作为专业选择的多样性

Federico Echenique, Teddy Mekonnen, M. Bumin Yenmez
{"title":"作为专业选择的多样性","authors":"Federico Echenique, Teddy Mekonnen, M. Bumin Yenmez","doi":"arxiv-2407.17589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use majorization to model comparative diversity in school choice. A\npopulation of agents is more diverse than another population of agents if its\ndistribution over groups is less concentrated: being less concentrated takes a\nspecific mathematical meaning borrowed from the theory of majorization. We\nadapt the standard notion of majorization in order to favor arbitrary\ndistributional objectives, such as population-level distributions over\nrace/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. With school admissions in mind, we\naxiomatically characterize choice rules that are consistent with modified\nmajorization, and constitute a principled method for admitting a diverse\npopulation of students into a school. Two important advantages of our approach\nis that majorization provides a natural notion of diversity, and that our\naxioms are independent of any exogenous priority ordering. We compare our\nchoice rule to the leading proposal in the literature, ``reserves and quotas,''\nand find ours to be more flexible.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity in Choice as Majorization\",\"authors\":\"Federico Echenique, Teddy Mekonnen, M. Bumin Yenmez\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.17589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use majorization to model comparative diversity in school choice. A\\npopulation of agents is more diverse than another population of agents if its\\ndistribution over groups is less concentrated: being less concentrated takes a\\nspecific mathematical meaning borrowed from the theory of majorization. We\\nadapt the standard notion of majorization in order to favor arbitrary\\ndistributional objectives, such as population-level distributions over\\nrace/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. With school admissions in mind, we\\naxiomatically characterize choice rules that are consistent with modified\\nmajorization, and constitute a principled method for admitting a diverse\\npopulation of students into a school. Two important advantages of our approach\\nis that majorization provides a natural notion of diversity, and that our\\naxioms are independent of any exogenous priority ordering. We compare our\\nchoice rule to the leading proposal in the literature, ``reserves and quotas,''\\nand find ours to be more flexible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们用 "专业化 "来模拟择校中的比较多样性。如果一个群体在不同群体间的分布集中程度较低,那么这个群体就比另一个群体更多样化:集中程度较低的数学含义借鉴了 "主要化 "理论。我们对标准的 "主要化 "概念进行了调整,以适应任意的分布目标,如种族/族裔或社会经济地位的人口分布。考虑到学校的录取问题,我们对与修正的专业化相一致的选择规则进行了标准化描述,并构成了一种将多样化的学生群体录取到学校的原则性方法。我们的方法有两个重要优势:专业化提供了一个自然的多样性概念;我们的公理与任何外生的优先排序无关。我们将我们的选择规则与文献中的主要建议 "保留和配额 "进行了比较,发现我们的规则更加灵活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diversity in Choice as Majorization
We use majorization to model comparative diversity in school choice. A population of agents is more diverse than another population of agents if its distribution over groups is less concentrated: being less concentrated takes a specific mathematical meaning borrowed from the theory of majorization. We adapt the standard notion of majorization in order to favor arbitrary distributional objectives, such as population-level distributions over race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. With school admissions in mind, we axiomatically characterize choice rules that are consistent with modified majorization, and constitute a principled method for admitting a diverse population of students into a school. Two important advantages of our approach is that majorization provides a natural notion of diversity, and that our axioms are independent of any exogenous priority ordering. We compare our choice rule to the leading proposal in the literature, ``reserves and quotas,'' and find ours to be more flexible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信