用于英夫利西单抗治疗药物监测的自下而上液相色谱-串联质谱法:方法开发、与两种酶联免疫吸附测定法的比较以及抗药抗体干扰的评估。

Sang-Mi Kim, Hyeonju Oh, Sung Noh Hong, Mi Jin Kim, Yon Ho Choe, Soo-Youn Lee
{"title":"用于英夫利西单抗治疗药物监测的自下而上液相色谱-串联质谱法:方法开发、与两种酶联免疫吸附测定法的比较以及抗药抗体干扰的评估。","authors":"Sang-Mi Kim, Hyeonju Oh, Sung Noh Hong, Mi Jin Kim, Yon Ho Choe, Soo-Youn Lee","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0573-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to optimize infliximab use and improve outcome in chronic inflammatory disorders.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To describe a simple and affordable liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to measure infliximab in serum.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Infliximab was measured using winged stable isotope-labeled peptides as internal standards. Linearity, lower limit of measuring interval, limit of detection, precision, accuracy, carryover, and ion suppression were evaluated. Method comparison against 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods (Remsima Monitor and IDKmonitor Infliximab) and anti-drug antibody (ADA) interference were evaluated using clinical specimens from inflammatory bowel disease patients (N = 237).</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Analytical run time and sample preparation time were 5 minutes per sample and 3 hours per batch, respectively. Analytical measurement interval and limit of detection were 0.50 to 50.0 μg/mL (R2 = 0.998) and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively. The intraday and interday imprecision percentage coefficients of variation were less than 6.1%. Accuracy was 94.2% to 98.7%. No significant ion suppression or carryover was observed. Infliximab concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS showed good agreement with those measured by Remsima Monitor (mean percentage difference, 5.7%; 95% CI, -1.2% to 12.6%) but were markedly lower than those measured by IDKmonitor (-32.6%; -35.8% to -29.4%), demonstrating significant bias between ELISAs. Although a good agreement between LC-MS/MS and ELISA was observed for ADA-negative samples (-3.5%; -12.8% to 5.9%), a significant bias was observed for ADA-positive samples (13.6%; 1.7% to 25.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>This simple, fast, and affordable LC-MS/MS method for infliximab quantitation could improve standardization of infliximab quantitation and optimization of infliximab use in patients with high-titer ADA.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Bottom-Up Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab: Method Development, Comparison With 2 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods, and Evaluation of Anti-Drug Antibody Interference.\",\"authors\":\"Sang-Mi Kim, Hyeonju Oh, Sung Noh Hong, Mi Jin Kim, Yon Ho Choe, Soo-Youn Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2023-0573-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to optimize infliximab use and improve outcome in chronic inflammatory disorders.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To describe a simple and affordable liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to measure infliximab in serum.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Infliximab was measured using winged stable isotope-labeled peptides as internal standards. Linearity, lower limit of measuring interval, limit of detection, precision, accuracy, carryover, and ion suppression were evaluated. Method comparison against 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods (Remsima Monitor and IDKmonitor Infliximab) and anti-drug antibody (ADA) interference were evaluated using clinical specimens from inflammatory bowel disease patients (N = 237).</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Analytical run time and sample preparation time were 5 minutes per sample and 3 hours per batch, respectively. Analytical measurement interval and limit of detection were 0.50 to 50.0 μg/mL (R2 = 0.998) and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively. The intraday and interday imprecision percentage coefficients of variation were less than 6.1%. Accuracy was 94.2% to 98.7%. No significant ion suppression or carryover was observed. Infliximab concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS showed good agreement with those measured by Remsima Monitor (mean percentage difference, 5.7%; 95% CI, -1.2% to 12.6%) but were markedly lower than those measured by IDKmonitor (-32.6%; -35.8% to -29.4%), demonstrating significant bias between ELISAs. Although a good agreement between LC-MS/MS and ELISA was observed for ADA-negative samples (-3.5%; -12.8% to 5.9%), a significant bias was observed for ADA-positive samples (13.6%; 1.7% to 25.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>This simple, fast, and affordable LC-MS/MS method for infliximab quantitation could improve standardization of infliximab quantitation and optimization of infliximab use in patients with high-titer ADA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0573-OA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0573-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景建议进行治疗药物监测,以优化英夫利西单抗的使用并改善慢性炎症性疾病的治疗效果:描述一种简单、经济的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)方法来检测血清中的英夫利西单抗:采用翼型稳定同位素标记肽作为内标物,测定血清中的英夫利西单抗。评估了线性、测量间隔下限、检测限、精密度、准确度、携带和离子抑制。使用炎症性肠病患者(237 人)的临床样本,评估了该方法与两种酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)方法(Remsima Monitor 和 IDKmonitor Infliximab)的比较以及抗药物抗体(ADA)的干扰:分析运行时间和样品制备时间分别为每个样品 5 分钟和每个批次 3 小时。分析测量间隔和检测限分别为 0.50 至 50.0 微克/毫升(R2 = 0.998)和 0.25 微克/毫升。日内和日间不精确度百分比变异系数小于 6.1%。准确度为 94.2% 至 98.7%。未观察到明显的离子抑制或携带现象。LC-MS/MS 测得的英夫利西单抗浓度与 Remsima Monitor 测得的浓度显示出良好的一致性(平均百分比差异为 5.7%;95% CI,-1.2% 至 12.6%),但明显低于 IDKmonitor 测得的浓度(-32.6%;-35.8% 至 -29.4%),这表明 ELISA 之间存在明显偏差。虽然在 ADA 阴性样本中 LC-MS/MS 和 ELISA 的一致性很好(-3.5%;-12.8% 至 5.9%),但在 ADA 阳性样本中却发现了明显的偏差(13.6%;1.7% 至 25.6%):这种简单、快速、经济的LC-MS/MS方法用于英夫利昔单抗的定量分析,可以提高英夫利昔单抗定量分析的标准化程度,优化高滴度ADA患者英夫利昔单抗的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Bottom-Up Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab: Method Development, Comparison With 2 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods, and Evaluation of Anti-Drug Antibody Interference.

