Thao Vu, Helena Ebeling, Valentina Di Santo, Christopher P Kenaley
{"title":"龙鱼眼睛大小的性别差异是对生物发光信号缺口的反应。","authors":"Thao Vu, Helena Ebeling, Valentina Di Santo, Christopher P Kenaley","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2024.0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep-sea fishes must overcome extremely large nearest-neighbour distances and darkness to find mates. Sexual dimorphism in the size of luminescent structures in many deep-sea taxa, including dragonfishes (family Stomiidae), indicates reproductive behaviours may be mediated by visual signalling. This presents a paradox: if male photophores are larger, females may find males at shorter distances than males find females. Solutions to this gap may include females closing this gap or by males gathering more photons with a larger eye. We examine the eye size of two species of dragonfishes (<i>Malacosteus niger</i> and <i>Phostomias guernei</i>) for sexual dimorphism and employ a model of detection distance to evaluate the potential for such dimorphism to bridge the detection gap. This model incorporates the flux of sexually dimorphic postorbital photophores and eye lens size to predict detection distances. In both species, we found a significant visual detection gap in which females find males before males find females and that male lens size is larger, marking the second known case of size dimorphism in the actinopterygian visual system. Our results indicate the larger eye affords males a significant improvement in detection distance. We conclude that this dimorphic phenotype may have evolved to close the detection gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":9005,"journal":{"name":"Biology Letters","volume":"20 7","pages":"20240165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexually dimorphic eye size in dragonfishes, a response to a bioluminescent signalling gap.\",\"authors\":\"Thao Vu, Helena Ebeling, Valentina Di Santo, Christopher P Kenaley\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsbl.2024.0165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Deep-sea fishes must overcome extremely large nearest-neighbour distances and darkness to find mates. Sexual dimorphism in the size of luminescent structures in many deep-sea taxa, including dragonfishes (family Stomiidae), indicates reproductive behaviours may be mediated by visual signalling. This presents a paradox: if male photophores are larger, females may find males at shorter distances than males find females. Solutions to this gap may include females closing this gap or by males gathering more photons with a larger eye. We examine the eye size of two species of dragonfishes (<i>Malacosteus niger</i> and <i>Phostomias guernei</i>) for sexual dimorphism and employ a model of detection distance to evaluate the potential for such dimorphism to bridge the detection gap. This model incorporates the flux of sexually dimorphic postorbital photophores and eye lens size to predict detection distances. In both species, we found a significant visual detection gap in which females find males before males find females and that male lens size is larger, marking the second known case of size dimorphism in the actinopterygian visual system. Our results indicate the larger eye affords males a significant improvement in detection distance. We conclude that this dimorphic phenotype may have evolved to close the detection gap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Letters\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"20240165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0165\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sexually dimorphic eye size in dragonfishes, a response to a bioluminescent signalling gap.
Deep-sea fishes must overcome extremely large nearest-neighbour distances and darkness to find mates. Sexual dimorphism in the size of luminescent structures in many deep-sea taxa, including dragonfishes (family Stomiidae), indicates reproductive behaviours may be mediated by visual signalling. This presents a paradox: if male photophores are larger, females may find males at shorter distances than males find females. Solutions to this gap may include females closing this gap or by males gathering more photons with a larger eye. We examine the eye size of two species of dragonfishes (Malacosteus niger and Phostomias guernei) for sexual dimorphism and employ a model of detection distance to evaluate the potential for such dimorphism to bridge the detection gap. This model incorporates the flux of sexually dimorphic postorbital photophores and eye lens size to predict detection distances. In both species, we found a significant visual detection gap in which females find males before males find females and that male lens size is larger, marking the second known case of size dimorphism in the actinopterygian visual system. Our results indicate the larger eye affords males a significant improvement in detection distance. We conclude that this dimorphic phenotype may have evolved to close the detection gap.
期刊介绍:
Previously a supplement to Proceedings B, and launched as an independent journal in 2005, Biology Letters is a primarily online, peer-reviewed journal that publishes short, high-quality articles, reviews and opinion pieces from across the biological sciences. The scope of Biology Letters is vast - publishing high-quality research in any area of the biological sciences. However, we have particular strengths in the biology, evolution and ecology of whole organisms. We also publish in other areas of biology, such as molecular ecology and evolution, environmental science, and phylogenetics.