开发并验证用于初级医疗诊断前列腺癌的预测评分。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Francesco Lapi, Ettore Marconi, Iacopo Cricelli, Alberto Sobrero, Andrea Salvetti, Salvatore Campo, Claudio Cricelli
{"title":"开发并验证用于初级医疗诊断前列腺癌的预测评分。","authors":"Francesco Lapi, Ettore Marconi, Iacopo Cricelli, Alberto Sobrero, Andrea Salvetti, Salvatore Campo, Claudio Cricelli","doi":"10.1111/jep.14111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) represents the fifth cause of death in the male population worldwide. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test demonstrated poor accuracy to assess the presence of PCa. Thus, the PSA testing paradigm should be moved from the systematic screening approach to the early identification of men who are harbouring clinically significant disease. Accurate clinical-based tools to predict PCa should therefore be developed for general practice. We derived and validated a PCa predictive score using a primary care data source.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Italian Health Search Database, we formed a cohort of men aged 45-90 years in the period between 2002 and 2015. These patients were followed up until 31 December 2022. Those with less than a 5-year follow-up were excluded. The cohort was randomly divided into 'derivation' and 'validation' samples in a 1:1 ratio. Along with the demographic and clinical determinants forming the score, we investigated the role of PSA kinetics in the prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 529,082 men aged 45+ years, we identified 14,524 cases of PCa (incidence rate = 2.71 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval = 2.67-2.80). The prediction accuracy of the PCa-HScore featured an explained variation of 12% and a discrimination power of 70%. The calibration slope was almost equal to 1 (p = 0.951, tested for equivalence against the 'perfect' slope) and the PSA kinetics did not improve the prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PCa-HScore might guide the prescription of PSA and/or other clinical strategies in those men reporting certain levels of risk. A related decision support system could therefore be implemented in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a predictive score for diagnosing prostate cancer in primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Lapi, Ettore Marconi, Iacopo Cricelli, Alberto Sobrero, Andrea Salvetti, Salvatore Campo, Claudio Cricelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) represents the fifth cause of death in the male population worldwide. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test demonstrated poor accuracy to assess the presence of PCa. Thus, the PSA testing paradigm should be moved from the systematic screening approach to the early identification of men who are harbouring clinically significant disease. Accurate clinical-based tools to predict PCa should therefore be developed for general practice. We derived and validated a PCa predictive score using a primary care data source.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Italian Health Search Database, we formed a cohort of men aged 45-90 years in the period between 2002 and 2015. These patients were followed up until 31 December 2022. Those with less than a 5-year follow-up were excluded. The cohort was randomly divided into 'derivation' and 'validation' samples in a 1:1 ratio. Along with the demographic and clinical determinants forming the score, we investigated the role of PSA kinetics in the prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 529,082 men aged 45+ years, we identified 14,524 cases of PCa (incidence rate = 2.71 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval = 2.67-2.80). The prediction accuracy of the PCa-HScore featured an explained variation of 12% and a discrimination power of 70%. The calibration slope was almost equal to 1 (p = 0.951, tested for equivalence against the 'perfect' slope) and the PSA kinetics did not improve the prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PCa-HScore might guide the prescription of PSA and/or other clinical strategies in those men reporting certain levels of risk. A related decision support system could therefore be implemented in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前列腺癌(PCa)是全球男性的第五大死因。前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测在评估是否存在前列腺癌方面的准确性很低。因此,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测模式应从系统性筛查方法转向早期识别患有临床重大疾病的男性。因此,应为全科医生开发基于临床的准确 PCa 预测工具。我们利用初级保健数据源得出并验证了 PCa 预测评分:我们利用意大利健康搜索数据库,对 2002 年至 2015 年期间年龄在 45-90 岁之间的男性建立了一个队列。我们对这些患者进行了随访,直至 2022 年 12 月 31 日。随访时间不足 5 年的患者被排除在外。队列按 1:1 的比例随机分为 "衍生 "和 "验证 "样本。除了构成评分的人口统计学和临床决定因素外,我们还研究了 PSA 动力学在预测准确性中的作用:在一组 529082 名 45 岁以上的男性样本中,我们发现了 14524 例 PCa(发病率 = 每 1000 人年 2.71 例;95% 置信区间 = 2.67-2.80)。PCa-HScore 的预测准确率为 12%,区分度为 70%。校准斜率几乎等于1(P = 0.951,与 "完美 "斜率的等效性测试),PSA动力学并未提高预测准确性:PCa-HScore可以指导那些报告有一定风险的男性使用PSA和/或其他临床策略。因此,相关的决策支持系统可在初级保健中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a predictive score for diagnosing prostate cancer in primary care.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) represents the fifth cause of death in the male population worldwide. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test demonstrated poor accuracy to assess the presence of PCa. Thus, the PSA testing paradigm should be moved from the systematic screening approach to the early identification of men who are harbouring clinically significant disease. Accurate clinical-based tools to predict PCa should therefore be developed for general practice. We derived and validated a PCa predictive score using a primary care data source.

Methods: Using the Italian Health Search Database, we formed a cohort of men aged 45-90 years in the period between 2002 and 2015. These patients were followed up until 31 December 2022. Those with less than a 5-year follow-up were excluded. The cohort was randomly divided into 'derivation' and 'validation' samples in a 1:1 ratio. Along with the demographic and clinical determinants forming the score, we investigated the role of PSA kinetics in the prediction accuracy.

Results: In a cohort of 529,082 men aged 45+ years, we identified 14,524 cases of PCa (incidence rate = 2.71 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval = 2.67-2.80). The prediction accuracy of the PCa-HScore featured an explained variation of 12% and a discrimination power of 70%. The calibration slope was almost equal to 1 (p = 0.951, tested for equivalence against the 'perfect' slope) and the PSA kinetics did not improve the prediction accuracy.

Conclusions: The PCa-HScore might guide the prescription of PSA and/or other clinical strategies in those men reporting certain levels of risk. A related decision support system could therefore be implemented in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信