美国的量子力学课程:量化教学时间、教学内容和所用范式

Alexis Buzzell, Ramón Barthelemy, Tim Atherton
{"title":"美国的量子力学课程:量化教学时间、教学内容和所用范式","authors":"Alexis Buzzell, Ramón Barthelemy, Tim Atherton","doi":"arxiv-2407.15977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantum mechanics is an integral course for physics students. An\nunderstanding of quantum concepts is imperative for enrollment in physics\ngraduate programs, participating in research within physics-fields, and\nemployment at companies developing quantum technologies. This study analyzes\n188 US research intensive institutions' course catalogs to determine the role\nand volume of quantum mechanics in their undergraduate physics programs. All of\nthe institutions required one course on quantum concepts, 92% required two\ncourses, and half required three. For institutions with complete class data\n(n=56), the quantum curriculum was analyzed using course syllabi. The mean\nnumber of classroom hours spent on quantum concepts was found to be 63.5 hours\nwith a standard deviation of 28.1 hours. The most commonly taught themes in the\nquantum curriculum were the Schr{\\\"o}dinger equation and three-dimensional\nquantum mechanics. However, the Stern-Gerlach Experiment was only included in\n28% of the course outlines. Despite current efforts to promote a spin-first\napproach, this study found the traditional position-first approaches were still\nmore common as they were used by 73.7% of instructors.","PeriodicalId":501565,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantum mechanics curriculum in the US: Quantifying the instructional time, content taught, and paradigms used\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Buzzell, Ramón Barthelemy, Tim Atherton\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.15977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantum mechanics is an integral course for physics students. An\\nunderstanding of quantum concepts is imperative for enrollment in physics\\ngraduate programs, participating in research within physics-fields, and\\nemployment at companies developing quantum technologies. This study analyzes\\n188 US research intensive institutions' course catalogs to determine the role\\nand volume of quantum mechanics in their undergraduate physics programs. All of\\nthe institutions required one course on quantum concepts, 92% required two\\ncourses, and half required three. For institutions with complete class data\\n(n=56), the quantum curriculum was analyzed using course syllabi. The mean\\nnumber of classroom hours spent on quantum concepts was found to be 63.5 hours\\nwith a standard deviation of 28.1 hours. The most commonly taught themes in the\\nquantum curriculum were the Schr{\\\\\\\"o}dinger equation and three-dimensional\\nquantum mechanics. However, the Stern-Gerlach Experiment was only included in\\n28% of the course outlines. Despite current efforts to promote a spin-first\\napproach, this study found the traditional position-first approaches were still\\nmore common as they were used by 73.7% of instructors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.15977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.15977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

量子力学是物理专业学生不可或缺的一门课程。了解量子概念对于报考物理学研究生课程、参与物理学领域的研究以及在开发量子技术的公司就业至关重要。本研究分析了 188 所美国研究密集型院校的课程目录,以确定量子力学在其本科物理课程中的作用和数量。所有院校都要求开设一门量子概念课程,92%的院校要求开设两门课程,半数院校要求开设三门课程。对于有完整课程数据的院校(n=56),我们使用课程大纲对量子课程进行了分析。结果发现,量子概念的平均课时数为 63.5 小时,标准偏差为 28.1 小时。量子课程中最常讲授的主题是薛定谔方程和三维量子力学。然而,只有28%的课程大纲中包含了斯特恩-格拉赫实验。尽管目前正努力推广自旋优先方法,但本研究发现,传统的位置优先方法仍然较为普遍,因为有73.7%的教师使用了这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantum mechanics curriculum in the US: Quantifying the instructional time, content taught, and paradigms used
Quantum mechanics is an integral course for physics students. An understanding of quantum concepts is imperative for enrollment in physics graduate programs, participating in research within physics-fields, and employment at companies developing quantum technologies. This study analyzes 188 US research intensive institutions' course catalogs to determine the role and volume of quantum mechanics in their undergraduate physics programs. All of the institutions required one course on quantum concepts, 92% required two courses, and half required three. For institutions with complete class data (n=56), the quantum curriculum was analyzed using course syllabi. The mean number of classroom hours spent on quantum concepts was found to be 63.5 hours with a standard deviation of 28.1 hours. The most commonly taught themes in the quantum curriculum were the Schr{\"o}dinger equation and three-dimensional quantum mechanics. However, the Stern-Gerlach Experiment was only included in 28% of the course outlines. Despite current efforts to promote a spin-first approach, this study found the traditional position-first approaches were still more common as they were used by 73.7% of instructors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信