极地海冰的最佳控制如何取决于其临界点

Parvathi Kooloth, Jian Lu, Craig Bakker, Derek DeSantis, Adam Rupe
{"title":"极地海冰的最佳控制如何取决于其临界点","authors":"Parvathi Kooloth, Jian Lu, Craig Bakker, Derek DeSantis, Adam Rupe","doi":"arxiv-2407.17357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several Earth system components are at a high risk of undergoing rapid and\nirreversible qualitative changes or `tipping', due to increasing climate\nwarming. Potential tipping elements include Arctic sea-ice, Atlantic meridional\noverturning circulation, and tropical coral reefs. Amidst such immediate\nconcerns, it has become necessary to investigate the feasibility of arresting\nor even reversing the crossing of tipping thresholds using feedback control. In\nthis paper, we study the control of an idealized diffusive energy balance model\n(EBM) for the Earth's climate; this model has two tipping points due to strong\nco-albedo feedback. One of these tipping points is a `small icecap' instability\nresponsible for a rapid transition to an ice-free climate state under\nincreasing greenhouse gas (GHG) forcing. We develop an optimal control strategy\nfor the EBM under different climate forcing scenarios with the goal of\nreversing sea ice loss while minimizing costs. We find that effective control\nis achievable for such a system, but the cost of reversing sea-ice loss nearly\nquadruples for an initial state that has just tipped as compared to a state\nbefore reaching the tipping point. We also show that thermal inertia may delay\ntipping leading to an overshoot of the critical GHG forcing threshold. This may\noffer a short intervention window (overshoot window) during which the control\nrequired to reverse sea-ice loss only scales linearly with intervention time.\nWhile systems with larger system inertia may have longer overshoot windows,\nthis increased elbow room comes with a steeper rise in the requisite control\nonce the intervention is delayed past this window. Additionally, we find that\nthe requisite control to restore sea-ice is localized in the polar region.","PeriodicalId":501166,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How optimal control of polar sea-ice depends on its tipping points\",\"authors\":\"Parvathi Kooloth, Jian Lu, Craig Bakker, Derek DeSantis, Adam Rupe\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.17357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several Earth system components are at a high risk of undergoing rapid and\\nirreversible qualitative changes or `tipping', due to increasing climate\\nwarming. Potential tipping elements include Arctic sea-ice, Atlantic meridional\\noverturning circulation, and tropical coral reefs. Amidst such immediate\\nconcerns, it has become necessary to investigate the feasibility of arresting\\nor even reversing the crossing of tipping thresholds using feedback control. In\\nthis paper, we study the control of an idealized diffusive energy balance model\\n(EBM) for the Earth's climate; this model has two tipping points due to strong\\nco-albedo feedback. One of these tipping points is a `small icecap' instability\\nresponsible for a rapid transition to an ice-free climate state under\\nincreasing greenhouse gas (GHG) forcing. We develop an optimal control strategy\\nfor the EBM under different climate forcing scenarios with the goal of\\nreversing sea ice loss while minimizing costs. We find that effective control\\nis achievable for such a system, but the cost of reversing sea-ice loss nearly\\nquadruples for an initial state that has just tipped as compared to a state\\nbefore reaching the tipping point. We also show that thermal inertia may delay\\ntipping leading to an overshoot of the critical GHG forcing threshold. This may\\noffer a short intervention window (overshoot window) during which the control\\nrequired to reverse sea-ice loss only scales linearly with intervention time.\\nWhile systems with larger system inertia may have longer overshoot windows,\\nthis increased elbow room comes with a steeper rise in the requisite control\\nonce the intervention is delayed past this window. Additionally, we find that\\nthe requisite control to restore sea-ice is localized in the polar region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于气候变暖加剧,地球系统的若干组成部分极有可能发生快速且可逆的质变或 "倾覆"。潜在的临界要素包括北极海冰、大西洋经向翻转环流和热带珊瑚礁。面对这些紧迫问题,有必要研究利用反馈控制阻止甚至逆转跨越临界点的可行性。在本文中,我们研究了一个理想化的地球气候扩散能量平衡模型(EBM)的控制问题。其中一个临界点是 "小冰帽 "不稳定性,负责在温室气体(GHG)强迫增加的情况下快速过渡到无冰气候状态。我们为不同气候强迫情景下的 EBM 制定了优化控制策略,目标是在最小化成本的同时逆转海冰损失。我们发现,对于这样一个系统,有效的控制是可以实现的,但是与达到临界点之前的状态相比,对于刚刚达到临界点的初始状态,逆转海冰损失的成本几乎翻了两番。我们还表明,热惯性可能会延迟临界点的到来,从而导致温室气体强迫临界点的过冲。这可能会提供一个较短的干预窗口(过冲窗口),在此期间,扭转海冰损失所需的控制力仅与干预时间成线性比例。虽然系统惯性较大的系统可能会有更长的过冲窗口,但一旦干预延迟到过冲窗口之后,所需的控制力也会随之陡增。此外,我们发现恢复海冰所需的控制力集中在极地区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How optimal control of polar sea-ice depends on its tipping points
Several Earth system components are at a high risk of undergoing rapid and irreversible qualitative changes or `tipping', due to increasing climate warming. Potential tipping elements include Arctic sea-ice, Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, and tropical coral reefs. Amidst such immediate concerns, it has become necessary to investigate the feasibility of arresting or even reversing the crossing of tipping thresholds using feedback control. In this paper, we study the control of an idealized diffusive energy balance model (EBM) for the Earth's climate; this model has two tipping points due to strong co-albedo feedback. One of these tipping points is a `small icecap' instability responsible for a rapid transition to an ice-free climate state under increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) forcing. We develop an optimal control strategy for the EBM under different climate forcing scenarios with the goal of reversing sea ice loss while minimizing costs. We find that effective control is achievable for such a system, but the cost of reversing sea-ice loss nearly quadruples for an initial state that has just tipped as compared to a state before reaching the tipping point. We also show that thermal inertia may delay tipping leading to an overshoot of the critical GHG forcing threshold. This may offer a short intervention window (overshoot window) during which the control required to reverse sea-ice loss only scales linearly with intervention time. While systems with larger system inertia may have longer overshoot windows, this increased elbow room comes with a steeper rise in the requisite control once the intervention is delayed past this window. Additionally, we find that the requisite control to restore sea-ice is localized in the polar region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信