优化肿瘤解剖程序可显著提高分子检测的质量。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Bryan L. Betz , Corey S. Post , Jennifer Bergendahl , Nanci Lefebvre , Helmut Weigelin , Noah A. Brown
{"title":"优化肿瘤解剖程序可显著提高分子检测的质量。","authors":"Bryan L. Betz ,&nbsp;Corey S. Post ,&nbsp;Jennifer Bergendahl ,&nbsp;Nanci Lefebvre ,&nbsp;Helmut Weigelin ,&nbsp;Noah A. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Molecular tests have an inherent limit of detection (LOD) and, therefore, require samples with sufficiently high percentages of neoplastic cells. Many laboratories use tissue dissection; however, optimal procedures for dissection and quality assurance measures have not been established. In this study, several modifications to tissue dissection procedures and workflow were introduced over 4 years. Each modification resulted in a significant improvement in one or more quality assurance measures. The review of materials following dissection resulted in a 90% reduction in <em>KRAS</em> mutations below the stated LOD (<em>P</em> = 0.004). Mutation allele frequencies correlated best with estimated tumor percentages for pathologists with more experience in this process. The direct marking of unstained slides, use of a stereomicroscope, validation of extraction from diagnostic slides, and use of a robust, targeted next-generation sequencing platform all resulted in reduction of quantity not sufficient specimens from 20% to 25% to nearly 0%, without a significant increase in test failures or mutations below the LOD. These data indicate that post-dissection review of unstained slides and monitoring quantity not sufficient rate, test failure rate, and mutation allele frequencies are important tumor dissection quality assurance measures that should be considered by laboratories performing tissue dissections. The amendments to tissue dissection procedures enacted during this study resulted in a measurable improvement in the quality and reliability of this process based on these metrics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001624/pdfft?md5=7ea2902809fe522e8be547b057d149fb&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157824001624-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of Tumor Dissection Procedures Leads to Measurable Improvement in the Quality of Molecular Testing\",\"authors\":\"Bryan L. Betz ,&nbsp;Corey S. Post ,&nbsp;Jennifer Bergendahl ,&nbsp;Nanci Lefebvre ,&nbsp;Helmut Weigelin ,&nbsp;Noah A. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.06.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Molecular tests have an inherent limit of detection (LOD) and, therefore, require samples with sufficiently high percentages of neoplastic cells. Many laboratories use tissue dissection; however, optimal procedures for dissection and quality assurance measures have not been established. In this study, several modifications to tissue dissection procedures and workflow were introduced over 4 years. Each modification resulted in a significant improvement in one or more quality assurance measures. The review of materials following dissection resulted in a 90% reduction in <em>KRAS</em> mutations below the stated LOD (<em>P</em> = 0.004). Mutation allele frequencies correlated best with estimated tumor percentages for pathologists with more experience in this process. The direct marking of unstained slides, use of a stereomicroscope, validation of extraction from diagnostic slides, and use of a robust, targeted next-generation sequencing platform all resulted in reduction of quantity not sufficient specimens from 20% to 25% to nearly 0%, without a significant increase in test failures or mutations below the LOD. These data indicate that post-dissection review of unstained slides and monitoring quantity not sufficient rate, test failure rate, and mutation allele frequencies are important tumor dissection quality assurance measures that should be considered by laboratories performing tissue dissections. The amendments to tissue dissection procedures enacted during this study resulted in a measurable improvement in the quality and reliability of this process based on these metrics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001624/pdfft?md5=7ea2902809fe522e8be547b057d149fb&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157824001624-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分子检测具有固有的检测限(LOD),因此需要样本中具有足够高比例的肿瘤细胞。许多实验室都采用组织解剖法,但最佳的解剖程序和质量保证(QA)措施尚未确立。在这项研究中,对组织解剖程序和工作流程进行了多次修改,历时四年。每项改进都显著提高了一项或多项质量保证措施。解剖后对材料的审查使低于规定 LOD 的 KRAS 突变减少了 90%(p = 0.004)。在这一过程中经验更丰富的病理学家的突变等位基因频率与估计肿瘤百分比的相关性最好。直接标记未染色的切片、使用体视显微镜、验证诊断切片中的提取物以及使用稳健、有针对性的 NGS 平台,所有这些都使数量不足(QNS)的标本从 20-25% 减少到近 0%,而检测失败或低于 LOD 的突变并未显著增加。这些数据表明,对未染色的切片进行解剖后复查并监测 QNS 率、检测失败率和突变等位基因频率是重要的肿瘤解剖质量保证措施,进行组织解剖的实验室应加以考虑。根据这些指标,本研究对组织解剖程序所做的修订显著提高了这一过程的质量和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of Tumor Dissection Procedures Leads to Measurable Improvement in the Quality of Molecular Testing

Molecular tests have an inherent limit of detection (LOD) and, therefore, require samples with sufficiently high percentages of neoplastic cells. Many laboratories use tissue dissection; however, optimal procedures for dissection and quality assurance measures have not been established. In this study, several modifications to tissue dissection procedures and workflow were introduced over 4 years. Each modification resulted in a significant improvement in one or more quality assurance measures. The review of materials following dissection resulted in a 90% reduction in KRAS mutations below the stated LOD (P = 0.004). Mutation allele frequencies correlated best with estimated tumor percentages for pathologists with more experience in this process. The direct marking of unstained slides, use of a stereomicroscope, validation of extraction from diagnostic slides, and use of a robust, targeted next-generation sequencing platform all resulted in reduction of quantity not sufficient specimens from 20% to 25% to nearly 0%, without a significant increase in test failures or mutations below the LOD. These data indicate that post-dissection review of unstained slides and monitoring quantity not sufficient rate, test failure rate, and mutation allele frequencies are important tumor dissection quality assurance measures that should be considered by laboratories performing tissue dissections. The amendments to tissue dissection procedures enacted during this study resulted in a measurable improvement in the quality and reliability of this process based on these metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
143
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信