{"title":"约翰-丹尼尔-梅茨格和康德所谓的人种","authors":"Joris van Gorkom","doi":"10.1111/1754-0208.12946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Around 1788, Johann Friedrich Blumenbach compiled a list of notable contributions to the discussion on Kant's concept of race. This list included references to Kant's second and third essays on race, Georg Forster's 1786 response, and two essays by Johann Daniel Metzger. Blumenbach's compilation stands in stark contrast to contemporary discussions of Kant's racial theories. Despite the increasing interest in this subject, Metzger's critiques are still largely unnoticed. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of eighteenth-century discussions on race, it is crucial to broaden our perspective beyond the viewpoints of Johann Gottfried Herder and Forster and include Metzger's contributions. In this article, I aim to elucidate (the context surrounding) Metzger's endeavours to engage with Kant's concept of race.</p>","PeriodicalId":55946,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","volume":"47 4","pages":"365-382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Johann Daniel Metzger and Kant's So-Called Human Races\",\"authors\":\"Joris van Gorkom\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-0208.12946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Around 1788, Johann Friedrich Blumenbach compiled a list of notable contributions to the discussion on Kant's concept of race. This list included references to Kant's second and third essays on race, Georg Forster's 1786 response, and two essays by Johann Daniel Metzger. Blumenbach's compilation stands in stark contrast to contemporary discussions of Kant's racial theories. Despite the increasing interest in this subject, Metzger's critiques are still largely unnoticed. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of eighteenth-century discussions on race, it is crucial to broaden our perspective beyond the viewpoints of Johann Gottfried Herder and Forster and include Metzger's contributions. In this article, I aim to elucidate (the context surrounding) Metzger's endeavours to engage with Kant's concept of race.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"365-382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-0208.12946\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-0208.12946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1788 年左右,约翰-弗里德里希-布卢门巴赫(Johann Friedrich Blumenbach)编制了一份清单,列出了对康德种族概念的讨论所做的重要贡献。这份清单提到了康德关于种族的第二和第三篇论文、格奥尔格-福斯特 1786 年的回应,以及约翰-丹尼尔-梅茨格的两篇论文。布卢门巴赫的汇编与当代关于康德种族理论的讨论形成了鲜明对比。尽管人们对这一主题的兴趣与日俱增,但梅茨格的批判在很大程度上仍未引起人们的注意。为了更全面地了解十八世纪关于种族的讨论,我们必须将视角从约翰-戈特弗里德-赫尔德(Johann Gottfried Herder)和福斯特(Forster)的观点扩大到梅茨格的贡献。在本文中,我旨在阐明梅茨格参与康德种族概念的努力(相关背景)。
Johann Daniel Metzger and Kant's So-Called Human Races
Around 1788, Johann Friedrich Blumenbach compiled a list of notable contributions to the discussion on Kant's concept of race. This list included references to Kant's second and third essays on race, Georg Forster's 1786 response, and two essays by Johann Daniel Metzger. Blumenbach's compilation stands in stark contrast to contemporary discussions of Kant's racial theories. Despite the increasing interest in this subject, Metzger's critiques are still largely unnoticed. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of eighteenth-century discussions on race, it is crucial to broaden our perspective beyond the viewpoints of Johann Gottfried Herder and Forster and include Metzger's contributions. In this article, I aim to elucidate (the context surrounding) Metzger's endeavours to engage with Kant's concept of race.