衡量常用物理治疗设备的标准和新型消毒方法的效果:一项分两个阶段进行的前瞻性随机对照试验。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Bobby G Warren, Aaron Barrett, Amanda Graves, Guerbine Fils-Aime, Jennifer Edelschick, Jolinda Cullinan, Diandrea McCottter, Nicholas A Turner, Deverick J Anderson
{"title":"衡量常用物理治疗设备的标准和新型消毒方法的效果:一项分两个阶段进行的前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Bobby G Warren, Aaron Barrett, Amanda Graves, Guerbine Fils-Aime, Jennifer Edelschick, Jolinda Cullinan, Diandrea McCottter, Nicholas A Turner, Deverick J Anderson","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frequently used physical therapy (PT) equipment is difficult to disinfect due to equipment material and shape. The efficacy of standard disinfection of PT equipment is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a 2-phase prospective microbiological analysis of fomites used in PT at our hospital from September 2022 to October 2023. For both phases, study fomites were obtained after usage and split into symmetrical halves for sampling. In phase 1, sides were sampled following standard disinfection. In phase 2, sides were randomized 1:1 to intervention or control. Samples were obtained before and after the intervention, a disinfection cabinet using Ultraviolet C (UV-C) and 6% nebulized hydrogen peroxide. We defined antimicrobial-resistant clinically important pathogens (AMR CIP) as methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Multidrug resistant (MDR)-Gram-negatives and non-AMR CIP as methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Vancomycin sensitive Enterococcus (VSE), and Gram-negatives. Three assessments were made: 1) contamination following standard disinfection (phase 1), 2) contamination postintervention compared to no disinfection (phase 2) and, 3) contamination following standard disinfection compared to postintervention (phase 1 vs phase 2 intervention).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median total colony-forming units (CFU) from 122 study fomite samples was 1,348 (IQR 398-2,365). At the sample level, 52(43%) and 15(12%) of samples harbored any clinically important pathogens (CIPs) or AMR CIPs, respectively. The median CFU was 0 (IQR 0-55) in the intervention group and 977 (409-2,547) in the control group (<i>P</i> < .00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following standard disinfection, PT equipment remained heavily contaminated including AMR and non-AMR CIPs. Following the intervention, PT equipment was less contaminated and harbored no AMR CIPs compared to control sides supporting the efficacy of the intervention on difficult-to-disinfect PT fomites.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the efficacy of standard and novel disinfection methods on frequently used physical therapy equipment: a 2-phase prospective randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Bobby G Warren, Aaron Barrett, Amanda Graves, Guerbine Fils-Aime, Jennifer Edelschick, Jolinda Cullinan, Diandrea McCottter, Nicholas A Turner, Deverick J Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2024.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frequently used physical therapy (PT) equipment is difficult to disinfect due to equipment material and shape. The efficacy of standard disinfection of PT equipment is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a 2-phase prospective microbiological analysis of fomites used in PT at our hospital from September 2022 to October 2023. For both phases, study fomites were obtained after usage and split into symmetrical halves for sampling. In phase 1, sides were sampled following standard disinfection. In phase 2, sides were randomized 1:1 to intervention or control. Samples were obtained before and after the intervention, a disinfection cabinet using Ultraviolet C (UV-C) and 6% nebulized hydrogen peroxide. We defined antimicrobial-resistant clinically important pathogens (AMR CIP) as methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Multidrug resistant (MDR)-Gram-negatives and non-AMR CIP as methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Vancomycin sensitive Enterococcus (VSE), and Gram-negatives. Three assessments were made: 1) contamination following standard disinfection (phase 1), 2) contamination postintervention compared to no disinfection (phase 2) and, 3) contamination following standard disinfection compared to postintervention (phase 1 vs phase 2 intervention).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median total colony-forming units (CFU) from 122 study fomite samples was 1,348 (IQR 398-2,365). At the sample level, 52(43%) and 15(12%) of samples harbored any clinically important pathogens (CIPs) or AMR CIPs, respectively. The median CFU was 0 (IQR 0-55) in the intervention group and 977 (409-2,547) in the control group (<i>P</i> < .00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following standard disinfection, PT equipment remained heavily contaminated including AMR and non-AMR CIPs. Following the intervention, PT equipment was less contaminated and harbored no AMR CIPs compared to control sides supporting the efficacy of the intervention on difficult-to-disinfect PT fomites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于设备材料和形状的原因,常用的物理治疗(PT)设备很难消毒。人们对物理治疗设备的标准消毒效果知之甚少:方法:我们从 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 10 月对本医院用于 PT 的熏蒸器进行了两阶段前瞻性微生物分析。在这两个阶段中,研究用的酵母都是在使用后获得的,并分成对称的两半进行采样。在第 1 阶段,对两侧进行标准消毒后取样。在第 2 阶段,按 1:1 随机分配干预或对照组。在使用紫外线 C(UV-C)和 6% 雾化过氧化氢的消毒柜进行干预之前和之后采集样本。我们将耐抗菌素临床重要病原体(AMR CIP)定义为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)和耐多药(MDR)革兰氏阴性菌,将非 AMR CIP 定义为对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)、对万古霉素敏感的肠球菌(VSE)和革兰氏阴性菌。进行了三项评估1) 标准消毒后的污染情况(第 1 阶段);2) 干预后与未消毒相比的污染情况(第 2 阶段);3) 标准消毒后与干预后相比的污染情况(第 1 阶段与第 2 阶段干预):122 份研究酵母样本的菌落形成单位(CFU)总数中位数为 1 348(IQR 398-2 365)。在样本水平上,分别有 52 个(43%)和 15 个(12%)样本含有任何临床重要病原体 (CIP) 或 AMR CIP。干预组的 CFU 中位数为 0(IQR 0-55),对照组为 977(409-2,547)(P < .00001):结论:经过标准消毒后,PT 设备仍然受到严重污染,包括 AMR 和非 AMR CIP。采取干预措施后,与对照组相比,PT 设备的污染程度降低,并且没有携带 AMR CIP,这证明了干预措施对难以消毒的 PT 感染场所的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the efficacy of standard and novel disinfection methods on frequently used physical therapy equipment: a 2-phase prospective randomized controlled trial.

