien, Deborah A Wing, Angela C Ranzini, Michael P Nageotte, Roger B Newman","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to examine associations of fetal biometric and amniotic fluid measures with intrapartum primary cesarean delivery (PCD) and develop prediction models for PCD based on ultrasound parameters and maternal factors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Secondary analysis of the National Institute of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Fetal Growth Studies-singleton cohort (2009-2013) including patients with uncomplicated pregnancies and intent to deliver vaginally at ≥37<sup>0/7</sup> weeks. The estimated fetal weight, individual biometric parameters, fetal asymmetry measurements, and amniotic fluid single deepest vertical pocket assessed at the final scan (mean 37.5 ± 1.9 weeks) were categorized as <10th, 10th to 90th (reference), and >90th percentiles. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between the ultrasound measures and PCD. Fetal and maternal SuperLearner prediction algorithms were constructed for the full and nulliparous cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of the 1,668 patients analyzed, 249 (14.9%) had PCD. The fetal head circumference, occipital-frontal diameter, and transverse abdominal diameter >90th percentile (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.39, 4.51; aOR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.02, 3.40; and aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.89, respectively) were associated with PCD. The fetal model demonstrated poor ability to predict PCD in the full cohort and in nulliparous patients (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.61; and AUC = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.60, respectively). Conversely, the maternal model had better predictive capability overall (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82) and in the nulliparous subgroup (AUC = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.77). Models combining maternal/fetal factors performed similarly to the maternal model (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82 in full cohort, and AUC = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.76 in nulliparas).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Although a few fetal biometric parameters were associated with PCD, the fetal prediction model had low performance. In contrast, the maternal model had a fair-to-good ability to predict PCD.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Fetal HC >90th percentile was associated with cesarean delivery.. · Fetal parameters did not effectively predict PCD.. · Maternal factors were more predictive of PCD.. · Maternal/fetal and maternal models performed similarly.. · Prediction models had lower performance in nulliparas..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"256-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fetal and Maternal Factors Predictive of Primary Cesarean Delivery at Term in a Low-Risk Population: NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.\",\"authors\":\"Julio Mateus, Danielle R Stevens, Katherine L Grantz, Cuilin Zhang, Jagteshwar Grewal, William A Grobman, John Owen, Anthony C Sciscione, Ronald J Wapner, Daniel Skupski, Edward Chien, Deborah A Wing, Angela C Ranzini, Michael P Nageotte, Roger B Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1788274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to examine associations of fetal biometric and amniotic fluid measures with intrapartum primary cesarean delivery (PCD) and develop prediction models for PCD based on ultrasound parameters and maternal factors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Secondary analysis of the National Institute of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Fetal Growth Studies-singleton cohort (2009-2013) including patients with uncomplicated pregnancies and intent to deliver vaginally at ≥37<sup>0/7</sup> weeks. The estimated fetal weight, individual biometric parameters, fetal asymmetry measurements, and amniotic fluid single deepest vertical pocket assessed at the final scan (mean 37.5 ± 1.9 weeks) were categorized as <10th, 10th to 90th (reference), and >90th percentiles. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between the ultrasound measures and PCD. Fetal and maternal SuperLearner prediction algorithms were constructed for the full and nulliparous cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of the 1,668 patients analyzed, 249 (14.9%) had PCD. The fetal head circumference, occipital-frontal diameter, and transverse abdominal diameter >90th percentile (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.39, 4.51; aOR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.02, 3.40; and aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.89, respectively) were associated with PCD. The fetal model demonstrated poor ability to predict PCD in the full cohort and in nulliparous patients (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.61; and AUC = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.60, respectively). Conversely, the maternal model had better predictive capability overall (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82) and in the nulliparous subgroup (AUC = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.77). Models combining maternal/fetal factors performed similarly to the maternal model (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82 in full cohort, and AUC = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.76 in nulliparas).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Although a few fetal biometric parameters were associated with PCD, the fetal prediction model had low performance. In contrast, the maternal model had a fair-to-good ability to predict PCD.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Fetal HC >90th percentile was associated with cesarean delivery.. · Fetal parameters did not effectively predict PCD.. · Maternal factors were more predictive of PCD.. · Maternal/fetal and maternal models performed similarly.. · Prediction models had lower performance in nulliparas..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"256-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693481/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788274\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨胎儿生物测量和羊水测量与产时初次剖宫产(PCD)的相关性,并根据超声参数和孕产妇因素建立PCD预测模型:研究设计:对尤妮斯-肯尼迪-施莱佛国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所(NICHD)的胎儿生长研究-孕妇队列(2009-2013年)进行二次分析,其中包括无并发症妊娠且打算在≥370/7周时经阴道分娩的患者。最后一次扫描(平均 37.5 ± 1.9 周)时评估的估计胎儿体重、单个生物测量参数、胎儿不对称测量值和羊水单个最深垂直袋被归类为第 90 百分位数。逻辑回归分析检验了超声测量与 PCD 之间的关联。针对全孕期和非全孕期队列构建了胎儿和母体 SuperLearner 预测算法:在分析的 1,668 名患者中,249 人(14.9%)患有 PCD。胎儿头围、枕额径和腹横径大于第 90 百分位数(调整后的几率比 [aOR] = 2.50,95% 置信区间 [95% CI]:1.39, 4.51;调整后的几率比 [aOR] = 2.50,95% 置信区间 [95% CI]:1.39, 4.51):1.39, 4.51; aOR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.02, 3.40; and aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.89)与 PCD 相关。胎儿模型在整个队列和无阴道患者中预测 PCD 的能力较差(接收者工作特征曲线下面积 [AUC] = 0.56,95% CI:0.52,0.61;AUC = 0.54,95% CI:0.49,0.60)。相反,母体模型在总体上(AUC = 0.79,95% CI:0.75,0.82)和无产儿亚组(AUC = 0.72,95% CI:0.67,0.77)具有更好的预测能力。结合母体/胎儿因素的模型与母体模型的表现相似(全队列的 AUC = 0.78,95% CI:0.75,0.82;无胎儿的 AUC = 0.71,95% CI:0.66,0.76):结论:虽然一些胎儿生物测量参数与 PCD 相关,但胎儿预测模型的性能较低。相比之下,母体模型预测 PCD 的能力尚可:- 胎儿HC>90百分位数与剖宫产有关。- 胎儿参数不能有效预测PCD。- 母体因素更能预测 PCD。- 母体/胎儿模型和母体模型表现相似。- 预测模型在非妊娠期的表现较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fetal and Maternal Factors Predictive of Primary Cesarean Delivery at Term in a Low-Risk Population: NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.

