Federico Echenique, Teddy Mekonnen, M. Bumin Yenmez
{"title":"作为专业选择的多样性","authors":"Federico Echenique, Teddy Mekonnen, M. Bumin Yenmez","doi":"arxiv-2407.17589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use majorization to model comparative diversity in school choice. A\npopulation of agents is more diverse than another population of agents if its\ndistribution over groups is less concentrated: being less concentrated takes a\nspecific mathematical meaning borrowed from the theory of majorization. We\nadapt the standard notion of majorization in order to favor arbitrary\ndistributional objectives, such as population-level distributions over\nrace/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. With school admissions in mind, we\naxiomatically characterize choice rules that are consistent with modified\nmajorization, and constitute a principled method for admitting a diverse\npopulation of students into a school. Two important advantages of our approach\nis that majorization provides a natural notion of diversity, and that our\naxioms are independent of any exogenous priority ordering. We compare our\nchoice rule to the leading proposal in the literature, ``reserves and quotas,''\nand find ours to be more flexible.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity in Choice as Majorization\",\"authors\":\"Federico Echenique, Teddy Mekonnen, M. Bumin Yenmez\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.17589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use majorization to model comparative diversity in school choice. A\\npopulation of agents is more diverse than another population of agents if its\\ndistribution over groups is less concentrated: being less concentrated takes a\\nspecific mathematical meaning borrowed from the theory of majorization. We\\nadapt the standard notion of majorization in order to favor arbitrary\\ndistributional objectives, such as population-level distributions over\\nrace/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. With school admissions in mind, we\\naxiomatically characterize choice rules that are consistent with modified\\nmajorization, and constitute a principled method for admitting a diverse\\npopulation of students into a school. Two important advantages of our approach\\nis that majorization provides a natural notion of diversity, and that our\\naxioms are independent of any exogenous priority ordering. We compare our\\nchoice rule to the leading proposal in the literature, ``reserves and quotas,''\\nand find ours to be more flexible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We use majorization to model comparative diversity in school choice. A
population of agents is more diverse than another population of agents if its
distribution over groups is less concentrated: being less concentrated takes a
specific mathematical meaning borrowed from the theory of majorization. We
adapt the standard notion of majorization in order to favor arbitrary
distributional objectives, such as population-level distributions over
race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. With school admissions in mind, we
axiomatically characterize choice rules that are consistent with modified
majorization, and constitute a principled method for admitting a diverse
population of students into a school. Two important advantages of our approach
is that majorization provides a natural notion of diversity, and that our
axioms are independent of any exogenous priority ordering. We compare our
choice rule to the leading proposal in the literature, ``reserves and quotas,''
and find ours to be more flexible.