{"title":"基于离群值和误差修正方法的新型混合方法,利用气象变量预测河流流量","authors":"Maha Shabbir, Sohail Chand, Farhat Iqbal","doi":"10.1007/s10651-024-00628-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A new hybrid approach for the river discharge prediction is proposed by integrating the Hampel filter (HF) with an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model and multi-model error correction method. This study applied the HF to detect and correct outliers present in the data. Then, the HF-treated data variables were employed in the ARDL model to obtain discharge predictions and errors were obtained. Next, a multi-model approach (named ASR) was used based on a combination of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) models to predict errors. The ASR-predicted errors were aggregated with HF-ARDL prediction to determine the final HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model predictions. The effectiveness of this approach was explored and compared with different models on the discharge data of four rivers of the Indus River basin of Pakistan. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Domel station) is 96.88 m<sup>3</sup>/s in the testing phase that is 53.92%, 50.0%, 48.7%, 50.0%, 13.4%, 53.2%, 50.3%, 46.4%, and 49.1% lower than the RMSE of the multiple linear regression (MLR), SVM, ANN, RF, ARDL, HF-MLR, HF-SVM, HF-ANN, and HF-RF models respectively. On test data, the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values of the suggested HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Chattar Kallas station) is 0.8571, Jhelum River (Domel) is 0.8294, Kabul River (Nowshera) is 0.8291 and Kunhar River (Talhata) is 0.8506. Therefore, the proposed HF-ARDL-ASR model has shown superior performance, lower errors, and higher prediction accuracy than all comparative models in the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50519,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","volume":"415 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel hybrid approach based on outlier and error correction methods to predict river discharge using meteorological variables\",\"authors\":\"Maha Shabbir, Sohail Chand, Farhat Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10651-024-00628-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A new hybrid approach for the river discharge prediction is proposed by integrating the Hampel filter (HF) with an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model and multi-model error correction method. This study applied the HF to detect and correct outliers present in the data. Then, the HF-treated data variables were employed in the ARDL model to obtain discharge predictions and errors were obtained. Next, a multi-model approach (named ASR) was used based on a combination of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) models to predict errors. The ASR-predicted errors were aggregated with HF-ARDL prediction to determine the final HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model predictions. The effectiveness of this approach was explored and compared with different models on the discharge data of four rivers of the Indus River basin of Pakistan. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Domel station) is 96.88 m<sup>3</sup>/s in the testing phase that is 53.92%, 50.0%, 48.7%, 50.0%, 13.4%, 53.2%, 50.3%, 46.4%, and 49.1% lower than the RMSE of the multiple linear regression (MLR), SVM, ANN, RF, ARDL, HF-MLR, HF-SVM, HF-ANN, and HF-RF models respectively. On test data, the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values of the suggested HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Chattar Kallas station) is 0.8571, Jhelum River (Domel) is 0.8294, Kabul River (Nowshera) is 0.8291 and Kunhar River (Talhata) is 0.8506. Therefore, the proposed HF-ARDL-ASR model has shown superior performance, lower errors, and higher prediction accuracy than all comparative models in the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Ecological Statistics\",\"volume\":\"415 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Ecological Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-024-00628-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-024-00628-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A novel hybrid approach based on outlier and error correction methods to predict river discharge using meteorological variables
A new hybrid approach for the river discharge prediction is proposed by integrating the Hampel filter (HF) with an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model and multi-model error correction method. This study applied the HF to detect and correct outliers present in the data. Then, the HF-treated data variables were employed in the ARDL model to obtain discharge predictions and errors were obtained. Next, a multi-model approach (named ASR) was used based on a combination of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) models to predict errors. The ASR-predicted errors were aggregated with HF-ARDL prediction to determine the final HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model predictions. The effectiveness of this approach was explored and compared with different models on the discharge data of four rivers of the Indus River basin of Pakistan. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Domel station) is 96.88 m3/s in the testing phase that is 53.92%, 50.0%, 48.7%, 50.0%, 13.4%, 53.2%, 50.3%, 46.4%, and 49.1% lower than the RMSE of the multiple linear regression (MLR), SVM, ANN, RF, ARDL, HF-MLR, HF-SVM, HF-ANN, and HF-RF models respectively. On test data, the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values of the suggested HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Chattar Kallas station) is 0.8571, Jhelum River (Domel) is 0.8294, Kabul River (Nowshera) is 0.8291 and Kunhar River (Talhata) is 0.8506. Therefore, the proposed HF-ARDL-ASR model has shown superior performance, lower errors, and higher prediction accuracy than all comparative models in the study.
期刊介绍:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics publishes papers on practical applications of statistics and related quantitative methods to environmental science addressing contemporary issues.
Emphasis is on applied mathematical statistics, statistical methodology, and data interpretation and improvement for future use, with a view to advance statistics for environment, ecology and environmental health, and to advance environmental theory and practice using valid statistics.
Besides clarity of exposition, a single most important criterion for publication is the appropriateness of the statistical method to the particular environmental problem. The Journal covers all aspects of the collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation of environmental data for research, policy and regulation. The Journal is cross-disciplinary within the context of contemporary environmental issues and the associated statistical tools, concepts and methods. The Journal broadly covers theory and methods, case studies and applications, environmental change and statistical ecology, environmental health statistics and stochastics, and related areas. Special features include invited discussion papers; research communications; technical notes and consultation corner; mini-reviews; letters to the Editor; news, views and announcements; hardware and software reviews; data management etc.