Anette Kaagaard Kristensen, Martin Lund Kristensen, Eva Gemzøe Mikkelsen
{"title":"午餐欺凌：对不道德的社会化做法的研究","authors":"Anette Kaagaard Kristensen, Martin Lund Kristensen, Eva Gemzøe Mikkelsen","doi":"10.1108/ijoes-02-2024-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to explore the impact of social segregation and exclusionary workplace hazing during lunch breaks on newcomers’ relational quality during the early socialisation phase.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study draws on data from a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with recently employed nurses (<em>n</em> = 19) and nursing students (<em>n</em> = 42) about their workplace hazing experiences. The data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The analysis revealed two main themes: “feeling isolated” and “justifying self-exclusion.” Newcomers reported feeling humiliated when subjected to exclusionary hazing by experienced colleagues, leading to feelings of alienation and impacting their relationships with their new colleagues. Newcomers tended to distance themselves in various ways and justified this behaviour as a means of self-care.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper adds to the limited knowledge about the effects of newcomers’ exposure to workplace hazing during their early socialisation. It provides a relational perspective on the consequences of workplace hazing and explains how the social context influences the normative expectations of newcomers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42832,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ethics and Systems","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hazing for lunch: a study of unethical socialisation practices\",\"authors\":\"Anette Kaagaard Kristensen, Martin Lund Kristensen, Eva Gemzøe Mikkelsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijoes-02-2024-0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to explore the impact of social segregation and exclusionary workplace hazing during lunch breaks on newcomers’ relational quality during the early socialisation phase.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study draws on data from a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with recently employed nurses (<em>n</em> = 19) and nursing students (<em>n</em> = 42) about their workplace hazing experiences. The data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The analysis revealed two main themes: “feeling isolated” and “justifying self-exclusion.” Newcomers reported feeling humiliated when subjected to exclusionary hazing by experienced colleagues, leading to feelings of alienation and impacting their relationships with their new colleagues. Newcomers tended to distance themselves in various ways and justified this behaviour as a means of self-care.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper adds to the limited knowledge about the effects of newcomers’ exposure to workplace hazing during their early socialisation. It provides a relational perspective on the consequences of workplace hazing and explains how the social context influences the normative expectations of newcomers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":42832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Ethics and Systems\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Ethics and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-02-2024-0038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ethics and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-02-2024-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hazing for lunch: a study of unethical socialisation practices
Purpose
This paper aims to explore the impact of social segregation and exclusionary workplace hazing during lunch breaks on newcomers’ relational quality during the early socialisation phase.
Design/methodology/approach
This study draws on data from a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with recently employed nurses (n = 19) and nursing students (n = 42) about their workplace hazing experiences. The data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Findings
The analysis revealed two main themes: “feeling isolated” and “justifying self-exclusion.” Newcomers reported feeling humiliated when subjected to exclusionary hazing by experienced colleagues, leading to feelings of alienation and impacting their relationships with their new colleagues. Newcomers tended to distance themselves in various ways and justified this behaviour as a means of self-care.
Originality/value
This paper adds to the limited knowledge about the effects of newcomers’ exposure to workplace hazing during their early socialisation. It provides a relational perspective on the consequences of workplace hazing and explains how the social context influences the normative expectations of newcomers.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Ethics and Systems (formerly named Humanomics, the International Journal of Systems and Ethics) is a multidisciplinary journal publishing peer review research on issues of ethics and morality affecting socio-scientific systems in epistemological perspectives. The journal covers diverse areas of a socio-scientific nature. The focus is on disseminating the theory and practice of morality and ethics as a system-oriented study defined by inter-causality between critical variables of given problems.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
