循环死亡后捐献肾移植中,捐献者热缺血时间对移植物存活率的影响。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Ritah R Chumdermpadetsuk, Donna Marie L Alvino, Sumedh Kaul, Aaron Fleishman, Devin E Eckhoff, Martha Pavlakis, David D Lee
{"title":"循环死亡后捐献肾移植中,捐献者热缺血时间对移植物存活率的影响。","authors":"Ritah R Chumdermpadetsuk, Donna Marie L Alvino, Sumedh Kaul, Aaron Fleishman, Devin E Eckhoff, Martha Pavlakis, David D Lee","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utilization of kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) is an important strategy to address the ongoing shortage of organs suitable for transplantation in the United States. However, the nonuse rate of DCD kidneys remains high compared with kidneys donated after brain death (DBD) because of concerns regarding the injury incurred during donor warm ischemia time (DWIT). Therefore, we investigated the impact of DWIT on the risk of death-censored graft failure after DCD kidney transplantation (KT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was conducted on DCD KTs using the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data set. The association of DWIT with death-censored graft failure was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, with reference to DCD KTs with Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) of ≤0.78 and the median DWIT of 26 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 032 DCD kidney-alone transplants between January 2010 and December 2021 were studied. When stratified by KDRI, increasing DWIT was associated with a clinically significant increased risk for death-censored graft failure only in the subset of kidneys with KDRI >1.14 but not in those with KDRI >0.78-≤0.94 and >0.94-≤1.14, compared with the reference group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We suggest that clinicians should not decline kidneys on the basis of DWIT in favor of potential offers of DBD or other DCD kidneys with shorter DWIT, provided that their KDRI scores are within an acceptable limit. Our study highlights opportunities for more efficient usage of DCD kidneys and improving the shortage of transplantable organs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Donor Warm Ischemia Time on Graft Survival for Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Ritah R Chumdermpadetsuk, Donna Marie L Alvino, Sumedh Kaul, Aaron Fleishman, Devin E Eckhoff, Martha Pavlakis, David D Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TP.0000000000005155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utilization of kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) is an important strategy to address the ongoing shortage of organs suitable for transplantation in the United States. However, the nonuse rate of DCD kidneys remains high compared with kidneys donated after brain death (DBD) because of concerns regarding the injury incurred during donor warm ischemia time (DWIT). Therefore, we investigated the impact of DWIT on the risk of death-censored graft failure after DCD kidney transplantation (KT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was conducted on DCD KTs using the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data set. The association of DWIT with death-censored graft failure was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, with reference to DCD KTs with Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) of ≤0.78 and the median DWIT of 26 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 032 DCD kidney-alone transplants between January 2010 and December 2021 were studied. When stratified by KDRI, increasing DWIT was associated with a clinically significant increased risk for death-censored graft failure only in the subset of kidneys with KDRI >1.14 but not in those with KDRI >0.78-≤0.94 and >0.94-≤1.14, compared with the reference group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We suggest that clinicians should not decline kidneys on the basis of DWIT in favor of potential offers of DBD or other DCD kidneys with shorter DWIT, provided that their KDRI scores are within an acceptable limit. Our study highlights opportunities for more efficient usage of DCD kidneys and improving the shortage of transplantable organs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005155\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,利用循环死亡(DCD)后捐献的肾脏是解决适合移植的器官持续短缺问题的一项重要策略。然而,与脑死亡(DBD)后捐献的肾脏相比,DCD肾脏的未使用率仍然很高,这是因为人们担心在捐献者温暖缺血时间(DWIT)期间会造成损伤。因此,我们研究了 DWIT 对 DCD 肾移植(KT)后死亡校验移植物失败风险的影响:方法:我们使用标准移植分析和研究数据集对 DCD 肾移植进行了回顾性分析。方法:使用标准移植分析研究数据集对DCD KT进行回顾性分析,并参考肾脏捐献者风险指数(KDRI)≤0.78且DWIT中位数为26分钟的DCD KT,使用多变量Cox比例危险回归评估DWIT与死亡剪切移植物失败的关系:共研究了2010年1月至2021年12月期间的28 032例DCD单肾移植。与参照组相比,当按KDRI分层时,只有在KDRI>1.14的肾脏亚组中,DWIT的增加与临床上显著增加的死亡剪除移植失败风险相关,而在KDRI>0.78-≤0.94和>0.94-≤1.14的肾脏亚组中,DWIT的增加与临床上显著增加的死亡剪除移植失败风险无关:我们建议临床医生不要根据DWIT拒绝提供肾脏,而应选择DBD或其他DCD肾脏,只要它们的KDRI评分在可接受的范围内。我们的研究强调了更有效地利用 DCD 肾脏和改善可移植器官短缺的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Donor Warm Ischemia Time on Graft Survival for Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplantation.

Background: The utilization of kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) is an important strategy to address the ongoing shortage of organs suitable for transplantation in the United States. However, the nonuse rate of DCD kidneys remains high compared with kidneys donated after brain death (DBD) because of concerns regarding the injury incurred during donor warm ischemia time (DWIT). Therefore, we investigated the impact of DWIT on the risk of death-censored graft failure after DCD kidney transplantation (KT).

Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on DCD KTs using the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data set. The association of DWIT with death-censored graft failure was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, with reference to DCD KTs with Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) of ≤0.78 and the median DWIT of 26 min.

Results: A total of 28 032 DCD kidney-alone transplants between January 2010 and December 2021 were studied. When stratified by KDRI, increasing DWIT was associated with a clinically significant increased risk for death-censored graft failure only in the subset of kidneys with KDRI >1.14 but not in those with KDRI >0.78-≤0.94 and >0.94-≤1.14, compared with the reference group.

Conclusions: We suggest that clinicians should not decline kidneys on the basis of DWIT in favor of potential offers of DBD or other DCD kidneys with shorter DWIT, provided that their KDRI scores are within an acceptable limit. Our study highlights opportunities for more efficient usage of DCD kidneys and improving the shortage of transplantable organs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信