开发用于人口调查的 "对痴呆症患者的四项态度量表"。

Hiroshige Matsumoto, Manami Takaoka, Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani, Ayumi Igarashi
{"title":"开发用于人口调查的 \"对痴呆症患者的四项态度量表\"。","authors":"Hiroshige Matsumoto, Manami Takaoka, Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani, Ayumi Igarashi","doi":"10.1111/psyg.13168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study developed a short version of a scale measuring attitudes toward people living with dementia, the Four-Item Attitudes toward People Living with Dementia Scale (APDS4), that could be included in a large population survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used three datasets from Japan: a web panel survey, a community-based mail survey, and data from a randomised controlled trial on dementia education. The original scale used was the Attitudes toward People Living with Dementia Scale developed by Kim and Kuroda. Test-retest reliability and item response theory analyses were used to reduce the number of items. The reliability, internal consistency, validity, and responsiveness of the short version were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six items with low test-retest reliability and four items with low discrimination parameters were removed from the 14-item scale. The APDS4, consisting of four items, had test-retest reliability and internal consistency comparable to those of the original scale. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the APDS4 fit a unidimensional model. The validity of the APDS4 was confirmed by significant associations between the APDS4 scores and the original scale scores, knowledge of dementia, helping behaviour intentions toward people living with dementia, helping behaviour experience, attending the Dementia Supporter Training Course, and engagement in healthcare jobs. In a randomised controlled trial dataset, the APDS4 was more responsive to educational interventions than the original scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The shortened APDS4 was established as a reliable, validated, and responsive scale. This scale can be used efficiently in population surveys to evaluate dementia-friendly initiatives at the community level.</p>","PeriodicalId":74597,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","volume":" ","pages":"1120-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Four-Item Attitudes toward People Living with Dementia Scale for population surveys.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshige Matsumoto, Manami Takaoka, Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani, Ayumi Igarashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyg.13168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study developed a short version of a scale measuring attitudes toward people living with dementia, the Four-Item Attitudes toward People Living with Dementia Scale (APDS4), that could be included in a large population survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used three datasets from Japan: a web panel survey, a community-based mail survey, and data from a randomised controlled trial on dementia education. The original scale used was the Attitudes toward People Living with Dementia Scale developed by Kim and Kuroda. Test-retest reliability and item response theory analyses were used to reduce the number of items. The reliability, internal consistency, validity, and responsiveness of the short version were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six items with low test-retest reliability and four items with low discrimination parameters were removed from the 14-item scale. The APDS4, consisting of four items, had test-retest reliability and internal consistency comparable to those of the original scale. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the APDS4 fit a unidimensional model. The validity of the APDS4 was confirmed by significant associations between the APDS4 scores and the original scale scores, knowledge of dementia, helping behaviour intentions toward people living with dementia, helping behaviour experience, attending the Dementia Supporter Training Course, and engagement in healthcare jobs. In a randomised controlled trial dataset, the APDS4 was more responsive to educational interventions than the original scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The shortened APDS4 was established as a reliable, validated, and responsive scale. This scale can be used efficiently in population surveys to evaluate dementia-friendly initiatives at the community level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1120-1131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578004/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.13168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.13168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究开发了一个可用于大型人口调查的测量对痴呆症患者态度的简易量表--四项目痴呆症患者态度量表(APDS4):我们使用了日本的三个数据集:网络面板调查、社区邮件调查以及痴呆症教育随机对照试验的数据。最初使用的量表是 Kim 和 Kuroda 编制的 "对痴呆症患者的态度量表"。采用重测信度和项目反应理论分析来减少项目数量。对简版量表的信度、内部一致性、效度和反应度进行了评估:结果:从 14 个项目的量表中删除了 6 个重测信度较低的项目和 4 个辨别参数较低的项目。由四个项目组成的 APDS4 的重测信度和内部一致性与原量表相当。确认性因素分析表明,APDS4 符合单维模型。APDS4得分与原始量表得分、对痴呆症的了解、对痴呆症患者的帮助行为意向、帮助行为经验、参加痴呆症支持者培训课程和从事医疗保健工作之间的显著关联证实了APDS4的有效性。在随机对照试验数据集中,APDS4对教育干预的反应比原量表更灵敏:缩短后的 APDS4 是一个可靠、有效且反应灵敏的量表。该量表可有效地用于人口调查,以评估社区层面的痴呆症友好倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Four-Item Attitudes toward People Living with Dementia Scale for population surveys.

Background: This study developed a short version of a scale measuring attitudes toward people living with dementia, the Four-Item Attitudes toward People Living with Dementia Scale (APDS4), that could be included in a large population survey.

Methods: We used three datasets from Japan: a web panel survey, a community-based mail survey, and data from a randomised controlled trial on dementia education. The original scale used was the Attitudes toward People Living with Dementia Scale developed by Kim and Kuroda. Test-retest reliability and item response theory analyses were used to reduce the number of items. The reliability, internal consistency, validity, and responsiveness of the short version were evaluated.

Results: Six items with low test-retest reliability and four items with low discrimination parameters were removed from the 14-item scale. The APDS4, consisting of four items, had test-retest reliability and internal consistency comparable to those of the original scale. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the APDS4 fit a unidimensional model. The validity of the APDS4 was confirmed by significant associations between the APDS4 scores and the original scale scores, knowledge of dementia, helping behaviour intentions toward people living with dementia, helping behaviour experience, attending the Dementia Supporter Training Course, and engagement in healthcare jobs. In a randomised controlled trial dataset, the APDS4 was more responsive to educational interventions than the original scale.

Conclusion: The shortened APDS4 was established as a reliable, validated, and responsive scale. This scale can be used efficiently in population surveys to evaluate dementia-friendly initiatives at the community level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信