描述美国女性患雷特综合征的历程:利用雷特综合征自然史研究数据库进行的真实世界证据研究。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Damian May, Kalé Kponee-Shovein, Jeffrey L Neul, Alan K Percy, Malena Mahendran, Nathaniel Downes, Grace Chen, Talissa Watson, Dominique C Pichard, Melissa Kennedy, Patrick Lefebvre
{"title":"描述美国女性患雷特综合征的历程:利用雷特综合征自然史研究数据库进行的真实世界证据研究。","authors":"Damian May, Kalé Kponee-Shovein, Jeffrey L Neul, Alan K Percy, Malena Mahendran, Nathaniel Downes, Grace Chen, Talissa Watson, Dominique C Pichard, Melissa Kennedy, Patrick Lefebvre","doi":"10.1186/s11689-024-09557-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the advent of the first targeted therapy for Rett Syndrome (RTT), a comprehensive assessment of the journey of RTT is needed to elucidate on present unmet needs in this population. This study characterized females with RTT in the United States and their disease journey with respect to longitudinal treatment patterns, RTT-related outcomes, and changes in disease severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used registry data of females with RTT from the 5211 RTT Natural History Study (RNHS) (November 2015-July 2021). Pharmacological and supportive therapy use, RTT-related outcomes, and RTT severity, as measured by the Clinical Severity Scale and Motor Behavioral Assessment scale, were evaluated following the first RNHS visit. Analyses were conducted overall and in subgroups by RTT type (classic and atypical RTT) and age at first visit (pediatric and adult).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 455 females with RTT were included in the study, of whom 90.5% had classic RTT and 79.8% were pediatric individuals. Over a median follow-up of 4 years, use of pharmacological therapies, including prokinetic agents (42.7% vs. 28.3%), and supportive therapies, including physical therapy (87.3% vs. 40.2%) and speech-language therapy (86.8% vs. 23.9%), were more common in pediatric than adult individuals (all p < 0.05). Nearly half (44.6%) of all individuals had a hospital or emergency room visit, with a higher proportion of visits in individuals with classic RTT than atypical RTT and pediatric than adult individuals (both p = 0.001). An increasing trend in clinical severity was observed in pediatric individuals (mean change per year: 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03, 0.44), while an increasing trend in motor-behavioral dysfunction was observed in pediatric individuals (mean change per year: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.63, 1.60) and those with classic RTT (mean change per year: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from this study highlight the considerable burden of RTT across disease subtype and age. Despite reliance on supportive therapies and healthcare encounters, individuals with RTT experience increasing disease severity and motor-behavioral dysfunction in childhood and adolescence, underscoring the unmet needs of this population and the value of early intervention to manage RTT in the long-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":16530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":"16 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing the journey of Rett syndrome among females in the United States: a real-world evidence study using the Rett syndrome natural history study database.\",\"authors\":\"Damian May, Kalé Kponee-Shovein, Jeffrey L Neul, Alan K Percy, Malena Mahendran, Nathaniel Downes, Grace Chen, Talissa Watson, Dominique C Pichard, Melissa Kennedy, Patrick Lefebvre\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s11689-024-09557-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the advent of the first targeted therapy for Rett Syndrome (RTT), a comprehensive assessment of the journey of RTT is needed to elucidate on present unmet needs in this population. This study characterized females with RTT in the United States and their disease journey with respect to longitudinal treatment patterns, RTT-related outcomes, and changes in disease severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used registry data of females with RTT from the 5211 RTT Natural History Study (RNHS) (November 2015-July 2021). Pharmacological and supportive therapy use, RTT-related outcomes, and RTT severity, as measured by the Clinical Severity Scale and Motor Behavioral Assessment scale, were evaluated following the first RNHS visit. Analyses were conducted overall and in subgroups by RTT type (classic and atypical RTT) and age at first visit (pediatric and adult).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 455 females with RTT were included in the study, of whom 90.5% had classic RTT and 79.8% were pediatric individuals. Over a median follow-up of 4 years, use of pharmacological therapies, including prokinetic agents (42.7% vs. 28.3%), and supportive therapies, including physical therapy (87.3% vs. 40.2%) and speech-language therapy (86.8% vs. 23.9%), were more common in pediatric than adult individuals (all p < 0.05). Nearly half (44.6%) of all individuals had a hospital or emergency room visit, with a higher proportion of visits in individuals with classic RTT than atypical RTT and pediatric than adult individuals (both p = 0.001). An increasing trend in clinical severity was observed in pediatric individuals (mean change per year: 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03, 0.44), while an increasing trend in motor-behavioral dysfunction was observed in pediatric individuals (mean change per year: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.63, 1.60) and those with classic RTT (mean change per year: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from this study highlight the considerable burden of RTT across disease subtype and age. Despite reliance on supportive therapies and healthcare encounters, individuals with RTT experience increasing disease severity and motor-behavioral dysfunction in childhood and adolescence, underscoring the unmet needs of this population and the value of early intervention to manage RTT in the long-term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282812/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-024-09557-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-024-09557-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着第一种治疗雷特综合征(RTT)的靶向疗法的问世,需要对 RTT 的病程进行全面评估,以阐明这一人群目前尚未满足的需求。本研究从纵向治疗模式、RTT 相关结果和疾病严重程度变化等方面,对美国的 RTT 女性患者及其疾病历程进行了描述:这项回顾性队列研究使用了来自 5211 RTT 自然史研究(RNHS)(2015 年 11 月至 2021 年 7 月)的女性 RTT 患者登记数据。在首次接受 RNHS 访问后,对药物和支持疗法的使用情况、RTT 相关结果以及 RTT 严重程度(以临床严重程度量表和运动行为评估量表衡量)进行了评估。对总体情况进行了分析,并按RTT类型(典型和非典型RTT)和首次就诊时的年龄(儿童和成人)进行了分组分析:研究共纳入了 455 名女性 RTT 患者,其中 90.5% 为典型 RTT,79.8% 为儿童。在中位随访 4 年期间,儿科患者比成人患者更常使用药物疗法,包括促动力药(42.7% 对 28.3%),以及支持疗法,包括物理疗法(87.3% 对 40.2%)和语言疗法(86.8% 对 23.9%)(均为 p):本研究的结果凸显了不同疾病亚型和不同年龄段的 RTT 所带来的巨大负担。尽管依赖于支持性疗法和医疗保健,RTT 患者在童年和青少年时期的疾病严重程度和运动行为功能障碍仍在不断增加,这凸显了这一人群尚未得到满足的需求以及早期干预对长期管理 RTT 的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing the journey of Rett syndrome among females in the United States: a real-world evidence study using the Rett syndrome natural history study database.