Objective:  This study aimed to examine associations of fetal biometric and amniotic fluid measures with intrapartum primary cesarean delivery (PCD) and develop prediction models for PCD based on ultrasound parameters and maternal factors.

Study design:  Secondary analysis of the National Institute of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Fetal Growth Studies-singleton cohort (2009-2013) including patients with uncomplicated pregnancies and intent to deliver vaginally at ≥370/7 weeks. The estimated fetal weight, individual biometric parameters, fetal asymmetry measurements, and amniotic fluid single deepest vertical pocket assessed at the final scan (mean 37.5 ± 1.9 weeks) were categorized as <10th, 10th to 90th (reference), and >90th percentiles. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between the ultrasound measures and PCD. Fetal and maternal SuperLearner prediction algorithms were constructed for the full and nulliparous cohorts.

Results:  Of the 1,668 patients analyzed, 249 (14.9%) had PCD. The fetal head circumference, occipital-frontal diameter, and transverse abdominal diameter >90th percentile (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.39, 4.51; aOR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.02, 3.40; and aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.89, respectively) were associated with PCD. The fetal model demonstrated poor ability to predict PCD in the full cohort and in nulliparous patients (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.61; and AUC = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.60, respectively). Conversely, the maternal model had better predictive capability overall (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82) and in the nulliparous subgroup (AUC = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.77). Models combining maternal/fetal factors performed similarly to the maternal model (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82 in full cohort, and AUC = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.76 in nulliparas).

Conclusion:  Although a few fetal biometric parameters were associated with PCD, the fetal prediction model had low performance. In contrast, the maternal model had a fair-to-good ability to predict PCD.

Key points: · Fetal HC >90th percentile was associated with cesarean delivery.. · Fetal parameters did not effectively predict PCD.. · Maternal factors were more predictive of PCD.. · Maternal/fetal and maternal models performed similarly.. · Prediction models had lower performance in nulliparas..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信