{"title":"关于奇正态数","authors":"Malabika Pramanik, Junqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s13226-024-00642-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A real number <i>x</i> is considered normal in an integer base <span>\\(b \\geqslant 2\\)</span> if its digit expansion in this base is “equitable”, ensuring that for each <span>\\(k \\geqslant 1\\)</span>, every ordered sequence of <i>k</i> digits from <span>\\(\\{0, 1, \\ldots , b-1\\}\\)</span> occurs in the digit expansion of <i>x</i> with the same limiting frequency. Borel’s classical result [4] asserts that Lebesgue-almost every <span>\\(x \\in {\\mathbb {R}}\\)</span> is normal in every base <span>\\(b \\geqslant 2\\)</span>. This paper serves as a case study of the measure-theoretic properties of Lebesgue-null sets containing numbers that are normal only in certain bases. We consider the set <span>\\({\\mathscr {N}}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span> of reals that are normal in odd bases but not in even ones. This set has full Hausdorff dimension [30] but zero Fourier dimension. The latter condition means that <span>\\({\\mathscr {N}}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span> cannot support a probability measure whose Fourier transform has power decay at infinity. Our main result is that <span>\\({\\mathscr {N}}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span> supports a Rajchman measure <span>\\(\\mu \\)</span>, whose Fourier transform <span>\\({\\widehat{\\mu }}(\\xi )\\)</span> approaches 0 as <span>\\(|\\xi | \\rightarrow \\infty \\)</span> by definiton, albeit slower than any negative power of <span>\\(|\\xi |\\)</span>. Moreover, the decay rate of <span>\\({\\widehat{\\mu }}\\)</span> is essentially optimal, subject to the constraints of its support. The methods draw inspiration from the number-theoretic results of Schmidt [38] and a construction of Lyons [24]. As a consequence, <span>\\(\\mathscr {N}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span> emerges as a set of multiplicity, in the sense of Fourier analysis. This addresses a question posed by Kahane and Salem [17] in the special case of <span>\\({\\mathscr {N}}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span>.</p>","PeriodicalId":501427,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On odd-normal numbers\",\"authors\":\"Malabika Pramanik, Junqiang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13226-024-00642-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A real number <i>x</i> is considered normal in an integer base <span>\\\\(b \\\\geqslant 2\\\\)</span> if its digit expansion in this base is “equitable”, ensuring that for each <span>\\\\(k \\\\geqslant 1\\\\)</span>, every ordered sequence of <i>k</i> digits from <span>\\\\(\\\\{0, 1, \\\\ldots , b-1\\\\}\\\\)</span> occurs in the digit expansion of <i>x</i> with the same limiting frequency. Borel’s classical result [4] asserts that Lebesgue-almost every <span>\\\\(x \\\\in {\\\\mathbb {R}}\\\\)</span> is normal in every base <span>\\\\(b \\\\geqslant 2\\\\)</span>. This paper serves as a case study of the measure-theoretic properties of Lebesgue-null sets containing numbers that are normal only in certain bases. We consider the set <span>\\\\({\\\\mathscr {N}}({\\\\mathscr {O}}, {\\\\mathscr {E}})\\\\)</span> of reals that are normal in odd bases but not in even ones. This set has full Hausdorff dimension [30] but zero Fourier dimension. The latter condition means that <span>\\\\({\\\\mathscr {N}}({\\\\mathscr {O}}, {\\\\mathscr {E}})\\\\)</span> cannot support a probability measure whose Fourier transform has power decay at infinity. Our main result is that <span>\\\\({\\\\mathscr {N}}({\\\\mathscr {O}}, {\\\\mathscr {E}})\\\\)</span> supports a Rajchman measure <span>\\\\(\\\\mu \\\\)</span>, whose Fourier transform <span>\\\\({\\\\widehat{\\\\mu }}(\\\\xi )\\\\)</span> approaches 0 as <span>\\\\(|\\\\xi | \\\\rightarrow \\\\infty \\\\)</span> by definiton, albeit slower than any negative power of <span>\\\\(|\\\\xi |\\\\)</span>. Moreover, the decay rate of <span>\\\\({\\\\widehat{\\\\mu }}\\\\)</span> is essentially optimal, subject to the constraints of its support. The methods draw inspiration from the number-theoretic results of Schmidt [38] and a construction of Lyons [24]. As a consequence, <span>\\\\(\\\\mathscr {N}({\\\\mathscr {O}}, {\\\\mathscr {E}})\\\\)</span> emerges as a set of multiplicity, in the sense of Fourier analysis. This addresses a question posed by Kahane and Salem [17] in the special case of <span>\\\\({\\\\mathscr {N}}({\\\\mathscr {O}}, {\\\\mathscr {E}})\\\\)</span>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-024-00642-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-024-00642-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
如果一个实数 x 在整数基 \(b \geqslant 2\) 中的位数展开是 "等价 "的,确保对于每一个 \(k \geqslant 1\) ,来自 \(\{0, 1, \ldots , b-1\}\) 的 k 位数的每一个有序序列都以相同的极限频率出现在 x 的位数展开中,那么这个实数 x 在这个整数基 \(b \geqslant 2\) 中就被认为是正常的。Borel的经典结果[4]断言,Lebesgue-almost every \(x \in {\mathbb {R}}\) is normal in every base \(b \geqslant 2\).本文是对包含只在特定基中正常的数的 Lebesgue 空集的度量理论性质的案例研究。我们考虑了在奇数基中正常而在偶数基中不正常的实数集 ({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})。这个集合具有完整的豪斯多夫维度[30],但傅里叶维度为零。后一个条件意味着 \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\ 不能支持其傅里叶变换在无穷大时有幂衰减的概率度量。我们的主要结果是 \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})支持一个拉杰奇曼度量(Rajchman measure)、其傅里叶变换 \({\widehat{\mu }}(\xi )\) 随着 \(|\xi |\rightarrow \infty \) 的定义而趋近于 0,尽管比 \(|\xi |\) 的任何负幂次都要慢。此外,受其支持的限制,\({\widehat{\mu }}\) 的衰减率基本上是最优的。这些方法从 Schmidt [38] 的数论结果和 Lyons [24] 的构造中得到启发。因此,在傅立叶分析的意义上,\(\mathscr {N}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\)作为一个多重性集合出现了。这解决了 Kahane 和 Salem [17] 在 \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\ 的特殊情况下提出的一个问题。)
A real number x is considered normal in an integer base \(b \geqslant 2\) if its digit expansion in this base is “equitable”, ensuring that for each \(k \geqslant 1\), every ordered sequence of k digits from \(\{0, 1, \ldots , b-1\}\) occurs in the digit expansion of x with the same limiting frequency. Borel’s classical result [4] asserts that Lebesgue-almost every \(x \in {\mathbb {R}}\) is normal in every base \(b \geqslant 2\). This paper serves as a case study of the measure-theoretic properties of Lebesgue-null sets containing numbers that are normal only in certain bases. We consider the set \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\) of reals that are normal in odd bases but not in even ones. This set has full Hausdorff dimension [30] but zero Fourier dimension. The latter condition means that \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\) cannot support a probability measure whose Fourier transform has power decay at infinity. Our main result is that \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\) supports a Rajchman measure \(\mu \), whose Fourier transform \({\widehat{\mu }}(\xi )\) approaches 0 as \(|\xi | \rightarrow \infty \) by definiton, albeit slower than any negative power of \(|\xi |\). Moreover, the decay rate of \({\widehat{\mu }}\) is essentially optimal, subject to the constraints of its support. The methods draw inspiration from the number-theoretic results of Schmidt [38] and a construction of Lyons [24]. As a consequence, \(\mathscr {N}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\) emerges as a set of multiplicity, in the sense of Fourier analysis. This addresses a question posed by Kahane and Salem [17] in the special case of \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\).