Background: With the advent of the first targeted therapy for Rett Syndrome (RTT), a comprehensive assessment of the journey of RTT is needed to elucidate on present unmet needs in this population. This study characterized females with RTT in the United States and their disease journey with respect to longitudinal treatment patterns, RTT-related outcomes, and changes in disease severity.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used registry data of females with RTT from the 5211 RTT Natural History Study (RNHS) (November 2015-July 2021). Pharmacological and supportive therapy use, RTT-related outcomes, and RTT severity, as measured by the Clinical Severity Scale and Motor Behavioral Assessment scale, were evaluated following the first RNHS visit. Analyses were conducted overall and in subgroups by RTT type (classic and atypical RTT) and age at first visit (pediatric and adult).

Results: A total of 455 females with RTT were included in the study, of whom 90.5% had classic RTT and 79.8% were pediatric individuals. Over a median follow-up of 4 years, use of pharmacological therapies, including prokinetic agents (42.7% vs. 28.3%), and supportive therapies, including physical therapy (87.3% vs. 40.2%) and speech-language therapy (86.8% vs. 23.9%), were more common in pediatric than adult individuals (all p < 0.05). Nearly half (44.6%) of all individuals had a hospital or emergency room visit, with a higher proportion of visits in individuals with classic RTT than atypical RTT and pediatric than adult individuals (both p = 0.001). An increasing trend in clinical severity was observed in pediatric individuals (mean change per year: 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03, 0.44), while an increasing trend in motor-behavioral dysfunction was observed in pediatric individuals (mean change per year: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.63, 1.60) and those with classic RTT (mean change per year: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.41).

Conclusions: Findings from this study highlight the considerable burden of RTT across disease subtype and age. Despite reliance on supportive therapies and healthcare encounters, individuals with RTT experience increasing disease severity and motor-behavioral dysfunction in childhood and adolescence, underscoring the unmet needs of this population and the value of early intervention to manage RTT in the long-term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders is an open access journal that integrates current, cutting-edge research across a number of disciplines, including neurobiology, genetics, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology. The journal’s primary focus is on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders including autism, fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, Turner Syndrome, 22q Deletion Syndrome, Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndrome, Williams syndrome, lysosomal storage diseases, dyslexia, specific language impairment and fetal alcohol syndrome. With the discovery of specific genes underlying neurodevelopmental syndromes, the emergence of powerful tools for studying neural circuitry, and the development of new approaches for exploring molecular mechanisms, interdisciplinary research on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders is now increasingly common. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders provides a unique venue for researchers interested in comparing and contrasting mechanisms and characteristics related to the pathogenesis of the full range of neurodevelopmental disorders, sharpening our understanding of the etiology and relevant phenotypes of each condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信