探索电子会诊转诊的模式和差异:科罗拉多州医疗保健中的患者和社区因素分析》(An Analysis of Patient and Community Factors in Colorado Health Care)。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0243
Asal Pilehvari, Wen You, Stephanie Grim, Rodger Kessler, John F Thomas
{"title":"探索电子会诊转诊的模式和差异:科罗拉多州医疗保健中的患者和社区因素分析》(An Analysis of Patient and Community Factors in Colorado Health Care)。","authors":"Asal Pilehvari, Wen You, Stephanie Grim, Rodger Kessler, John F Thomas","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Electronic consultations (e-consults) provide a strategic solution to address challenges in health care systems related to cost management and access to care. This study aims to investigate the multilevel patient characteristics associated with higher frequency of receiving e-consults and increased likelihood of completion. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> University of Colorado's electronic medical record were analyzed to study factors influencing referral types (e-consult vs. standard) and their completion rates from April 2018 to September 2023. Multivariate probit regression assessed the impact of patient-level and community-level factors (urban-rural classification, Social Vulnerability Index, and technology accessibility) on e-consult referrals and completion. <b>Results:</b> In 263,882 records, 92.5% were standard referrals, and 7.4% were e-consult referrals. Analysis showed that females were less likely than males (OR = 0.95, 95%CI[0.93, 0.96]), and Blacks were more likely than Whites (OR = 1.03, 95%CI[1.01,1.06]) to receive e-consult referrals. Medicaid patients had lower odds compared to those with Medicare only (OR = 1.04, 95%CI[1.00,1.07]), and rural residency was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.80, 95%CI[0.73,0.88]) of e-consult referral. Factors such as areas with higher population without internet subscription (OR = 1.03, 95%CI[1.01,1.04]) and higher social vulnerabilities (OR = 1.26, 95%CI[1.16,1.37]) increased e-consult odds. Black patients were less likely to have their referrals completed compared to Whites. Patients who resided in regions with limited computer and smartphone access, as well as higher social vulnerabilities, showed decreased odds of referral completion. <b>Discussions and Conclusion:</b> This study highlights the need for partnering with a variety of health care organizations, especially those serving low-income and disadvantaged populations, to enhance health care access equity through the use of e-consults.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Patterns and Disparities in E-Consult Referrals: An Analysis of Patient and Community Factors in Colorado Health Care.\",\"authors\":\"Asal Pilehvari, Wen You, Stephanie Grim, Rodger Kessler, John F Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2024.0243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Electronic consultations (e-consults) provide a strategic solution to address challenges in health care systems related to cost management and access to care. This study aims to investigate the multilevel patient characteristics associated with higher frequency of receiving e-consults and increased likelihood of completion. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> University of Colorado's electronic medical record were analyzed to study factors influencing referral types (e-consult vs. standard) and their completion rates from April 2018 to September 2023. Multivariate probit regression assessed the impact of patient-level and community-level factors (urban-rural classification, Social Vulnerability Index, and technology accessibility) on e-consult referrals and completion. <b>Results:</b> In 263,882 records, 92.5% were standard referrals, and 7.4% were e-consult referrals. Analysis showed that females were less likely than males (OR = 0.95, 95%CI[0.93, 0.96]), and Blacks were more likely than Whites (OR = 1.03, 95%CI[1.01,1.06]) to receive e-consult referrals. Medicaid patients had lower odds compared to those with Medicare only (OR = 1.04, 95%CI[1.00,1.07]), and rural residency was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.80, 95%CI[0.73,0.88]) of e-consult referral. Factors such as areas with higher population without internet subscription (OR = 1.03, 95%CI[1.01,1.04]) and higher social vulnerabilities (OR = 1.26, 95%CI[1.16,1.37]) increased e-consult odds. Black patients were less likely to have their referrals completed compared to Whites. Patients who resided in regions with limited computer and smartphone access, as well as higher social vulnerabilities, showed decreased odds of referral completion. <b>Discussions and Conclusion:</b> This study highlights the need for partnering with a variety of health care organizations, especially those serving low-income and disadvantaged populations, to enhance health care access equity through the use of e-consults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:电子会诊(e-consults)为应对医疗保健系统在成本管理和医疗服务获取方面的挑战提供了一种战略性解决方案。本研究旨在调查与更频繁接受电子会诊和更有可能完成电子会诊相关的多层次患者特征。材料与方法:对科罗拉多大学的电子病历进行分析,研究从 2018 年 4 月至 2023 年 9 月期间影响转诊类型(电子会诊与标准会诊)及其完成率的因素。多变量 probit 回归评估了患者层面和社区层面因素(城乡分类、社会脆弱性指数和技术可及性)对电子会诊转诊和完成率的影响。结果显示在 263 882 份记录中,92.5% 为标准转诊,7.4% 为电子会诊转诊。分析表明,女性接受电子会诊转诊的几率低于男性(OR = 0.95,95%CI[0.93, 0.96]),黑人接受电子会诊转诊的几率高于白人(OR = 1.03,95%CI[1.01,1.06])。与仅享受医疗保险的患者相比,医疗补助患者接受电子会诊转诊的几率较低(OR = 1.04,95%CI[1.00,1.07]),农村居民接受电子会诊转诊的几率较低(OR = 0.80,95%CI[0.73,0.88])。没有互联网用户的人口较多地区(OR = 1.03,95%CI[1.01,1.04])和社会弱势人群较多(OR = 1.26,95%CI[1.16,1.37])等因素会增加电子会诊的几率。与白人相比,黑人患者完成转诊的几率较低。居住在电脑和智能手机使用受限地区以及社会脆弱性较高的患者完成转诊的几率较低。讨论与结论:本研究强调了与各种医疗机构合作的必要性,尤其是那些服务于低收入和弱势群体的医疗机构,以通过使用电子会诊提高医疗服务的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Patterns and Disparities in E-Consult Referrals: An Analysis of Patient and Community Factors in Colorado Health Care.

Objective: Electronic consultations (e-consults) provide a strategic solution to address challenges in health care systems related to cost management and access to care. This study aims to investigate the multilevel patient characteristics associated with higher frequency of receiving e-consults and increased likelihood of completion. Materials and Methods: University of Colorado's electronic medical record were analyzed to study factors influencing referral types (e-consult vs. standard) and their completion rates from April 2018 to September 2023. Multivariate probit regression assessed the impact of patient-level and community-level factors (urban-rural classification, Social Vulnerability Index, and technology accessibility) on e-consult referrals and completion. Results: In 263,882 records, 92.5% were standard referrals, and 7.4% were e-consult referrals. Analysis showed that females were less likely than males (OR = 0.95, 95%CI[0.93, 0.96]), and Blacks were more likely than Whites (OR = 1.03, 95%CI[1.01,1.06]) to receive e-consult referrals. Medicaid patients had lower odds compared to those with Medicare only (OR = 1.04, 95%CI[1.00,1.07]), and rural residency was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.80, 95%CI[0.73,0.88]) of e-consult referral. Factors such as areas with higher population without internet subscription (OR = 1.03, 95%CI[1.01,1.04]) and higher social vulnerabilities (OR = 1.26, 95%CI[1.16,1.37]) increased e-consult odds. Black patients were less likely to have their referrals completed compared to Whites. Patients who resided in regions with limited computer and smartphone access, as well as higher social vulnerabilities, showed decreased odds of referral completion. Discussions and Conclusion: This study highlights the need for partnering with a variety of health care organizations, especially those serving low-income and disadvantaged populations, to enhance health care access equity through the use of e-consults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信