安静戒烟理由和行为量表的设计与开发过程。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ismet Çelebi, Emrah Gökkaya, Adeviye Çopur, Elçin Balci
{"title":"安静戒烟理由和行为量表的设计与开发过程。","authors":"Ismet Çelebi, Emrah Gökkaya, Adeviye Çopur, Elçin Balci","doi":"10.3233/WOR-230699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept of \"Quiet Quitting\", which might be considered new in the literature, is used to describe a passive and silent giving up.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop a scale to evaluate both the causes and consequences of \"quiet quitting\" which is believed to be increasing for various reasons in our country as well as in the world.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five-stage scale development method which was presented by Cohen and Swerdik was used in the process of developing the Quiet Quitting Reason and Behavior Scale (QQRBS). First, the conceptual structure of the scale was determined. In the second stage, the scale was structured. Structuring the scale is deciding on the scale type and scaling technique. The third stage is the first application of the scale. After the scale was applied, factor analysis, internal consistency assessment and validity studies were carried out in the item analysis section, which is the fourth stage. The fifth stage is the second application stage of the scale and at this stage, the scale was reviewed by test-retest and an application guideline was prepared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha value of draft items is 0.87, quiet quitting behavior sub-dimension Cronbach's Alpha value is 0.76 and reasons for quiet quitting Cronbach's Alpha value is 0.820. It was decided to keep the remaining 35 items after EFA analysis because the corrected correlation numbers of the items were >0.30. This study explains the design and development process of the QQRBS in Turkish society.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to this developed scale, as the scale mean score of the total and sub-dimensions increases, the tendency to quiet quitting increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quiet Quitting reason and behavior scale design and development process.\",\"authors\":\"Ismet Çelebi, Emrah Gökkaya, Adeviye Çopur, Elçin Balci\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/WOR-230699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept of \\\"Quiet Quitting\\\", which might be considered new in the literature, is used to describe a passive and silent giving up.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop a scale to evaluate both the causes and consequences of \\\"quiet quitting\\\" which is believed to be increasing for various reasons in our country as well as in the world.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five-stage scale development method which was presented by Cohen and Swerdik was used in the process of developing the Quiet Quitting Reason and Behavior Scale (QQRBS). First, the conceptual structure of the scale was determined. In the second stage, the scale was structured. Structuring the scale is deciding on the scale type and scaling technique. The third stage is the first application of the scale. After the scale was applied, factor analysis, internal consistency assessment and validity studies were carried out in the item analysis section, which is the fourth stage. The fifth stage is the second application stage of the scale and at this stage, the scale was reviewed by test-retest and an application guideline was prepared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha value of draft items is 0.87, quiet quitting behavior sub-dimension Cronbach's Alpha value is 0.76 and reasons for quiet quitting Cronbach's Alpha value is 0.820. It was decided to keep the remaining 35 items after EFA analysis because the corrected correlation numbers of the items were >0.30. This study explains the design and development process of the QQRBS in Turkish society.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to this developed scale, as the scale mean score of the total and sub-dimensions increases, the tendency to quiet quitting increases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:安静地放弃"(Quiet Quitting)这一概念在文献中可能被认为是一个新概念,它被用来描述一种被动和沉默的放弃:本研究的目的是编制一个量表,以评估 "默默放弃 "的原因和后果:方法:在编制安静戒烟原因和行为量表(QQRBS)的过程中,采用了 Cohen 和 Swerdik 提出的五阶段量表编制法。首先,确定量表的概念结构。在第二阶段,对量表进行结构化。量表结构化就是决定量表类型和标度技术。第三阶段是首次应用量表。量表应用后,在项目分析部分进行因子分析、内部一致性评估和效度研究,这是第四阶段。第五阶段是量表的第二次应用阶段,在这一阶段,对量表进行了重测复核,并编制了应用指南:草案项目的 Cronbach's Alpha 值为 0.87,静默戒烟行为子维度的 Cronbach's Alpha 值为 0.76,静默戒烟原因的 Cronbach's Alpha 值为 0.820。本研究解释了土耳其社会 QQRBS 的设计和开发过程:根据所开发的量表,随着总分和分维度的量表平均分的增加,安静戒烟的倾向也会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quiet Quitting reason and behavior scale design and development process.

Background: The concept of "Quiet Quitting", which might be considered new in the literature, is used to describe a passive and silent giving up.

Objective: The aim of this study is to develop a scale to evaluate both the causes and consequences of "quiet quitting" which is believed to be increasing for various reasons in our country as well as in the world.

Method: Five-stage scale development method which was presented by Cohen and Swerdik was used in the process of developing the Quiet Quitting Reason and Behavior Scale (QQRBS). First, the conceptual structure of the scale was determined. In the second stage, the scale was structured. Structuring the scale is deciding on the scale type and scaling technique. The third stage is the first application of the scale. After the scale was applied, factor analysis, internal consistency assessment and validity studies were carried out in the item analysis section, which is the fourth stage. The fifth stage is the second application stage of the scale and at this stage, the scale was reviewed by test-retest and an application guideline was prepared.

Results: Cronbach's alpha value of draft items is 0.87, quiet quitting behavior sub-dimension Cronbach's Alpha value is 0.76 and reasons for quiet quitting Cronbach's Alpha value is 0.820. It was decided to keep the remaining 35 items after EFA analysis because the corrected correlation numbers of the items were >0.30. This study explains the design and development process of the QQRBS in Turkish society.

Conclusion: According to this developed scale, as the scale mean score of the total and sub-dimensions increases, the tendency to quiet quitting increases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信