不同地点棘冠海星的摄食生物学特征

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
{"title":"不同地点棘冠海星的摄食生物学特征","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Crown-of-thorns seastars (COTS, <em>Acanthaster</em> spp.) are a major contributor to coral mortality across the Indo-Pacific and can cause extensive reef degradation. The diet preferences of COTS can influence coral community structure by predation on fast-growing genera such as <em>Acropora</em> and avoidance of rare coral genera. In non-outbreaking populations, this preference can increase species diversity. The feeding biology of <em>Acanthaster</em> cf. <em>solaris</em> was compared at two sites (Shark Alley and Second Lagoon) on One Tree Island reef, located in the southern Great Barrier Reef, to determine whether the availability of <em>Acropora</em> influences differences in COTS movement, feeding preference and feeding rates within the same reef system. <em>Acanthaster</em> cf. <em>solaris</em> were tracked daily for five days across both sites, with measurements of movement, feeding scars and coral composition recorded over this time. While Shark Alley and Second Lagoon have similar live coral cover (40 and 44 % respectively), Shark Alley has significantly lower <em>Acropora</em> availability than Second Lagoon (2 vs 32 %). The feeding rate of COTS was significantly different between Shark Alley and Second Lagoon (259.8 and 733.8 cm<sup>2</sup> of coral per day, respectively), but did not differ between seastar size (25–40 cm and &gt;40 cm). <em>Acanthaster</em> cf. <em>solaris</em> showed preference for <em>Pocillopora</em>, <em>Seriatopora</em>, <em>Acropora</em> and <em>Isopora</em> and an avoidance of <em>Porites</em> at both sites. The results suggest that for coral reef sites where <em>Acropora</em> is not dominant, COTS outbreaks may be less likely to initiate, with comparatively low feeding rates found in comparison to coral reefs where <em>Acropora</em> is dominant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18204,"journal":{"name":"Marine environmental research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113624003167/pdfft?md5=a4c34c4d367d37db834fa9a2839e2736&pid=1-s2.0-S0141113624003167-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeding biology of crown-of-thorns seastars across sites differing in Acropora availability\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Crown-of-thorns seastars (COTS, <em>Acanthaster</em> spp.) are a major contributor to coral mortality across the Indo-Pacific and can cause extensive reef degradation. The diet preferences of COTS can influence coral community structure by predation on fast-growing genera such as <em>Acropora</em> and avoidance of rare coral genera. In non-outbreaking populations, this preference can increase species diversity. The feeding biology of <em>Acanthaster</em> cf. <em>solaris</em> was compared at two sites (Shark Alley and Second Lagoon) on One Tree Island reef, located in the southern Great Barrier Reef, to determine whether the availability of <em>Acropora</em> influences differences in COTS movement, feeding preference and feeding rates within the same reef system. <em>Acanthaster</em> cf. <em>solaris</em> were tracked daily for five days across both sites, with measurements of movement, feeding scars and coral composition recorded over this time. While Shark Alley and Second Lagoon have similar live coral cover (40 and 44 % respectively), Shark Alley has significantly lower <em>Acropora</em> availability than Second Lagoon (2 vs 32 %). The feeding rate of COTS was significantly different between Shark Alley and Second Lagoon (259.8 and 733.8 cm<sup>2</sup> of coral per day, respectively), but did not differ between seastar size (25–40 cm and &gt;40 cm). <em>Acanthaster</em> cf. <em>solaris</em> showed preference for <em>Pocillopora</em>, <em>Seriatopora</em>, <em>Acropora</em> and <em>Isopora</em> and an avoidance of <em>Porites</em> at both sites. The results suggest that for coral reef sites where <em>Acropora</em> is not dominant, COTS outbreaks may be less likely to initiate, with comparatively low feeding rates found in comparison to coral reefs where <em>Acropora</em> is dominant.