Changes in Shoulder Rotation Based on Elevation in Children With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

Purpose

Lack of shoulder external rotation is common in children with brachial plexus birth injuries. Development of glenohumeral (GH) dysplasia is associated with progressive loss of passive external rotation. Some authors recommend measuring external rotation with the arm adducted, whereas others recommend measurement with the arm in 90° of abduction. The purpose of this study was to compare active and passive external rotation and internal rotation measured in adduction versus abduction.

Methods

Fifteen children with brachial plexus birth injuries held their affected arms in maximal external and internal rotation with the arm adducted and the arm at approximately 90° of abduction. Active and passive rotations were measured with three-dimensional motion capture. Scapulothoracic (ST) internal/external rotation and GH internal/external rotation joint angles were calculated and compared using multivariable, one-way repeated measures analyses of variance.

Results

There were no significant differences for active or passive ST rotation in external rotation in adduction versus abduction. Glenohumeral external rotation was significantly increased with the arm in abduction compared with adduction both actively and passively. There were no differences in ST rotation in active versus passive conditions, but all GH rotations were significantly greater passively.

Conclusions

Shoulder internal/external rotation in abduction and adduction is not interchangeable. Comprehensive assessment of shoulder external and internal rotation should include both adduction and abduction.

Clinical relevance

For children with brachial plexus birth injuries, both active and passive GH external rotations were greater in abduction. Therefore, early GH joint dysplasia may be missed if GH external rotation is measured in abduction. Additionally, consistency in arm position is important for comparison over time. The entire ST rotation capacity was used to perform maximal internal and external rotation, but the entire passive GH range of motion was not actively used. This highlights an area for potential surgical intervention to improve motion.