自我参照疼痛想象过程中的神经元激活模式

Q2 Medicine
Annabel Vetterlein , Thomas Plieger , Merlin Monzel , Svea A. Hogeterp , Lilli Wagner , Thomas Grünhage , Andrea Felten , Peter Trautner , Jana Karneboge , Martin Reuter
{"title":"自我参照疼痛想象过程中的神经元激活模式","authors":"Annabel Vetterlein ,&nbsp;Thomas Plieger ,&nbsp;Merlin Monzel ,&nbsp;Svea A. Hogeterp ,&nbsp;Lilli Wagner ,&nbsp;Thomas Grünhage ,&nbsp;Andrea Felten ,&nbsp;Peter Trautner ,&nbsp;Jana Karneboge ,&nbsp;Martin Reuter","doi":"10.1016/j.ynpai.2024.100158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In clinical assessments and pain therapy, patients are asked to imagine themselves in pain. However, the underlying neuronal processes remain poorly understood. Prior research has focused on empathy for pain or reported small sample sizes. Thus, the present study aimed to promote the neurobiological understanding of self-referential pain imagination. We hypothesised to find activation contrasts (pain vs. no pain) across pain-related areas and expected two of the most prominent predictors of chronic pain, pain sensitivity (PS) and locus of control (LoC), to be moderators.</p><p>In an fMRI study, <em>N</em> = 82 participants completed a pain imagination task, in which they were asked to imagine themselves in painful and non-painful situations presented in the form of pictures and texts. After each trial, they were instructed to give painfulness ratings. As a laboratory measure of PS, electrical pain thresholds were assessed. A questionnaire was completed to measure LoC.</p><p>Across presentation modes we found activity contrasts in previously pain-related regions, such as the prefrontal, supplementary motor, primary motor, somatosensory and posterior parietal cortices, and the cerebellum. We found positive associations of PS and external LoC with painfulness ratings, and a negative correlation between PS and internal LoC. Despite our hypotheses, neither PS nor internal LoC were significant predictors of the BOLD-signal contrasts.</p><p>Though future studies are needed to draw further conclusions, our results provide preliminary evidence of a potential neuronal imagination-perception overlap in pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52177,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Pain","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X24000096/pdfft?md5=8a9c2603322477b07469a22e7aeb5eea&pid=1-s2.0-S2452073X24000096-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuronal activation patterns during self-referential pain imagination\",\"authors\":\"Annabel Vetterlein ,&nbsp;Thomas Plieger ,&nbsp;Merlin Monzel ,&nbsp;Svea A. Hogeterp ,&nbsp;Lilli Wagner ,&nbsp;Thomas Grünhage ,&nbsp;Andrea Felten ,&nbsp;Peter Trautner ,&nbsp;Jana Karneboge ,&nbsp;Martin Reuter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ynpai.2024.100158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In clinical assessments and pain therapy, patients are asked to imagine themselves in pain. However, the underlying neuronal processes remain poorly understood. Prior research has focused on empathy for pain or reported small sample sizes. Thus, the present study aimed to promote the neurobiological understanding of self-referential pain imagination. We hypothesised to find activation contrasts (pain vs. no pain) across pain-related areas and expected two of the most prominent predictors of chronic pain, pain sensitivity (PS) and locus of control (LoC), to be moderators.</p><p>In an fMRI study, <em>N</em> = 82 participants completed a pain imagination task, in which they were asked to imagine themselves in painful and non-painful situations presented in the form of pictures and texts. After each trial, they were instructed to give painfulness ratings. As a laboratory measure of PS, electrical pain thresholds were assessed. A questionnaire was completed to measure LoC.</p><p>Across presentation modes we found activity contrasts in previously pain-related regions, such as the prefrontal, supplementary motor, primary motor, somatosensory and posterior parietal cortices, and the cerebellum. We found positive associations of PS and external LoC with painfulness ratings, and a negative correlation between PS and internal LoC. Despite our hypotheses, neither PS nor internal LoC were significant predictors of the BOLD-signal contrasts.</p><p>Though future studies are needed to draw further conclusions, our results provide preliminary evidence of a potential neuronal imagination-perception overlap in pain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurobiology of Pain\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X24000096/pdfft?md5=8a9c2603322477b07469a22e7aeb5eea&pid=1-s2.0-S2452073X24000096-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurobiology of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X24000096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X24000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床评估和疼痛治疗中,患者会被要求想象自己处于疼痛之中。然而,人们对其背后的神经元过程仍然知之甚少。之前的研究主要集中在对疼痛的移情方面,或者报告的样本量较小。因此,本研究旨在促进对自我疼痛想象的神经生物学理解。我们假设会发现疼痛相关区域的激活对比(疼痛与无痛),并预期慢性疼痛最主要的两个预测因素--疼痛敏感性(PS)和控制点(LoC)会成为调节因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuronal activation patterns during self-referential pain imagination

In clinical assessments and pain therapy, patients are asked to imagine themselves in pain. However, the underlying neuronal processes remain poorly understood. Prior research has focused on empathy for pain or reported small sample sizes. Thus, the present study aimed to promote the neurobiological understanding of self-referential pain imagination. We hypothesised to find activation contrasts (pain vs. no pain) across pain-related areas and expected two of the most prominent predictors of chronic pain, pain sensitivity (PS) and locus of control (LoC), to be moderators.

In an fMRI study, N = 82 participants completed a pain imagination task, in which they were asked to imagine themselves in painful and non-painful situations presented in the form of pictures and texts. After each trial, they were instructed to give painfulness ratings. As a laboratory measure of PS, electrical pain thresholds were assessed. A questionnaire was completed to measure LoC.

Across presentation modes we found activity contrasts in previously pain-related regions, such as the prefrontal, supplementary motor, primary motor, somatosensory and posterior parietal cortices, and the cerebellum. We found positive associations of PS and external LoC with painfulness ratings, and a negative correlation between PS and internal LoC. Despite our hypotheses, neither PS nor internal LoC were significant predictors of the BOLD-signal contrasts.

Though future studies are needed to draw further conclusions, our results provide preliminary evidence of a potential neuronal imagination-perception overlap in pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Pain
Neurobiology of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信