{"title":"RNA 原位杂交图像基因表达分析方法的比较分析。","authors":"Valeria Ariotta , Eros Azzalini , Vincenzo Canzonieri , Sampsa Hautaniemi , Serena Bonin","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gene expression analysis is pivotal in cancer research and clinical practice. Although traditional methods lack spatial context, RNA <em>in situ</em> hybridization (RNA-ISH) is a powerful technique that retains spatial tissue information. Here, RNAscope score, RT–droplet digital PCR, and automated QuantISH and QuPath were used for quantifying RNA-ISH expression values from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples. The methods were compared using high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma samples, focusing on <em>CCNE1</em>, <em>WFDC2</em>, and <em>PPIB</em> genes. The findings demonstrate good concordance between automated methods and RNAscope, with RT–droplet digital PCR showing less concordance. Additionally, QuantISH exhibits robust performance, even for low-expressed genes like <em>CCNE1</em>, showcasing its modular design and enhancing accessibility as a viable alternative for gene expression analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Gene Expression Analysis Methods for RNA in Situ Hybridization Images\",\"authors\":\"Valeria Ariotta , Eros Azzalini , Vincenzo Canzonieri , Sampsa Hautaniemi , Serena Bonin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.06.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Gene expression analysis is pivotal in cancer research and clinical practice. Although traditional methods lack spatial context, RNA <em>in situ</em> hybridization (RNA-ISH) is a powerful technique that retains spatial tissue information. Here, RNAscope score, RT–droplet digital PCR, and automated QuantISH and QuPath were used for quantifying RNA-ISH expression values from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples. The methods were compared using high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma samples, focusing on <em>CCNE1</em>, <em>WFDC2</em>, and <em>PPIB</em> genes. The findings demonstrate good concordance between automated methods and RNAscope, with RT–droplet digital PCR showing less concordance. Additionally, QuantISH exhibits robust performance, even for low-expressed genes like <em>CCNE1</em>, showcasing its modular design and enhancing accessibility as a viable alternative for gene expression analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001636\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis of Gene Expression Analysis Methods for RNA in Situ Hybridization Images
Gene expression analysis is pivotal in cancer research and clinical practice. Although traditional methods lack spatial context, RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) is a powerful technique that retains spatial tissue information. Here, RNAscope score, RT–droplet digital PCR, and automated QuantISH and QuPath were used for quantifying RNA-ISH expression values from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples. The methods were compared using high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma samples, focusing on CCNE1, WFDC2, and PPIB genes. The findings demonstrate good concordance between automated methods and RNAscope, with RT–droplet digital PCR showing less concordance. Additionally, QuantISH exhibits robust performance, even for low-expressed genes like CCNE1, showcasing its modular design and enhancing accessibility as a viable alternative for gene expression analysis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.