Context.—: Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to optimize infliximab use and improve outcome in chronic inflammatory disorders.

Objective.—: To describe a simple and affordable liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to measure infliximab in serum.

Design.—: Infliximab was measured using winged stable isotope-labeled peptides as internal standards. Linearity, lower limit of measuring interval, limit of detection, precision, accuracy, carryover, and ion suppression were evaluated. Method comparison against 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods (Remsima Monitor and IDKmonitor Infliximab) and anti-drug antibody (ADA) interference were evaluated using clinical specimens from inflammatory bowel disease patients (N = 237).

Results.—: Analytical run time and sample preparation time were 5 minutes per sample and 3 hours per batch, respectively. Analytical measurement interval and limit of detection were 0.50 to 50.0 μg/mL (R2 = 0.998) and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively. The intraday and interday imprecision percentage coefficients of variation were less than 6.1%. Accuracy was 94.2% to 98.7%. No significant ion suppression or carryover was observed. Infliximab concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS showed good agreement with those measured by Remsima Monitor (mean percentage difference, 5.7%; 95% CI, -1.2% to 12.6%) but were markedly lower than those measured by IDKmonitor (-32.6%; -35.8% to -29.4%), demonstrating significant bias between ELISAs. Although a good agreement between LC-MS/MS and ELISA was observed for ADA-negative samples (-3.5%; -12.8% to 5.9%), a significant bias was observed for ADA-positive samples (13.6%; 1.7% to 25.6%).

Conclusions.—: This simple, fast, and affordable LC-MS/MS method for infliximab quantitation could improve standardization of infliximab quantitation and optimization of infliximab use in patients with high-titer ADA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信