数字健康政策解码:利用多纳贝迪恩模型绘制国家战略图。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tahereh Saheb , Tayebeh Saheb
{"title":"数字健康政策解码:利用多纳贝迪恩模型绘制国家战略图。","authors":"Tahereh Saheb ,&nbsp;Tayebeh Saheb","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>National strategies are essential driving forces behind governments taking responsibility for setting the direction of digital health on a national level. This study employed a novel mixed-methods approach, integrating topic modeling, co-occurrence analysis, and qualitative content analysis, to comprehensively examine 22 national digital health strategies through the lens of Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model. The quantitative analysis identified 14 prevalent topics, while the qualitative analysis provided nuanced insights into the contexts underlying these topics. Leveraging Donabedian's framework, the topics were categorized into structure (training and digital health professionals, governance frameworks, computing infrastructure, public-private partnerships, regulatory frameworks), process (AI and big data, decision-support systems, shared digital health records, disease surveillance, information system interoperability), and outcome dimensions (improved health and social care, privacy and security, quality and efficiency of health services, universal coverage, sustainable development goals). This hybrid methodology offers a unique contribution by mapping the identified themes onto a widely accepted quality of care model, bridging the gap between policy analysis and healthcare quality assessment. The study unveils underaddressed themes, highlights the interrelationships between policy components, and provides a comprehensive understanding of the global digital health policy landscape. The findings inform future strategies, academic research directions, and potential policy considerations for governments formulating digital health regulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 105134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital health policy decoded: Mapping national strategies using Donabedian's model\",\"authors\":\"Tahereh Saheb ,&nbsp;Tayebeh Saheb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>National strategies are essential driving forces behind governments taking responsibility for setting the direction of digital health on a national level. This study employed a novel mixed-methods approach, integrating topic modeling, co-occurrence analysis, and qualitative content analysis, to comprehensively examine 22 national digital health strategies through the lens of Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model. The quantitative analysis identified 14 prevalent topics, while the qualitative analysis provided nuanced insights into the contexts underlying these topics. Leveraging Donabedian's framework, the topics were categorized into structure (training and digital health professionals, governance frameworks, computing infrastructure, public-private partnerships, regulatory frameworks), process (AI and big data, decision-support systems, shared digital health records, disease surveillance, information system interoperability), and outcome dimensions (improved health and social care, privacy and security, quality and efficiency of health services, universal coverage, sustainable development goals). This hybrid methodology offers a unique contribution by mapping the identified themes onto a widely accepted quality of care model, bridging the gap between policy analysis and healthcare quality assessment. The study unveils underaddressed themes, highlights the interrelationships between policy components, and provides a comprehensive understanding of the global digital health policy landscape. The findings inform future strategies, academic research directions, and potential policy considerations for governments formulating digital health regulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001441\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家战略是政府在国家层面确定数字健康发展方向的重要推动力。本研究采用了一种新颖的混合方法,整合了主题建模、共现分析和定性内容分析,通过多纳贝迪恩的结构-过程-结果模型,对 22 个国家的数字健康战略进行了全面研究。定量分析确定了 14 个普遍存在的主题,而定性分析则提供了对这些主题背后背景的细微洞察。利用多纳贝迪恩的框架,这些主题被分为结构(培训和数字医疗专业人员、治理框架、计算基础设施、公私合作伙伴关系、监管框架)、过程(人工智能和大数据、决策支持系统、共享数字健康记录、疾病监测、信息系统互操作性)和结果维度(改善医疗和社会护理、隐私和安全、医疗服务的质量和效率、全民覆盖、可持续发展目标)。这种混合方法将已确定的主题映射到广为接受的医疗质量模型中,弥合了政策分析与医疗质量评估之间的差距,从而做出了独特的贡献。该研究揭示了未得到充分关注的主题,强调了政策组成部分之间的相互关系,并提供了对全球数字医疗政策环境的全面了解。研究结果为政府制定数字医疗法规提供了未来战略、学术研究方向和潜在的政策考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital health policy decoded: Mapping national strategies using Donabedian's model

National strategies are essential driving forces behind governments taking responsibility for setting the direction of digital health on a national level. This study employed a novel mixed-methods approach, integrating topic modeling, co-occurrence analysis, and qualitative content analysis, to comprehensively examine 22 national digital health strategies through the lens of Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model. The quantitative analysis identified 14 prevalent topics, while the qualitative analysis provided nuanced insights into the contexts underlying these topics. Leveraging Donabedian's framework, the topics were categorized into structure (training and digital health professionals, governance frameworks, computing infrastructure, public-private partnerships, regulatory frameworks), process (AI and big data, decision-support systems, shared digital health records, disease surveillance, information system interoperability), and outcome dimensions (improved health and social care, privacy and security, quality and efficiency of health services, universal coverage, sustainable development goals). This hybrid methodology offers a unique contribution by mapping the identified themes onto a widely accepted quality of care model, bridging the gap between policy analysis and healthcare quality assessment. The study unveils underaddressed themes, highlights the interrelationships between policy components, and provides a comprehensive understanding of the global digital health policy landscape. The findings inform future strategies, academic research directions, and potential policy considerations for governments formulating digital health regulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信