苯二氮卓/Z-药物和阿片类药物共同使用模式及用药过量风险定性研究:对未来政策和实践的启示

Hannah Family, Gabriele Vojt, Hannah Poulter, Chris Bailey, Ana Paula Abdala Sheikh, Damiana Cavallo, Sara Karimi, Nick Booth, Peter Da Silva, Louise Aitken, Samantha Stewart, Matthew Hickman, Graeme Henderson, Jenny Scott, Joanna Kesten
{"title":"苯二氮卓/Z-药物和阿片类药物共同使用模式及用药过量风险定性研究:对未来政策和实践的启示","authors":"Hannah Family, Gabriele Vojt, Hannah Poulter, Chris Bailey, Ana Paula Abdala Sheikh, Damiana Cavallo, Sara Karimi, Nick Booth, Peter Da Silva, Louise Aitken, Samantha Stewart, Matthew Hickman, Graeme Henderson, Jenny Scott, Joanna Kesten","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.26.24311053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Co-use of benzodiazepines and/or 'z-drugs' along with opioids is linked to the rise in drug related deaths (DRD) in the UK. Understanding patterns of co-use could inform harm reduction strategies for reducing DRDs. This study explored how people co-use, including dosages, timings, methods of administration, use of other substances and desired effects sought. Methods Forty-eight semi-structured interviews across Glasgow in Scotland (n=28), Bristol (n=10) and Teesside (n=10) in England with individuals who co-use illicit and/or prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines/z-drugs were conducted. Eighteen interviews were co-facilitated with qualitatively trained local peer researchers. Interviews were analysed using the Framework method. Results Six co-use patterns were generated: (1) co-use to aid sleep or come down, (2) curated co-use, opioid agonist therapy (OAT) only (3) morning and evening benzodiazepine doses with opioids throughout the day (4) co-use binges (5) co-use throughout the day, (6) benzodiazepine use throughout the day plus OAT. Patterns one to three reflected more controlled co-use with a focus on self-medicating to give confidence, manage anxiety, promote sleep and come-down from cocaine/ketamine. Patterns four to six involved greater poly-drug use, and less controlled co-use with a focus on seeking euphoria (\"warm glow\", \"gouching out\") or oblivion (to escape untreated mental health conditions and trauma). Patterns two, three, five and six involved daily co-use. People switched between patterns depending on available resources (e.g. finances) or changes to prescriptions (opioids or benzodiazepines). Near-fatal overdoses were reported by participants across all co-use patterns. Patterns four to six were conceptualised as presenting greater overdose risk due to less controlled co-use and more extensive polydrug use. Conclusions The patterns identified provide opportunities for future harm reduction strategies, tailoring advice, updated prescribing guidance and policies, and the need for better access to mental health care, for people who co-use benzodiazepines and opioids to reduce DRDs.","PeriodicalId":501282,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Addiction Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative study of Benzodiazepine/Z-drug and Opioid co-use patterns and overdose risk: insights for future policy and practice\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Family, Gabriele Vojt, Hannah Poulter, Chris Bailey, Ana Paula Abdala Sheikh, Damiana Cavallo, Sara Karimi, Nick Booth, Peter Da Silva, Louise Aitken, Samantha Stewart, Matthew Hickman, Graeme Henderson, Jenny Scott, Joanna Kesten\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.26.24311053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Co-use of benzodiazepines and/or 'z-drugs' along with opioids is linked to the rise in drug related deaths (DRD) in the UK. Understanding patterns of co-use could inform harm reduction strategies for reducing DRDs. This study explored how people co-use, including dosages, timings, methods of administration, use of other substances and desired effects sought. Methods Forty-eight semi-structured interviews across Glasgow in Scotland (n=28), Bristol (n=10) and Teesside (n=10) in England with individuals who co-use illicit and/or prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines/z-drugs were conducted. Eighteen interviews were co-facilitated with qualitatively trained local peer researchers. Interviews were analysed using the Framework method. Results Six co-use patterns were generated: (1) co-use to aid sleep or come down, (2) curated co-use, opioid agonist therapy (OAT) only (3) morning and evening benzodiazepine doses with opioids throughout the day (4) co-use binges (5) co-use throughout the day, (6) benzodiazepine use