子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛患者服用三杰止痛胶囊的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、3:1 随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s11655-024-3756-y
Jin-Hua Leng, Hua Duan, Zheng Guan, Ying-Fang Zhou, Hong Qu, Kai-Hong Xu, Shao-Fen Zhang, Qin Zhang, Xin Wang, Kai-Qing Lin, Jing-He Lang
{"title":"子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛患者服用三杰止痛胶囊的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、3:1 随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Jin-Hua Leng, Hua Duan, Zheng Guan, Ying-Fang Zhou, Hong Qu, Kai-Hong Xu, Shao-Fen Zhang, Qin Zhang, Xin Wang, Kai-Qing Lin, Jing-He Lang","doi":"10.1007/s11655-024-3756-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of Sanjie Analgesic Capsule (SAC) in Chinese patients with endometriosis-associated pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 15 centers between November 2013 and July 2017 in China. Eligible 323 patients with endometriosis were randomized at a 3:1 ratio to the SAC group (241 cases) and placebo group (82 cases) by stratified block randomization. Patients in the SAC or placebo groups were given SAC or placebo 1.6 g 3 times per day, orally, respectively since the first day of menstruation for 3 consecutive menstrual cycles. The primary endpoint was clinical response to dysmenorrhea evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale at 3 and 6 months. The secondary endpoint was the pain score evaluated by VAS (chronic pelvic pain, defecation pain, and dyspareunia) at 3 and 6 months, and the pain recurrence rate at 6 months. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded during the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 women were included in the SAC group, and 82 were in the placebo group. Among these women, 217 (90.0%) and 71 (86.6%) completed the intervention, respectively. At 3 months, overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in women administered SAC (80.1%) compared with those who received a placebo (30.5%, P<0.01). Six months after treatment, the ORR for dysmenorrhea was 62.7% in the SAC group and 31.7% in the placebo group (P<0.01). Chronic pelvic pain and defecation pain were significantly improved by SAC compared with placebo (both P<0.05). The incidence rates of total AEs events in the SAC and placebo groups were 6.6% and 9.8%, respectively, and no significant difference was shown between the two groups (P=0.339).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAC is well-tolerated and may improve dysmenorrhea in women with endometriosis-associated pain. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT02031523).</p>","PeriodicalId":10005,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"780-787"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Sanjie Analgesic Capsule in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Multicenter, 3:1 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jin-Hua Leng, Hua Duan, Zheng Guan, Ying-Fang Zhou, Hong Qu, Kai-Hong Xu, Shao-Fen Zhang, Qin Zhang, Xin Wang, Kai-Qing Lin, Jing-He Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11655-024-3756-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of Sanjie Analgesic Capsule (SAC) in Chinese patients with endometriosis-associated pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 15 centers between November 2013 and July 2017 in China. Eligible 323 patients with endometriosis were randomized at a 3:1 ratio to the SAC group (241 cases) and placebo group (82 cases) by stratified block randomization. Patients in the SAC or placebo groups were given SAC or placebo 1.6 g 3 times per day, orally, respectively since the first day of menstruation for 3 consecutive menstrual cycles. The primary endpoint was clinical response to dysmenorrhea evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale at 3 and 6 months. The secondary endpoint was the pain score evaluated by VAS (chronic pelvic pain, defecation pain, and dyspareunia) at 3 and 6 months, and the pain recurrence rate at 6 months. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded during the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 women were included in the SAC group, and 82 were in the placebo group. Among these women, 217 (90.0%) and 71 (86.6%) completed the intervention, respectively. At 3 months, overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in women administered SAC (80.1%) compared with those who received a placebo (30.5%, P<0.01). Six months after treatment, the ORR for dysmenorrhea was 62.7% in the SAC group and 31.7% in the placebo group (P<0.01). Chronic pelvic pain and defecation pain were significantly improved by SAC compared with placebo (both P<0.05). The incidence rates of total AEs events in the SAC and placebo groups were 6.6% and 9.8%, respectively, and no significant difference was shown between the two groups (P=0.339).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAC is well-tolerated and may improve dysmenorrhea in women with endometriosis-associated pain. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT02031523).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"780-787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-024-3756-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-024-3756-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估三杰止痛胶囊对中国子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛患者的疗效和安全性:评估三杰止痛胶囊(SAC)在中国子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛患者中的疗效和安全性:这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,于 2013 年 11 月至 2017 年 7 月期间在中国的 15 个中心进行。符合条件的323名子宫内膜异位症患者按照3:1的比例,通过分层区组随机法随机分为SAC组(241例)和安慰剂组(82例)。SAC组或安慰剂组患者自月经第一天起,连续3个月经周期分别口服SAC或安慰剂,每次1.6克,每天3次。主要终点是在 3 个月和 6 个月时使用 10 分视觉模拟量表评估痛经的临床反应。次要终点是 3 个月和 6 个月时使用 VAS 评估的疼痛评分(慢性盆腔痛、排便痛和排便困难),以及 6 个月时的疼痛复发率。研究期间记录了不良事件(AEs):共有 241 名妇女被纳入 SAC 组,82 名妇女被纳入安慰剂组。在这些妇女中,分别有 217 人(90.0%)和 71 人(86.6%)完成了干预。3个月后,与服用安慰剂的妇女(30.5%,PC结论)相比,服用SAC的妇女(80.1%)的总体反应率(ORR)明显更高:SAC耐受性良好,可改善子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛妇女的痛经症状。(试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,编号:NCT02031523)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Sanjie Analgesic Capsule in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Multicenter, 3:1 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of Sanjie Analgesic Capsule (SAC) in Chinese patients with endometriosis-associated pain.

Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 15 centers between November 2013 and July 2017 in China. Eligible 323 patients with endometriosis were randomized at a 3:1 ratio to the SAC group (241 cases) and placebo group (82 cases) by stratified block randomization. Patients in the SAC or placebo groups were given SAC or placebo 1.6 g 3 times per day, orally, respectively since the first day of menstruation for 3 consecutive menstrual cycles. The primary endpoint was clinical response to dysmenorrhea evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale at 3 and 6 months. The secondary endpoint was the pain score evaluated by VAS (chronic pelvic pain, defecation pain, and dyspareunia) at 3 and 6 months, and the pain recurrence rate at 6 months. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded during the study.

Results: A total of 241 women were included in the SAC group, and 82 were in the placebo group. Among these women, 217 (90.0%) and 71 (86.6%) completed the intervention, respectively. At 3 months, overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in women administered SAC (80.1%) compared with those who received a placebo (30.5%, P<0.01). Six months after treatment, the ORR for dysmenorrhea was 62.7% in the SAC group and 31.7% in the placebo group (P<0.01). Chronic pelvic pain and defecation pain were significantly improved by SAC compared with placebo (both P<0.05). The incidence rates of total AEs events in the SAC and placebo groups were 6.6% and 9.8%, respectively, and no significant difference was shown between the two groups (P=0.339).

Conclusion: SAC is well-tolerated and may improve dysmenorrhea in women with endometriosis-associated pain. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT02031523).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
2413
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine seeks to promote international communication and exchange on integrative medicine as well as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and provide a rapid forum for the dissemination of scientific articles focusing on the latest developments and trends as well as experiences and achievements on integrative medicine or CAM in clinical practice, scientific research, education and healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信