肋下 VATS 与传统单门侧向 VATS 方法的临床经验比较。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.4103/jmas.jmas_26_24
Volkan Kösek, Eyad Al Masri, Katina Nikolova, Björn Ellger, Shadi Wais, Bassam Redwan
{"title":"肋下 VATS 与传统单门侧向 VATS 方法的临床经验比较。","authors":"Volkan Kösek, Eyad Al Masri, Katina Nikolova, Björn Ellger, Shadi Wais, Bassam Redwan","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_26_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present study reports the first clinical experience with subcostal uniportal VATS (suVATS) compared with the conventional lateral uniportal VATS (luVATS) approach.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All patients who underwent suVATS between January 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients who had undergone luVATS for similar indications were included as the control group. The data were prospectively and retrospectively analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The suVATS group included 38 patients with a mean age of 61 (30-83) years. The luVATS group included 33 patients (mean age, 69 years; range: 46-89 years). An intercostal block was performed intraoperatively in the luVATS group. Local infiltration under anaesthesia was performed around the incision in the suVATS group. The duration of the surgery was significantly longer in the suVATS group. However, the chest tube treatment and hospital stay duration were significantly shorter in the suVATS group. The routinely recorded Visual Analogue Scale scores on the first post-operative day and the day of discharge were significantly lower in the suVATS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subcostal uniportal VATS enables a shorter drainage treatment duration and hospital stay and significantly reduces post-operative pain. Thus, a faster patient recovery can be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":"20 3","pages":"326-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11354960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative clinical experience of subcostal VATS versus conventional uniportal lateral VATS approach.\",\"authors\":\"Volkan Kösek, Eyad Al Masri, Katina Nikolova, Björn Ellger, Shadi Wais, Bassam Redwan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmas.jmas_26_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present study reports the first clinical experience with subcostal uniportal VATS (suVATS) compared with the conventional lateral uniportal VATS (luVATS) approach.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All patients who underwent suVATS between January 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients who had undergone luVATS for similar indications were included as the control group. The data were prospectively and retrospectively analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The suVATS group included 38 patients with a mean age of 61 (30-83) years. The luVATS group included 33 patients (mean age, 69 years; range: 46-89 years). An intercostal block was performed intraoperatively in the luVATS group. Local infiltration under anaesthesia was performed around the incision in the suVATS group. The duration of the surgery was significantly longer in the suVATS group. However, the chest tube treatment and hospital stay duration were significantly shorter in the suVATS group. The routinely recorded Visual Analogue Scale scores on the first post-operative day and the day of discharge were significantly lower in the suVATS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subcostal uniportal VATS enables a shorter drainage treatment duration and hospital stay and significantly reduces post-operative pain. Thus, a faster patient recovery can be achieved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"326-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11354960/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_26_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_26_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究报告了肋骨下单孔VATS(suVATS)与传统的侧单孔VATS(luVATS)方法的首次临床经验对比:纳入2019年1月至2020年4月期间接受suVATS的所有患者。因类似适应症接受过 luVATS 的患者作为对照组。对数据进行了前瞻性和回顾性分析:suVATS组包括38名患者,平均年龄为61(30-83)岁。LuVATS组包括33名患者(平均年龄69岁;范围:46-89岁)。luVATS 组在术中进行了肋间阻滞。suVATS组则在切口周围进行局部浸润麻醉。suVATS 组的手术时间明显更长。但 suVATS 组的胸管治疗和住院时间明显较短。术后第一天和出院当天常规记录的视觉模拟量表评分在 suVATS 组明显较低:结论:肋下单孔 VATS 可缩短引流治疗时间和住院时间,并明显减轻术后疼痛。结论:肋下单孔 VATS 可缩短引流治疗时间和住院时间,并明显减轻术后疼痛,从而加快患者康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative clinical experience of subcostal VATS versus conventional uniportal lateral VATS approach.

Introduction: The present study reports the first clinical experience with subcostal uniportal VATS (suVATS) compared with the conventional lateral uniportal VATS (luVATS) approach.

Patients and methods: All patients who underwent suVATS between January 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients who had undergone luVATS for similar indications were included as the control group. The data were prospectively and retrospectively analysed.

Results: The suVATS group included 38 patients with a mean age of 61 (30-83) years. The luVATS group included 33 patients (mean age, 69 years; range: 46-89 years). An intercostal block was performed intraoperatively in the luVATS group. Local infiltration under anaesthesia was performed around the incision in the suVATS group. The duration of the surgery was significantly longer in the suVATS group. However, the chest tube treatment and hospital stay duration were significantly shorter in the suVATS group. The routinely recorded Visual Analogue Scale scores on the first post-operative day and the day of discharge were significantly lower in the suVATS group.

Conclusion: Subcostal uniportal VATS enables a shorter drainage treatment duration and hospital stay and significantly reduces post-operative pain. Thus, a faster patient recovery can be achieved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信