拥抱解释深度的幻觉:在医疗保健教育中使用迭代提示整合大型语言模型的战略框架。

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2382863
Seysha Mehta, Neil Mehta
{"title":"拥抱解释深度的幻觉:在医疗保健教育中使用迭代提示整合大型语言模型的战略框架。","authors":"Seysha Mehta, Neil Mehta","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2382863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare educators are exploring ways to integrate Large Language Models (LLMs) into the curriculum. At the same time, they are concerned about the negative impact on students' cognitive development. There is concern that the students will not learn to think and problem-solve by themselves and instead become dependent on LLMs to find answers. In addition, the students could start accepting the LLM generated responses at face value. The Illusion of Explanatory Depth (IoED) is a cognitive bias where humans believe they understand complex phenomena in more depth than they do. This illusion is caused when people rely on external sources of information rather than deeper levels of internalized knowledge. This illusion can be exposed by asking follow-up in depth questions. Using the same approach, specifically iterative prompting, can help students interact with LLM's while learning actively, gaining deeper levels of knowledge, and exposing the LLM shortcomings. The article proposes that educators encourage use of LLMs to complete assignments using a template, that promotes students' reflections on their interactions with LLMs, using iterative prompting. This process based on IoED, and iterative prompting will help educators integrate LLMs in the curriculum while mitigating the risk of students becoming dependent on these tools. Students will practice active learning and experience firsthand the inaccuracies and inconsistencies in LLM responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"208-211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embracing the illusion of explanatory depth: A strategic framework for using iterative prompting for integrating large language models in healthcare education.\",\"authors\":\"Seysha Mehta, Neil Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2382863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare educators are exploring ways to integrate Large Language Models (LLMs) into the curriculum. At the same time, they are concerned about the negative impact on students' cognitive development. There is concern that the students will not learn to think and problem-solve by themselves and instead become dependent on LLMs to find answers. In addition, the students could start accepting the LLM generated responses at face value. The Illusion of Explanatory Depth (IoED) is a cognitive bias where humans believe they understand complex phenomena in more depth than they do. This illusion is caused when people rely on external sources of information rather than deeper levels of internalized knowledge. This illusion can be exposed by asking follow-up in depth questions. Using the same approach, specifically iterative prompting, can help students interact with LLM's while learning actively, gaining deeper levels of knowledge, and exposing the LLM shortcomings. The article proposes that educators encourage use of LLMs to complete assignments using a template, that promotes students' reflections on their interactions with LLMs, using iterative prompting. This process based on IoED, and iterative prompting will help educators integrate LLMs in the curriculum while mitigating the risk of students becoming dependent on these tools. Students will practice active learning and experience firsthand the inaccuracies and inconsistencies in LLM responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"208-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2382863\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2382863","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健教育工作者正在探索将大语言模型(LLM)纳入课程的方法。与此同时,他们也担心这会对学生的认知发展产生负面影响。他们担心学生不会学会自己思考和解决问题,而是依赖 LLM 来寻找答案。此外,学生可能会开始接受法律硕士从表面上得出的答案。解释深度错觉(IoED)是一种认知偏差,即人类认为自己对复杂现象的理解比实际理解更深入。当人们依赖外部信息来源而不是更深层次的内化知识时,就会产生这种错觉。这种错觉可以通过提出深入的后续问题来揭示。使用同样的方法,特别是迭代提示法,可以帮助学生与 LLM 互动,同时积极学习,获得更深层次的知识,并暴露 LLM 的缺陷。文章建议,教育工作者鼓励学生使用语文学习工具完成作业,使用迭代提示的模板,促进学生反思他们与语文学习工具的互动。这一基于 IoED 和迭代提示的过程将有助于教育工作者将 LLM 纳入课程,同时降低学生依赖这些工具的风险。学生将练习主动学习,并亲身体验 LLM 回答中的不准确和不一致之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Embracing the illusion of explanatory depth: A strategic framework for using iterative prompting for integrating large language models in healthcare education.

Healthcare educators are exploring ways to integrate Large Language Models (LLMs) into the curriculum. At the same time, they are concerned about the negative impact on students' cognitive development. There is concern that the students will not learn to think and problem-solve by themselves and instead become dependent on LLMs to find answers. In addition, the students could start accepting the LLM generated responses at face value. The Illusion of Explanatory Depth (IoED) is a cognitive bias where humans believe they understand complex phenomena in more depth than they do. This illusion is caused when people rely on external sources of information rather than deeper levels of internalized knowledge. This illusion can be exposed by asking follow-up in depth questions. Using the same approach, specifically iterative prompting, can help students interact with LLM's while learning actively, gaining deeper levels of knowledge, and exposing the LLM shortcomings. The article proposes that educators encourage use of LLMs to complete assignments using a template, that promotes students' reflections on their interactions with LLMs, using iterative prompting. This process based on IoED, and iterative prompting will help educators integrate LLMs in the curriculum while mitigating the risk of students becoming dependent on these tools. Students will practice active learning and experience firsthand the inaccuracies and inconsistencies in LLM responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信