血管外科综合住院医师培训与普通外科住院医师血管病例能力和自主性的提高有关。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Gabrielle K. Steinl , Ting Sun , W. Darrin Clouse , Brigitte K. Smith , M. Libby Weaver
{"title":"血管外科综合住院医师培训与普通外科住院医师血管病例能力和自主性的提高有关。","authors":"Gabrielle K. Steinl ,&nbsp;Ting Sun ,&nbsp;W. Darrin Clouse ,&nbsp;Brigitte K. Smith ,&nbsp;M. Libby Weaver","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Integrated vascular surgery residency positions have doubled more than the last decade. Studies have investigated the impact of co-existing subspecialty surgical training programs on case volume of general surgery residents (GSRs). However, no studies have explored the impact of subspecialty training on GSR operative competency. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of integrated residencies on operative performance and autonomy of GSR performing vascular procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Autonomy and performance ratings of GSR participating in vascular surgery cases were collected from all institutions participating in the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning application database from 2015 to 2023. Faculty and self-assessments of autonomy and performance on vascular cases performed by GSRs at programs with co-existing vascular integrated residency (VIR), vascular surgery fellowship (VSF), or no subspecialty vascular training (VX) were compared using Fisher's exact tests with Bonferroni corrections across training levels and case complexity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven thousand one hundred seventy five assessments (26% at institutions with VIR, 46% VSF, and 28% VX) were submitted by 920 GSRs and 343 faculty. Senior GSRs at programs with VSF achieved lower autonomy than those with VIR (<em>P</em> = 0.049) or VX (<em>P</em> = 0.042) based on faculty assessment. GSRs achieved a level of “practice ready” at significantly higher rates when training at programs with VIR, and at the lowest rates with VSF (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). However, self-perception of autonomy and performance was highest among GSRs at programs with VX compared with VIR and VSF (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The presence of VIR was associated with higher achievement of “practice ready” competency and higher levels of operative autonomy among senior GSRs performing vascular procedures. Shared-learning among peers and faculty expertise in teaching resident-level trainees may contribute to this finding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-Existing Vascular Surgery Integrated Residencies are Associated with Increased General Surgery Resident Proficiency and Autonomy in Vascular Cases\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle K. Steinl ,&nbsp;Ting Sun ,&nbsp;W. Darrin Clouse ,&nbsp;Brigitte K. Smith ,&nbsp;M. Libby Weaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Integrated vascular surgery residency positions have doubled more than the last decade. Studies have investigated the impact of co-existing subspecialty surgical training programs on case volume of general surgery residents (GSRs). However, no studies have explored the impact of subspecialty training on GSR operative competency. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of integrated residencies on operative performance and autonomy of GSR performing vascular procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Autonomy and performance ratings of GSR participating in vascular surgery cases were collected from all institutions participating in the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning application database from 2015 to 2023. Faculty and self-assessments of autonomy and performance on vascular cases performed by GSRs at programs with co-existing vascular integrated residency (VIR), vascular surgery fellowship (VSF), or no subspecialty vascular training (VX) were compared using Fisher's exact tests with Bonferroni corrections across training levels and case complexity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven thousand one hundred seventy five assessments (26% at institutions with VIR, 46% VSF, and 28% VX) were submitted by 920 GSRs and 343 faculty. Senior GSRs at programs with VSF achieved lower autonomy than those with VIR (<em>P</em> = 0.049) or VX (<em>P</em> = 0.042) based on faculty assessment. GSRs achieved a level of “practice ready” at significantly higher rates when training at programs with VIR, and at the lowest rates with VSF (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). However, self-perception of autonomy and performance was highest among GSRs at programs with VX compared with VIR and VSF (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The presence of VIR was associated with higher achievement of “practice ready” competency and higher levels of operative autonomy among senior GSRs performing vascular procedures. Shared-learning among peers and faculty expertise in teaching resident-level trainees may contribute to this finding.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624004710\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624004710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在过去十年中,血管外科综合住院医师职位增加了一倍。已有研究调查了并存的亚专科外科培训项目对普外科住院医师(GSR)病例量的影响。然而,还没有研究探讨过亚专科培训对普通外科住院医师手术能力的影响。本研究旨在了解综合住院医师培训对普通外科住院医师进行血管手术时的手术表现和自主性的影响:方法:从2015-2023年所有参与提高医学专业学习协会(SIMPL)应用数据库的机构中收集了参与血管外科手术病例的GSR的自主性和表现评分。在有血管综合住院医师(VIR)、仅有研究员(VSF)或无血管受训者(VX)的项目中,使用费雪精确检验和Bonferroni校正对不同培训级别和病例复杂程度的GSR执行血管病例的自主性和绩效进行了比较:920 名 GSR 和 343 名教师提交了 11,175 份评估(26% 在有 VIR 的机构,46% 在有 VSF 的机构,28% 在有 VX 的机构)。根据教员的评估,VSF 项目的高级一般事务人员的自主性低于 VIR 项目(p = 0.049)或 VX 项目(p = 0.042)。GSR 在 VIR 项目中达到 "实践准备就绪 "水平的比例明显更高,而在 VSF 项目中达到这一水平的比例最低(p < 0.001)。然而,与 VIR 和 VSF 相比,在有 VX 的项目中,GSR 对自主性和绩效的自我感觉最高(p < 0.001):结论:VIR的存在与高年级一般事务人员在进行血管手术时更高的 "实践准备 "能力和更高的手术自主性有关。同行间的共同学习和教师在教授住院医师级别学员方面的专业知识可能是导致这一结果的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-Existing Vascular Surgery Integrated Residencies are Associated with Increased General Surgery Resident Proficiency and Autonomy in Vascular Cases

Background

Integrated vascular surgery residency positions have doubled more than the last decade. Studies have investigated the impact of co-existing subspecialty surgical training programs on case volume of general surgery residents (GSRs). However, no studies have explored the impact of subspecialty training on GSR operative competency. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of integrated residencies on operative performance and autonomy of GSR performing vascular procedures.

Methods

Autonomy and performance ratings of GSR participating in vascular surgery cases were collected from all institutions participating in the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning application database from 2015 to 2023. Faculty and self-assessments of autonomy and performance on vascular cases performed by GSRs at programs with co-existing vascular integrated residency (VIR), vascular surgery fellowship (VSF), or no subspecialty vascular training (VX) were compared using Fisher's exact tests with Bonferroni corrections across training levels and case complexity.

Results

Eleven thousand one hundred seventy five assessments (26% at institutions with VIR, 46% VSF, and 28% VX) were submitted by 920 GSRs and 343 faculty. Senior GSRs at programs with VSF achieved lower autonomy than those with VIR (P = 0.049) or VX (P = 0.042) based on faculty assessment. GSRs achieved a level of “practice ready” at significantly higher rates when training at programs with VIR, and at the lowest rates with VSF (P < 0.001). However, self-perception of autonomy and performance was highest among GSRs at programs with VX compared with VIR and VSF (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The presence of VIR was associated with higher achievement of “practice ready” competency and higher levels of operative autonomy among senior GSRs performing vascular procedures. Shared-learning among peers and faculty expertise in teaching resident-level trainees may contribute to this finding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信