Martin Vu , Koen Degeling , Georgina L. Ryland , Oliver Hofmann , Ashley P. Ng , David Westerman , Maarten J. IJzerman
{"title":"全基因组测序和全转录组测序与常规诊断分子检测对 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病患者分层的经济影响。","authors":"Martin Vu , Koen Degeling , Georgina L. Ryland , Oliver Hofmann , Ashley P. Ng , David Westerman , Maarten J. IJzerman","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing (WGTS) can accurately distinguish B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) genomic subtypes. However, whether this is economically viable remains unclear. This study compared the direct costs and molecular subtype classification yield using different testing strategies for WGTS in adolescent and young adult/adult patients with B-ALL. These approaches were: (1) combined <em>BCR::ABL1</em> by fluorescence <em>in situ</em> hybridization (FISH) + WGTS for all patients; and (2) sequential <em>BCR::ABL1</em> FISH + WGTS contingent on initial <em>BCR::ABL1</em> FISH test outcome. The cost of routine diagnostic testing was estimated using Medicare or hospital fees, and the additional cost of WGTS was evaluated from the health care provider perspective using time-driven activity-based costing with resource identification elicited from experts. Molecular subtype classification yield data were derived from literature sources. Parameter uncertainty was assessed through deterministic sensitivity analysis; additional scenario analyses were performed. The total per patient cost of WGTS was $4319 (all costs reported in US dollars); consumables accounted for 74% of the overall cost, primarily driven by sequencing-related consumables. The incremental cost per additional patient categorized into molecular subtype was $8498 for combined <em>BCR::ABL1</em> FISH + WGTS for all patients and $5656 for initial <em>BCR::ABL1</em> FISH + WGTS for select patients compared with routine diagnostic testing. A reduction in the consumable costs of WGTS or an increase in the yield of molecular subtype classification is favorable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Impact of Whole Genome Sequencing and Whole Transcriptome Sequencing Versus Routine Diagnostic Molecular Testing to Stratify Patients with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia\",\"authors\":\"Martin Vu , Koen Degeling , Georgina L. Ryland , Oliver Hofmann , Ashley P. Ng , David Westerman , Maarten J. IJzerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing (WGTS) can accurately distinguish B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) genomic subtypes. However, whether this is economically viable remains unclear. This study compared the direct costs and molecular subtype classification yield using different testing strategies for WGTS in adolescent and young adult/adult patients with B-ALL. These approaches were: (1) combined <em>BCR::ABL1</em> by fluorescence <em>in situ</em> hybridization (FISH) + WGTS for all patients; and (2) sequential <em>BCR::ABL1</em> FISH + WGTS contingent on initial <em>BCR::ABL1</em> FISH test outcome. The cost of routine diagnostic testing was estimated using Medicare or hospital fees, and the additional cost of WGTS was evaluated from the health care provider perspective using time-driven activity-based costing with resource identification elicited from experts. Molecular subtype classification yield data were derived from literature sources. Parameter uncertainty was assessed through deterministic sensitivity analysis; additional scenario analyses were performed. The total per patient cost of WGTS was $4319 (all costs reported in US dollars); consumables accounted for 74% of the overall cost, primarily driven by sequencing-related consumables. The incremental cost per additional patient categorized into molecular subtype was $8498 for combined <em>BCR::ABL1</em> FISH + WGTS for all patients and $5656 for initial <em>BCR::ABL1</em> FISH + WGTS for select patients compared with routine diagnostic testing. A reduction in the consumable costs of WGTS or an increase in the yield of molecular subtype classification is favorable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824001028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
全基因组和全转录组测序(WGTS)可准确区分 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)基因组亚型。然而,这在经济上是否可行仍不清楚。本研究比较了在青少年和青年/成人 B-ALL 患者中使用不同 WGTS 检测策略的直接成本和分子亚型分类结果。这些方法是(1) 对所有患者采用荧光原位杂交(FISH)+ WGTS联合检测BCR::ABL1;(2) 根据最初的BCR::ABL1 FISH检测结果依次检测BCR::ABL1 FISH + WGTS。常规诊断检测的成本使用医疗保险或医院费用进行估算,WGTS 的额外成本从医疗服务提供者的角度进行评估,使用基于时间驱动活动的成本计算,并从专家处获得资源识别。分子亚型分类产量数据来自文献资料。通过确定性敏感性分析评估了参数的不确定性;还进行了其他情景分析。WGTS 每名患者的总成本为 4319 美元(所有成本均以美元为单位);耗材占总成本的 74%,主要由测序相关耗材造成。与常规诊断检测相比,对所有患者进行BCR::ABL1 FISH + WGTS联合检测每增加一名分子亚型患者的成本为8498美元,对部分患者进行初始BCR::ABL1 FISH + WGTS检测每增加一名分子亚型患者的成本为5656美元。降低 WGTS 的耗材成本或提高分子亚型分类的收益都是有利的。
Economic Impact of Whole Genome Sequencing and Whole Transcriptome Sequencing Versus Routine Diagnostic Molecular Testing to Stratify Patients with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing (WGTS) can accurately distinguish B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) genomic subtypes. However, whether this is economically viable remains unclear. This study compared the direct costs and molecular subtype classification yield using different testing strategies for WGTS in adolescent and young adult/adult patients with B-ALL. These approaches were: (1) combined BCR::ABL1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) + WGTS for all patients; and (2) sequential BCR::ABL1 FISH + WGTS contingent on initial BCR::ABL1 FISH test outcome. The cost of routine diagnostic testing was estimated using Medicare or hospital fees, and the additional cost of WGTS was evaluated from the health care provider perspective using time-driven activity-based costing with resource identification elicited from experts. Molecular subtype classification yield data were derived from literature sources. Parameter uncertainty was assessed through deterministic sensitivity analysis; additional scenario analyses were performed. The total per patient cost of WGTS was $4319 (all costs reported in US dollars); consumables accounted for 74% of the overall cost, primarily driven by sequencing-related consumables. The incremental cost per additional patient categorized into molecular subtype was $8498 for combined BCR::ABL1 FISH + WGTS for all patients and $5656 for initial BCR::ABL1 FISH + WGTS for select patients compared with routine diagnostic testing. A reduction in the consumable costs of WGTS or an increase in the yield of molecular subtype classification is favorable.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.