针对急诊科高危病人的工作场所暴力预防计划。

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Son Chae Kim PhD, RN, Jennifer Kaiser PhD, RN, Tracy Hosford MSN, RN, Carol Sadate-Akhavi MSN, RN, Ashleigh Nurski MSN, RN, Thomas Bos BS, Chelsea Ciampa MSN, RN
{"title":"针对急诊科高危病人的工作场所暴力预防计划。","authors":"Son Chae Kim PhD, RN,&nbsp;Jennifer Kaiser PhD, RN,&nbsp;Tracy Hosford MSN, RN,&nbsp;Carol Sadate-Akhavi MSN, RN,&nbsp;Ashleigh Nurski MSN, RN,&nbsp;Thomas Bos BS,&nbsp;Chelsea Ciampa MSN, RN","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Patient violence in emergency departments (EDs) may be prevented with proactive mitigation measures targeting potentially violent patients. We aimed to evaluate the effects of two interventions guided by a validated risk-assessment tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective interventional study was conducted among patients ≥10 years who visited two EDs in Michigan, USA, from October 2022 to August 2023. During triage, the ED nurses completed the Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool for EDs (ABRAT-ED) to identify high-risk patients. Following the baseline observational period, interventions were implemented stepwise for the high-risk patients: phase 1 period with signage posting and phase 2 period with a proactive Behavioral Emergency Response Team (BERT) huddle added to the signage posting. Before ED disposition, any violent events and their severities were documented. The data were retrieved retrospectively after the study was completed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 77,424 evaluable patients, 546 had ≥1 violent event. The violent event rates were 0.93%, 0.68%, and 0.62% for baseline, phase 1, and phase 2, respectively. The relative risk of violent events for phase 1 compared to the baseline was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59‒0.90; <i>p </i>= 0.003). The relative risk for phase 2 compared to phase 1 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.76‒1.12; <i>p </i>= 0.418).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The use of signage posting as a persistent visual cue for high-risk patients identified by ABRAT-ED appears to be effective in reducing the overall violent event rates. However, adding proactive BERT huddle to signage posting showed no significant reduction in the violent event rates compared to signage posting alone.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A workplace violence prevention program targeting high-risk patients in emergency departments\",\"authors\":\"Son Chae Kim PhD, RN,&nbsp;Jennifer Kaiser PhD, RN,&nbsp;Tracy Hosford MSN, RN,&nbsp;Carol Sadate-Akhavi MSN, RN,&nbsp;Ashleigh Nurski MSN, RN,&nbsp;Thomas Bos BS,&nbsp;Chelsea Ciampa MSN, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/emp2.13206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patient violence in emergency departments (EDs) may be prevented with proactive mitigation measures targeting potentially violent patients. We aimed to evaluate the effects of two interventions guided by a validated risk-assessment tool.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A prospective interventional study was conducted among patients ≥10 years who visited two EDs in Michigan, USA, from October 2022 to August 2023. During triage, the ED nurses completed the Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool for EDs (ABRAT-ED) to identify high-risk patients. Following the baseline observational period, interventions were implemented stepwise for the high-risk patients: phase 1 period with signage posting and phase 2 period with a proactive Behavioral Emergency Response Team (BERT) huddle added to the signage posting. Before ED disposition, any violent events and their severities were documented. The data were retrieved retrospectively after the study was completed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 77,424 evaluable patients, 546 had ≥1 violent event. The violent event rates were 0.93%, 0.68%, and 0.62% for baseline, phase 1, and phase 2, respectively. The relative risk of violent events for phase 1 compared to the baseline was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59‒0.90; <i>p </i>= 0.003). The relative risk for phase 2 compared to phase 1 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.76‒1.12; <i>p </i>= 0.418).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of signage posting as a persistent visual cue for high-risk patients identified by ABRAT-ED appears to be effective in reducing the overall violent event rates. However, adding proactive BERT huddle to signage posting showed no significant reduction in the violent event rates compared to signage posting alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急诊科(ED)中的患者暴力事件可以通过针对潜在暴力患者的积极缓解措施加以预防。我们的目的是评估在经过验证的风险评估工具指导下采取的两种干预措施的效果:2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 8 月,我们在美国密歇根州的两家急诊室对年龄≥10 岁的患者进行了一项前瞻性干预研究。在分诊过程中,急诊室护士填写了急诊室攻击行为风险评估工具(ABRAT-ED),以识别高危患者。基线观察期结束后,对高危患者逐步实施干预措施:第一阶段张贴标语,第二阶段在张贴标语的基础上增加主动行为应急小组(BERT)集会。在急诊室处置之前,任何暴力事件及其严重程度都会被记录在案。研究结束后,对数据进行了回顾性检索:在 77,424 名可评估的患者中,有 546 人发生了≥1 起暴力事件。基线、第一阶段和第二阶段的暴力事件发生率分别为 0.93%、0.68% 和 0.62%。与基线相比,第 1 阶段发生暴力事件的相对风险为 0.73(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.59-0.90;P = 0.003)。与第一阶段相比,第二阶段的相对风险为 0.92 (95% CI: 0.76-1.12; p = 0.418):结论:对于 ABRAT-ED 识别出的高危患者,使用标牌张贴作为持续的视觉提示似乎能有效降低总体暴力事件发生率。然而,与单独张贴标识牌相比,在张贴标识牌的基础上增加积极主动的 BERT Huddle,并不能显著降低暴力事件发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A workplace violence prevention program targeting high-risk patients in emergency departments

A workplace violence prevention program targeting high-risk patients in emergency departments

Objective

Patient violence in emergency departments (EDs) may be prevented with proactive mitigation measures targeting potentially violent patients. We aimed to evaluate the effects of two interventions guided by a validated risk-assessment tool.

Methods

A prospective interventional study was conducted among patients ≥10 years who visited two EDs in Michigan, USA, from October 2022 to August 2023. During triage, the ED nurses completed the Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool for EDs (ABRAT-ED) to identify high-risk patients. Following the baseline observational period, interventions were implemented stepwise for the high-risk patients: phase 1 period with signage posting and phase 2 period with a proactive Behavioral Emergency Response Team (BERT) huddle added to the signage posting. Before ED disposition, any violent events and their severities were documented. The data were retrieved retrospectively after the study was completed.

Results

Of 77,424 evaluable patients, 546 had ≥1 violent event. The violent event rates were 0.93%, 0.68%, and 0.62% for baseline, phase 1, and phase 2, respectively. The relative risk of violent events for phase 1 compared to the baseline was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59‒0.90; = 0.003). The relative risk for phase 2 compared to phase 1 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.76‒1.12; = 0.418).

Conclusion

The use of signage posting as a persistent visual cue for high-risk patients identified by ABRAT-ED appears to be effective in reducing the overall violent event rates. However, adding proactive BERT huddle to signage posting showed no significant reduction in the violent event rates compared to signage posting alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信