全球灌注实践调查:值班室和急诊手术室的准备情况。

Salman Pervaiz Butt, Yasir Saleem, Nuno Raposo, Umer Darr, Gopal Bhatnagar
{"title":"全球灌注实践调查:值班室和急诊手术室的准备情况。","authors":"Salman Pervaiz Butt, Yasir Saleem, Nuno Raposo, Umer Darr, Gopal Bhatnagar","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perfusion safety in cardiac surgery is vital, and this survey explores perfusion practices, perspectives, and challenges related to it. Specifically, it examines the readiness of on-call and emergency operation rooms for perfusion-related procedures during urgent situations. The aim is to identify gaps and enhance perfusion safety protocols, ultimately improving patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a preliminary survey conducted as an initial exploration before committing to a comprehensive study. The sample size was primarily determined based on a one-month time frame. The survey collected data from 236 healthcare professionals, including cardiac surgeons, perfusionists, and anesthetists, using an online platform. Ethical considerations ensured participant anonymity and voluntary participation. The survey comprised multiple-choice and open-ended questions to gather quantitative and qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey found that 53% preferred a dry circuit ready for emergencies, 19.9% preferred primed circuits, and 19.1% chose not to have a ready pump at all. Various reasons influenced these choices, including caseload variations, response times, historical practices, surgeon preferences, and backup perfusionist availability. Infection risk, concerns about error, and team dynamics were additional factors affecting circuit readiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey sheds light on current perfusion practices and challenges, emphasizing the importance of standardized protocols in regards to readiness of on-call and emergency operation rooms. It provides valuable insights for advancing perfusion safety and patient care while contributing to the existing literature on the subject.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Perfusion Practice Survey: Readiness of On-Call and Emergency Operation Rooms.\",\"authors\":\"Salman Pervaiz Butt, Yasir Saleem, Nuno Raposo, Umer Darr, Gopal Bhatnagar\",\"doi\":\"10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perfusion safety in cardiac surgery is vital, and this survey explores perfusion practices, perspectives, and challenges related to it. Specifically, it examines the readiness of on-call and emergency operation rooms for perfusion-related procedures during urgent situations. The aim is to identify gaps and enhance perfusion safety protocols, ultimately improving patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a preliminary survey conducted as an initial exploration before committing to a comprehensive study. The sample size was primarily determined based on a one-month time frame. The survey collected data from 236 healthcare professionals, including cardiac surgeons, perfusionists, and anesthetists, using an online platform. Ethical considerations ensured participant anonymity and voluntary participation. The survey comprised multiple-choice and open-ended questions to gather quantitative and qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey found that 53% preferred a dry circuit ready for emergencies, 19.9% preferred primed circuits, and 19.1% chose not to have a ready pump at all. Various reasons influenced these choices, including caseload variations, response times, historical practices, surgeon preferences, and backup perfusionist availability. Infection risk, concerns about error, and team dynamics were additional factors affecting circuit readiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey sheds light on current perfusion practices and challenges, emphasizing the importance of standardized protocols in regards to readiness of on-call and emergency operation rooms. It provides valuable insights for advancing perfusion safety and patient care while contributing to the existing literature on the subject.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:心脏手术中的灌注安全至关重要,本调查探讨了与之相关的灌注实践、观点和挑战。具体而言,它调查了值班室和急诊手术室在紧急情况下进行灌注相关手术的准备情况。目的是找出差距,加强灌注安全协议,最终改善患者护理:这是一项初步调查,是进行全面研究前的初步探索。样本量主要根据一个月的时间框架确定。调查利用在线平台收集了 236 名医护人员的数据,其中包括心脏外科医生、灌注师和麻醉师。伦理方面的考虑确保了参与者的匿名性和自愿参与性。调查包括多项选择题和开放式问题,以收集定量和定性数据:调查发现,53% 的人倾向于使用干式回路以备不时之需,19.9% 的人倾向于使用预注回路,19.1% 的人选择完全不使用预注泵。影响这些选择的原因多种多样,包括病例量的变化、响应时间、历史惯例、外科医生的偏好以及后备灌注师的可用性。感染风险、对错误的担忧以及团队活力也是影响回路准备情况的因素:这项调查揭示了当前的灌注实践和挑战,强调了标准化协议对待命和急诊手术室准备工作的重要性。它为促进灌注安全和患者护理提供了有价值的见解,同时也为有关该主题的现有文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Perfusion Practice Survey: Readiness of On-Call and Emergency Operation Rooms.

Introduction: Perfusion safety in cardiac surgery is vital, and this survey explores perfusion practices, perspectives, and challenges related to it. Specifically, it examines the readiness of on-call and emergency operation rooms for perfusion-related procedures during urgent situations. The aim is to identify gaps and enhance perfusion safety protocols, ultimately improving patient care.

Methods: This was a preliminary survey conducted as an initial exploration before committing to a comprehensive study. The sample size was primarily determined based on a one-month time frame. The survey collected data from 236 healthcare professionals, including cardiac surgeons, perfusionists, and anesthetists, using an online platform. Ethical considerations ensured participant anonymity and voluntary participation. The survey comprised multiple-choice and open-ended questions to gather quantitative and qualitative data.

Results: The survey found that 53% preferred a dry circuit ready for emergencies, 19.9% preferred primed circuits, and 19.1% chose not to have a ready pump at all. Various reasons influenced these choices, including caseload variations, response times, historical practices, surgeon preferences, and backup perfusionist availability. Infection risk, concerns about error, and team dynamics were additional factors affecting circuit readiness.

Conclusion: This survey sheds light on current perfusion practices and challenges, emphasizing the importance of standardized protocols in regards to readiness of on-call and emergency operation rooms. It provides valuable insights for advancing perfusion safety and patient care while contributing to the existing literature on the subject.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信