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine environmental research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113624003167/pdfft?md5=a4c34c4d367d37db834fa9a2839e2736&pid=1-s2.0-S0141113624003167-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine environmental research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113624003167\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine environmental research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113624003167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冠棘海星(COTS,属)是造成印度洋-太平洋地区珊瑚死亡的主要原因,可导致珊瑚礁大面积退化。冠棘海星对食物的偏好会影响珊瑚群落结构,因为它们会捕食快速生长的珊瑚属,如 "翠冠",并避开稀有珊瑚属。在非突变种群中,这种偏好会增加物种多样性。在位于大堡礁南部的一棵树岛珊瑚礁上的两个地点(鲨鱼巷和第二泻湖)对栉水母的觅食生物学进行了比较,以确定在同一珊瑚礁系统中,是否存在影响栉水母移动、觅食偏好和觅食率差异的因素。虽然鲨鱼巷和第二泻湖的活珊瑚覆盖率相似(分别为 40% 和 44%),但鲨鱼巷的可用率明显低于第二泻湖(2% 对 32%)。在鲨鱼巷和第二泻湖,COTS 的摄食率有显著差异(分别为每天摄食 259.8 厘米和 733.8 厘米珊瑚),但不同体型(25 - 40 厘米和大于 40 厘米)的海星摄食率并无差异。 在这两个地点,COTS 都表现出对 、 和 的偏好,而对 。研究结果表明,在海星不占优势的珊瑚礁地点,COTS爆发的可能性较小,与海星占优势的珊瑚礁相比,COTS的摄食率相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feeding biology of crown-of-thorns seastars across sites differing in Acropora availability

Crown-of-thorns seastars (COTS, Acanthaster spp.) are a major contributor to coral mortality across the Indo-Pacific and can cause extensive reef degradation. The diet preferences of COTS can influence coral community structure by predation on fast-growing genera such as Acropora and avoidance of rare coral genera. In non-outbreaking populations, this preference can increase species diversity. The feeding biology of Acanthaster cf. solaris was compared at two sites (Shark Alley and Second Lagoon) on One Tree Island reef, located in the southern Great Barrier Reef, to determine whether the availability of Acropora influences differences in COTS movement, feeding preference and feeding rates within the same reef system. Acanthaster cf. solaris were tracked daily for five days across both sites, with measurements of movement, feeding scars and coral composition recorded over this time. While Shark Alley and Second Lagoon have similar live coral cover (40 and 44 % respectively), Shark Alley has significantly lower Acropora availability than Second Lagoon (2 vs 32 %). The feeding rate of COTS was significantly different between Shark Alley and Second Lagoon (259.8 and 733.8 cm2 of coral per day, respectively), but did not differ between seastar size (25–40 cm and >40 cm). Acanthaster cf. solaris showed preference for Pocillopora, Seriatopora, Acropora and Isopora and an avoidance of Porites at both sites. The results suggest that for coral reef sites where Acropora is not dominant, COTS outbreaks may be less likely to initiate, with comparatively low feeding rates found in comparison to coral reefs where Acropora is dominant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine environmental research
Marine environmental research 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Marine Environmental Research publishes original research papers on chemical, physical, and biological interactions in the oceans and coastal waters. The journal serves as a forum for new information on biology, chemistry, and toxicology and syntheses that advance understanding of marine environmental processes. Submission of multidisciplinary studies is encouraged. Studies that utilize experimental approaches to clarify the roles of anthropogenic and natural causes of changes in marine ecosystems are especially welcome, as are those studies that represent new developments of a theoretical or conceptual aspect of marine science. All papers published in this journal are reviewed by qualified peers prior to acceptance and publication. Examples of topics considered to be appropriate for the journal include, but are not limited to, the following: – The extent, persistence, and consequences of change and the recovery from such change in natural marine systems – The biochemical, physiological, and ecological consequences of contaminants to marine organisms and ecosystems – The biogeochemistry of naturally occurring and anthropogenic substances – Models that describe and predict the above processes – Monitoring studies, to the extent that their results provide new information on functional processes – Methodological papers describing improved quantitative techniques for the marine sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信