throughout the day plus OAT. Patterns one to three reflected more controlled co-use with a focus on self-medicating to give confidence, manage anxiety, promote sleep and come-down from cocaine/ketamine. Patterns four to six involved greater poly-drug use, and less controlled co-use with a focus on seeking euphoria (\\\"warm glow\\\", \\\"gouching out\\\") or oblivion (to escape untreated mental health conditions and trauma). Patterns two, three, five and six involved daily co-use. People switched between patterns depending on available resources (e.g. finances) or changes to prescriptions (opioids or benzodiazepines). Near-fatal overdoses were reported by participants across all co-use patterns. Patterns four to six were conceptualised as presenting greater overdose risk due to less controlled co-use and more extensive polydrug use. Conclusions The patterns identified provide opportunities for future harm reduction strategies, tailoring advice, updated prescribing guidance and policies, and the need for better access to mental health care, for people who co-use benzodiazepines and opioids to reduce DRDs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Addiction Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Addiction Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.26.24311053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.26.24311053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 在英国,苯二氮卓和/或 "z-药物 "与阿片类药物的共同使用与药物相关死亡(DRD)的上升有关。了解共同使用苯二氮卓和/或 "z类药物 "的模式可为减少DRD的减毒策略提供依据。本研究探讨了人们如何共同使用药物,包括剂量、时间、给药方法、其他药物的使用以及所寻求的预期效果。方法 在苏格兰格拉斯哥(28 人)、英格兰布里斯托尔(10 人)和提赛德(10 人)对共同使用非法和/或处方类阿片和苯并二氮杂卓/z 类药物的个人进行了 48 次半结构式访谈。在经过定性培训的当地同伴研究人员的共同协助下,进行了 18 次访谈。访谈采用框架法进行分析。结果 得出了六种共同用药模式:(1)为帮助睡眠或缓解而共同用药;(2)集中共同用药,仅阿片激动剂疗法(OAT);(3)早晚服用苯二氮卓类药物,全天服用阿片类药物;(4)共同用药狂欢;(5)全天共同用药;(6)全天服用苯二氮卓类药物,外加 OAT。模式一至三反映了更有控制的共同吸毒,重点是自我治疗,以增强信心、控制焦虑、促进睡眠和从可卡因/氯胺酮中解脱出来。模式四至六涉及更多的多种药物使用,以及较少的控制性共同使用,重点是寻求兴奋("温暖的光芒"、"昏昏欲睡")或忘我(以逃避未治疗的精神健康状况和创伤)。模式二、三、五和六涉及日常共同使用。人们根据可用资源(如资金)或处方(阿片类或苯二氮卓)的变化在不同模式之间切换。在所有共同使用模式中,参与者都报告了濒临死亡的过量使用情况。模式四至六被认为具有更大的用药过量风险,因为共同使用药物的控制程度较低,而且使用多种药物的范围更广。结论 所确定的模式为未来的减低伤害策略、有针对性的建议、最新的处方指导和政策提供了机会,同时也为同时使用苯二氮卓类药物和阿片类药物的人提供了更好的心理保健机会,以减少 DRDs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A qualitative study of Benzodiazepine/Z-drug and Opioid co-use patterns and overdose risk: insights for future policy and practice
Background Co-use of benzodiazepines and/or 'z-drugs' along with opioids is linked to the rise in drug related deaths (DRD) in the UK. Understanding patterns of co-use could inform harm reduction strategies for reducing DRDs. This study explored how people co-use, including dosages, timings, methods of administration, use of other substances and desired effects sought. Methods Forty-eight semi-structured interviews across Glasgow in Scotland (n=28), Bristol (n=10) and Teesside (n=10) in England with individuals who co-use illicit and/or prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines/z-drugs were conducted. Eighteen interviews were co-facilitated with qualitatively trained local peer researchers. Interviews were analysed using the Framework method. Results Six co-use patterns were generated: (1) co-use to aid sleep or come down, (2) curated co-use, opioid agonist therapy (OAT) only (3) morning and evening benzodiazepine doses with opioids throughout the day (4) co-use binges (5) co-use throughout the day, (6) benzodiazepine use throughout the day plus OAT. Patterns one to three reflected more controlled co-use with a focus on self-medicating to give confidence, manage anxiety, promote sleep and come-down from cocaine/ketamine. Patterns four to six involved greater poly-drug use, and less controlled co-use with a focus on seeking euphoria ("warm glow", "gouching out") or oblivion (to escape untreated mental health conditions and trauma). Patterns two, three, five and six involved daily co-use. People switched between patterns depending on available resources (e.g. finances) or changes to prescriptions (opioids or benzodiazepines). Near-fatal overdoses were reported by participants across all co-use patterns. Patterns four to six were conceptualised as presenting greater overdose risk due to less controlled co-use and more extensive polydrug use. Conclusions The patterns identified provide opportunities for future harm reduction strategies, tailoring advice, updated prescribing guidance and policies, and the need for better access to mental health care, for people who co-use benzodiazepines and opioids to reduce DRDs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信