Background: Frequently used physical therapy (PT) equipment is difficult to disinfect due to equipment material and shape. The efficacy of standard disinfection of PT equipment is poorly understood.

Methods: We completed a 2-phase prospective microbiological analysis of fomites used in PT at our hospital from September 2022 to October 2023. For both phases, study fomites were obtained after usage and split into symmetrical halves for sampling. In phase 1, sides were sampled following standard disinfection. In phase 2, sides were randomized 1:1 to intervention or control. Samples were obtained before and after the intervention, a disinfection cabinet using Ultraviolet C (UV-C) and 6% nebulized hydrogen peroxide. We defined antimicrobial-resistant clinically important pathogens (AMR CIP) as methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Multidrug resistant (MDR)-Gram-negatives and non-AMR CIP as methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Vancomycin sensitive Enterococcus (VSE), and Gram-negatives. Three assessments were made: 1) contamination following standard disinfection (phase 1), 2) contamination postintervention compared to no disinfection (phase 2) and, 3) contamination following standard disinfection compared to postintervention (phase 1 vs phase 2 intervention).

Results: The median total colony-forming units (CFU) from 122 study fomite samples was 1,348 (IQR 398-2,365). At the sample level, 52(43%) and 15(12%) of samples harbored any clinically important pathogens (CIPs) or AMR CIPs, respectively. The median CFU was 0 (IQR 0-55) in the intervention group and 977 (409-2,547) in the control group (P < .00001).

Conclusion: Following standard disinfection, PT equipment remained heavily contaminated including AMR and non-AMR CIPs. Following the intervention, PT equipment was less contaminated and harbored no AMR CIPs compared to control sides supporting the efficacy of the intervention on difficult-to-disinfect PT fomites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信