比较 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT 用于原发性醛固酮增多症分类的不同诊断标准

Shumin Yang, Xiangshuang Zhang, Furong He, Ying Song, Ying Jing, Jinbo Hu, Hang Shen, Aipin Zhang, Wenwen He, Zhengping Feng, Qifu Li, Hua Pang
{"title":"比较 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT 用于原发性醛固酮增多症分类的不同诊断标准","authors":"Shumin Yang, Xiangshuang Zhang, Furong He, Ying Song, Ying Jing, Jinbo Hu, Hang Shen, Aipin Zhang, Wenwen He, Zhengping Feng, Qifu Li, Hua Pang","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.26.24311092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: 68Ga-Pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an emerging method for the classifying primary aldosteronism (PA). How to use this method for PA classification is still controversial. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients with PA who underwent PET/CT. These patients had a classification diagnosis of unilateral PA (UPA) or bilateral PA (BPA) based on adrenal venous sampling or post-surgical outcomes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity were used to analyze the accuracy of the lateralization index (LI) based on adrenal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), dominant side SUVmax adjusted by liver, dominant side of SUVmax and visual analysis.\nResults: A total of 208 PA patients were included, with 128 UPA and 80 BPA. The AUC for diagnosing UPA using LI and visual analysis were 0.82 [95% CI, 0.77-0.87] and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.87), respectively, higher than the dominant side of SUVmax [0.72, (95%CI, 0.65-0.78)] and dominant side SUVmax adjusted by liver [0.71, (95%CI, 0.64-0.77)]. Visual analysis showed a sensitivity of 0.73 (95%CI,0.65-0.81) and a specificity of 0.88(95%CI,0.80-0.95). The LI cutoff of 1.50 resulted the highest Youden Index of 0.59, with a sensitivity of 0.68 (95%CI,0.59-0.76) and a specificity of 0.91 (95%CI,0.83-0.96). When the LI cutoff was increased to 1.65, the sensitivity reduced to 0.61 (95%CI,0.53-0.70), while the specificity increased to 0.96 (95%CI,0.89-1.00). Conclusion: Both LI and visual analysis of PET/CT could be used in the classification diagnosis of PA. Nevertheless, visual analysis is more sensitive, and LI is more advantageous in specificity.","PeriodicalId":501419,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Diagnostic Criteria of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for the Classification of Primary Aldosteronism\",\"authors\":\"Shumin Yang, Xiangshuang Zhang, Furong He, Ying Song, Ying Jing, Jinbo Hu, Hang Shen, Aipin Zhang, Wenwen He, Zhengping Feng, Qifu Li, Hua Pang\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.26.24311092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: 68Ga-Pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an emerging method for the classifying primary aldosteronism (PA). How to use this method for PA classification is still controversial. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients with PA who underwent PET/CT. These patients had a classification diagnosis of unilateral PA (UPA) or bilateral PA (BPA) based on adrenal venous sampling or post-surgical outcomes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity were used to analyze the accuracy of the lateralization index (LI) based on adrenal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), dominant side SUVmax adjusted by liver, dominant side of SUVmax and visual analysis.\\nResults: A total of 208 PA patients were included, with 128 UPA and 80 BPA. The AUC for diagnosing UPA using LI and visual analysis were 0.82 [95% CI, 0.77-0.87] and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.87), respectively, higher than the dominant side of SUVmax [0.72, (95%CI, 0.65-0.78)] and dominant side SUVmax adjusted by liver [0.71, (95%CI, 0.64-0.77)]. Visual analysis showed a sensitivity of 0.73 (95%CI,0.65-0.81) and a specificity of 0.88(95%CI,0.80-0.95). The LI cutoff of 1.50 resulted the highest Youden Index of 0.59, with a sensitivity of 0.68 (95%CI,0.59-0.76) and a specificity of 0.91 (95%CI,0.83-0.96). When the LI cutoff was increased to 1.65, the sensitivity reduced to 0.61 (95%CI,0.53-0.70), while the specificity increased to 0.96 (95%CI,0.89-1.00). Conclusion: Both LI and visual analysis of PET/CT could be used in the classification diagnosis of PA. Nevertheless, visual analysis is more sensitive, and LI is more advantageous in specificity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.26.24311092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.26.24311092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:68Ga-Pentixafor 正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)是一种新兴的原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)分类方法。如何使用这种方法对 PA 进行分类仍存在争议。方法:对接受 PET/CT 检查的 PA 患者进行了一项回顾性研究。这些患者根据肾上腺静脉取样或手术后结果被分类诊断为单侧 PA(UPA)或双侧 PA(BPA)。根据肾上腺最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、经肝脏调整的优势侧 SUVmax、优势侧 SUVmax 和视觉分析,使用接收器操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、特异性和灵敏度分析侧化指数(LI)的准确性:共纳入 208 例 PA 患者,其中 128 例为 UPA,80 例为 BPA。使用LI和视觉分析诊断UPA的AUC分别为0.82 [95% CI, 0.77-0.87]和0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.87),高于优势侧SUVmax [0.72, (95%CI, 0.65-0.78)]和经肝脏调整的优势侧SUVmax [0.71, (95%CI, 0.64-0.77)]。视觉分析显示灵敏度为 0.73(95%CI,0.65-0.81),特异性为 0.88(95%CI,0.80-0.95)。LI 临界值为 1.50 时,尤登指数最高,为 0.59,灵敏度为 0.68(95%CI,0.59-0.76),特异度为 0.91(95%CI,0.83-0.96)。当 LI 临界值提高到 1.65 时,灵敏度降低到 0.61 (95%CI,0.53-0.70),而特异性则提高到 0.96 (95%CI,0.89-1.00)。结论PET/CT的LI分析和肉眼分析均可用于PA的分类诊断。不过,视觉分析的灵敏度更高,而LI在特异性方面更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Different Diagnostic Criteria of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for the Classification of Primary Aldosteronism
Background: 68Ga-Pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an emerging method for the classifying primary aldosteronism (PA). How to use this method for PA classification is still controversial. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients with PA who underwent PET/CT. These patients had a classification diagnosis of unilateral PA (UPA) or bilateral PA (BPA) based on adrenal venous sampling or post-surgical outcomes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity were used to analyze the accuracy of the lateralization index (LI) based on adrenal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), dominant side SUVmax adjusted by liver, dominant side of SUVmax and visual analysis. Results: A total of 208 PA patients were included, with 128 UPA and 80 BPA. The AUC for diagnosing UPA using LI and visual analysis were 0.82 [95% CI, 0.77-0.87] and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.87), respectively, higher than the dominant side of SUVmax [0.72, (95%CI, 0.65-0.78)] and dominant side SUVmax adjusted by liver [0.71, (95%CI, 0.64-0.77)]. Visual analysis showed a sensitivity of 0.73 (95%CI,0.65-0.81) and a specificity of 0.88(95%CI,0.80-0.95). The LI cutoff of 1.50 resulted the highest Youden Index of 0.59, with a sensitivity of 0.68 (95%CI,0.59-0.76) and a specificity of 0.91 (95%CI,0.83-0.96). When the LI cutoff was increased to 1.65, the sensitivity reduced to 0.61 (95%CI,0.53-0.70), while the specificity increased to 0.96 (95%CI,0.89-1.00). Conclusion: Both LI and visual analysis of PET/CT could be used in the classification diagnosis of PA. Nevertheless, visual analysis is more sensitive, and LI is more advantageous in specificity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信