中重度智障儿童学习潜能动态测试:德尔菲研究

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
M. L. Eding, M. Meeter, C. Schuengel
{"title":"中重度智障儿童学习潜能动态测试:德尔菲研究","authors":"M. L. Eding,&nbsp;M. Meeter,&nbsp;C. Schuengel","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.12706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Education of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities requires adequate assessment of their educational needs and potential to learn. Dynamic testing using analogical reasoning tasks may be a promising way to perform such an assessment. However, it remains unclear how dynamic testing with these children may be done in practice. Therefore, we sought expert opinions on operationalizing learning potential and dynamic testing. We performed a three-round online Delphi study (<i>N</i> = 37) with experts in psychological educational assessment of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities in special schools and specialized day-care centres in the Netherlands. Consensus was found on a conceptual and an operational definition of learning potential, describing step-by-step how learning potential could be measured in daily practice. This included a pre-test, training, post-test design with the inclusion of a graduated prompts protocol for mediation and an observation checklist focussing on response to mediation. Based on examples from the Analogical Reasoning Learning Test, we assessed consensus on adapted design requirements for dynamic testing using analogical reasoning. Experts agreed that dynamic testing using analogical reasoning tasks might be suitable for children with moderate intellectual disabilities. A key concern was whether performance on analogical reasoning task was within reach of children with severe intellectual disabilities. The panel recommended research into the type of mediation needed to support the learning of analogical reasoning tasks. Further development and evaluation of dynamic testing for children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities may build on the recommendations of this panel of experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":"25 1","pages":"32-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.12706","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic testing of learning potential of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities: A Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"M. L. Eding,&nbsp;M. Meeter,&nbsp;C. Schuengel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-3802.12706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Education of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities requires adequate assessment of their educational needs and potential to learn. Dynamic testing using analogical reasoning tasks may be a promising way to perform such an assessment. However, it remains unclear how dynamic testing with these children may be done in practice. Therefore, we sought expert opinions on operationalizing learning potential and dynamic testing. We performed a three-round online Delphi study (<i>N</i> = 37) with experts in psychological educational assessment of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities in special schools and specialized day-care centres in the Netherlands. Consensus was found on a conceptual and an operational definition of learning potential, describing step-by-step how learning potential could be measured in daily practice. This included a pre-test, training, post-test design with the inclusion of a graduated prompts protocol for mediation and an observation checklist focussing on response to mediation. Based on examples from the Analogical Reasoning Learning Test, we assessed consensus on adapted design requirements for dynamic testing using analogical reasoning. Experts agreed that dynamic testing using analogical reasoning tasks might be suitable for children with moderate intellectual disabilities. A key concern was whether performance on analogical reasoning task was within reach of children with severe intellectual disabilities. The panel recommended research into the type of mediation needed to support the learning of analogical reasoning tasks. Further development and evaluation of dynamic testing for children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities may build on the recommendations of this panel of experts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"32-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.12706\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.12706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.12706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中重度智障儿童的教育需要对他们的教育需求和学习潜力进行充分的评估。使用类比推理任务进行动态测试,可能是进行此类评估的一种有前途的方法。然而,在实践中如何对这些儿童进行动态测试仍不清楚。因此,我们就学习潜能和动态测试的可操作性征求了专家的意见。我们与荷兰特殊学校和专门日托中心的中重度智障儿童心理教育评估专家进行了三轮在线德尔菲研究(N = 37)。研究就学习潜能的概念和操作定义达成了共识,并逐步描述了如何在日常实践中测量学习潜能。这包括一个前测、培训、后测的设计,其中包括一个用于调解的分级提示协议和一个侧重于调解反应的观察核对表。根据类比推理学习测试中的实例,我们对使用类比推理进行动态测试的适应性设计要求进行了评估,并达成了共识。专家们一致认为,使用类比推理任务进行动态测试可能适合中度智障儿童。一个关键问题是,重度智障儿童是否能够完成类比推理任务。专家小组建议对支持类比推理任务学习所需的中介类型进行研究。针对中度至重度智障儿童的动态测试的进一步发展和评估,可能会以该专家组的建议为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dynamic testing of learning potential of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities: A Delphi study

Dynamic testing of learning potential of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities: A Delphi study

Education of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities requires adequate assessment of their educational needs and potential to learn. Dynamic testing using analogical reasoning tasks may be a promising way to perform such an assessment. However, it remains unclear how dynamic testing with these children may be done in practice. Therefore, we sought expert opinions on operationalizing learning potential and dynamic testing. We performed a three-round online Delphi study (N = 37) with experts in psychological educational assessment of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities in special schools and specialized day-care centres in the Netherlands. Consensus was found on a conceptual and an operational definition of learning potential, describing step-by-step how learning potential could be measured in daily practice. This included a pre-test, training, post-test design with the inclusion of a graduated prompts protocol for mediation and an observation checklist focussing on response to mediation. Based on examples from the Analogical Reasoning Learning Test, we assessed consensus on adapted design requirements for dynamic testing using analogical reasoning. Experts agreed that dynamic testing using analogical reasoning tasks might be suitable for children with moderate intellectual disabilities. A key concern was whether performance on analogical reasoning task was within reach of children with severe intellectual disabilities. The panel recommended research into the type of mediation needed to support the learning of analogical reasoning tasks. Further development and evaluation of dynamic testing for children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities may build on the recommendations of this panel of experts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信