化疗患者运动肿瘤学研究中认知功能的测量:范围综述》。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Crisann Moon, Rebekah L Wilson, Paola Gonzalo-Encabo, Dong-Woo Kang, Sara Mithani, Christina M Dieli-Conwright, Darpan I Patel
{"title":"化疗患者运动肿瘤学研究中认知功能的测量:范围综述》。","authors":"Crisann Moon, Rebekah L Wilson, Paola Gonzalo-Encabo, Dong-Woo Kang, Sara Mithani, Christina M Dieli-Conwright, Darpan I Patel","doi":"10.1177/15347354241265349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer-associated cognitive deficits following chemotherapy have received increased attention in clinical research. Exercise has been shown to preserve cognitive function in cancer patients, though the overall effect is mixed. Here we present a scoping review of the published literature summarizing methods used to assess cognitive function in exercise oncology trials. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases were searched using keywords \"cognition,\" \"cancer\" OR \"neoplasm\" OR \"tumor,\" \"chemotherapy\" and \"exercise\" OR \"physical activity.\" Studies eligible for inclusion include prospective studies that were published in English in peer-reviewed journals that include a method of assessing cognitive function in adult cancer patients, in which an exercise modality or method of quantifying exercise habits was evident. Studies were excluded if they included a pediatric population, patients that were not diagnosed with cancer, or were systematic/narrative/scoping reviews, protocol papers or dissertation/theses. <b>Results:</b> A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 29 unique assessments were used to evaluate cognitive function, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs; n = 8) and objective (n = 21) methods. More than half (n = 17) of included studies relied on PROs while 12 studies utilized objective measures of cognitive function Cognitive domains of the PROs were limited in scope, focusing on memory and attention/concentration while the objective measures were broader and inclusive of multiple domains. <b>Conclusion:</b> The results of this review indicate that mixed approaches to evaluating cognitive function in cancer patients pose a major limitation to understanding the role of exercise as an integrative approach. The evidence demonstrates a need for more uniform assessment of cognitive function in exercise oncology trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":13734,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","volume":"23 ","pages":"15347354241265349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Cognitive Function in Exercise Oncology Studies in Patients Treated With Chemotherapy: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Crisann Moon, Rebekah L Wilson, Paola Gonzalo-Encabo, Dong-Woo Kang, Sara Mithani, Christina M Dieli-Conwright, Darpan I Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347354241265349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cancer-associated cognitive deficits following chemotherapy have received increased attention in clinical research. Exercise has been shown to preserve cognitive function in cancer patients, though the overall effect is mixed. Here we present a scoping review of the published literature summarizing methods used to assess cognitive function in exercise oncology trials. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases were searched using keywords \\\"cognition,\\\" \\\"cancer\\\" OR \\\"neoplasm\\\" OR \\\"tumor,\\\" \\\"chemotherapy\\\" and \\\"exercise\\\" OR \\\"physical activity.\\\" Studies eligible for inclusion include prospective studies that were published in English in peer-reviewed journals that include a method of assessing cognitive function in adult cancer patients, in which an exercise modality or method of quantifying exercise habits was evident. Studies were excluded if they included a pediatric population, patients that were not diagnosed with cancer, or were systematic/narrative/scoping reviews, protocol papers or dissertation/theses. <b>Results:</b> A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 29 unique assessments were used to evaluate cognitive function, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs; n = 8) and objective (n = 21) methods. More than half (n = 17) of included studies relied on PROs while 12 studies utilized objective measures of cognitive function Cognitive domains of the PROs were limited in scope, focusing on memory and attention/concentration while the objective measures were broader and inclusive of multiple domains. <b>Conclusion:</b> The results of this review indicate that mixed approaches to evaluating cognitive function in cancer patients pose a major limitation to understanding the role of exercise as an integrative approach. The evidence demonstrates a need for more uniform assessment of cognitive function in exercise oncology trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Cancer Therapies\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"15347354241265349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271141/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Cancer Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241265349\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241265349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化疗后与癌症相关的认知障碍越来越受到临床研究的关注。有研究表明,运动可以保护癌症患者的认知功能,但总体效果不一。在此,我们对已发表的文献进行了综述,总结了用于评估运动疗法肿瘤学试验认知功能的方法。方法:使用关键词 "认知"、"癌症 "或 "肿瘤 "或 "肿瘤"、"化疗 "和 "运动 "或 "体育锻炼 "检索 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 数据库。符合纳入条件的研究包括在同行评审期刊上以英文发表的前瞻性研究,这些研究包括评估成年癌症患者认知功能的方法,其中运动方式或量化运动习惯的方法非常明显。如果研究涉及儿科人群、未确诊癌症的患者,或者是系统性/叙事性/范围性综述、协议论文或学位论文/论文,则排除在外。结果:共有 29 项研究符合纳入标准。共有 29 项独特的评估方法被用于评估认知功能,包括患者报告结果 (PROs; n = 8) 和客观方法 (n = 21)。半数以上(n = 17)的纳入研究依赖于患者报告结果,而 12 项研究则采用了认知功能的客观测量方法。患者报告结果的认知领域范围有限,主要集中在记忆力和注意力/集中力方面,而客观测量方法则范围更广,包含多个领域。结论本综述的结果表明,评估癌症患者认知功能的方法多种多样,这严重限制了人们对运动作为一种综合方法的作用的理解。这些证据表明,在肿瘤运动试验中需要对认知功能进行更加统一的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement of Cognitive Function in Exercise Oncology Studies in Patients Treated With Chemotherapy: A Scoping Review.

Cancer-associated cognitive deficits following chemotherapy have received increased attention in clinical research. Exercise has been shown to preserve cognitive function in cancer patients, though the overall effect is mixed. Here we present a scoping review of the published literature summarizing methods used to assess cognitive function in exercise oncology trials. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases were searched using keywords "cognition," "cancer" OR "neoplasm" OR "tumor," "chemotherapy" and "exercise" OR "physical activity." Studies eligible for inclusion include prospective studies that were published in English in peer-reviewed journals that include a method of assessing cognitive function in adult cancer patients, in which an exercise modality or method of quantifying exercise habits was evident. Studies were excluded if they included a pediatric population, patients that were not diagnosed with cancer, or were systematic/narrative/scoping reviews, protocol papers or dissertation/theses. Results: A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 29 unique assessments were used to evaluate cognitive function, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs; n = 8) and objective (n = 21) methods. More than half (n = 17) of included studies relied on PROs while 12 studies utilized objective measures of cognitive function Cognitive domains of the PROs were limited in scope, focusing on memory and attention/concentration while the objective measures were broader and inclusive of multiple domains. Conclusion: The results of this review indicate that mixed approaches to evaluating cognitive function in cancer patients pose a major limitation to understanding the role of exercise as an integrative approach. The evidence demonstrates a need for more uniform assessment of cognitive function in exercise oncology trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Integrative Cancer Therapies 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ICT is the first journal to spearhead and focus on a new and growing movement in cancer treatment. The journal emphasizes scientific understanding of alternative medicine and traditional medicine therapies, and their responsible integration with conventional health care. Integrative care includes therapeutic interventions in diet, lifestyle, exercise, stress care, and nutritional supplements, as well as experimental vaccines, chrono-chemotherapy, and other advanced treatments. Contributors are leading oncologists, researchers, nurses, and health-care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信