以人为本的初级保健测量》的荷兰语翻译和心理测量评估。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Talitha Schut, Bernard van de Meeberg, Peter Lucassen, Rebecca S Etz, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Reinier P Akkermans, Tim C. Olde Hartman
{"title":"以人为本的初级保健测量》的荷兰语翻译和心理测量评估。","authors":"Talitha Schut, Bernard van de Meeberg, Peter Lucassen, Rebecca S Etz, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Reinier P Akkermans, Tim C. Olde Hartman","doi":"10.1370/afm.3135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Person-centered care is foundational to good quality primary care and has positive effects on health outcomes and patient satisfaction. The Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) is a recently developed, patient-reported survey able to assess person-centeredness and has demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Little is known, however, about the feasibility of the PCPCM in non-English-speaking settings. We aimed to translate the questionnaire into Dutch, psychometrically evaluate the translated version, and ensure its feasibility for patients in Dutch primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We translated the PCPCM into Dutch using forward-backward translations. We conducted psychometric evaluations to ensure its feasibility among Dutch-speaking primary care patients, with special attention to low literacy populations. Next, we assessed structural validity, convergent validity using the Quality of Care Through the Patient's Eyes (QUOTE) questionnaire, and internal consistency in a cross-sectional study in primary care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Translation and adaptation for low literacy populations required 4 iterations. In 4 general practices, 205 patients completed the survey. Confirmatory factor analyses could not confirm the 1-factor solution. The 3-factor solution was found to be a more optimal fit: comprehensiveness of care, personal relation, and contextual care. Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α were 0.82, 0.73, and 0.86, respectively). We found a strong correlation between the total PCPCM and QUOTE scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.65, <i>P</i> <.001), indicating good convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Dutch version of the PCPCM has acceptable validity and reliability for measuring person-centeredness in primary care among Dutch-speaking populations including those with low literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"22 4","pages":"288-293"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dutch Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure.\",\"authors\":\"Talitha Schut, Bernard van de Meeberg, Peter Lucassen, Rebecca S Etz, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Reinier P Akkermans, Tim C. Olde Hartman\",\"doi\":\"10.1370/afm.3135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Person-centered care is foundational to good quality primary care and has positive effects on health outcomes and patient satisfaction. The Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) is a recently developed, patient-reported survey able to assess person-centeredness and has demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Little is known, however, about the feasibility of the PCPCM in non-English-speaking settings. We aimed to translate the questionnaire into Dutch, psychometrically evaluate the translated version, and ensure its feasibility for patients in Dutch primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We translated the PCPCM into Dutch using forward-backward translations. We conducted psychometric evaluations to ensure its feasibility among Dutch-speaking primary care patients, with special attention to low literacy populations. Next, we assessed structural validity, convergent validity using the Quality of Care Through the Patient's Eyes (QUOTE) questionnaire, and internal consistency in a cross-sectional study in primary care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Translation and adaptation for low literacy populations required 4 iterations. In 4 general practices, 205 patients completed the survey. Confirmatory factor analyses could not confirm the 1-factor solution. The 3-factor solution was found to be a more optimal fit: comprehensiveness of care, personal relation, and contextual care. Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α were 0.82, 0.73, and 0.86, respectively). We found a strong correlation between the total PCPCM and QUOTE scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.65, <i>P</i> <.001), indicating good convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Dutch version of the PCPCM has acceptable validity and reliability for measuring person-centeredness in primary care among Dutch-speaking populations including those with low literacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"288-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268680/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3135\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以人为本的护理是优质初级保健的基础,对健康结果和患者满意度有积极影响。以人为本的初级保健测量(PCPCM)是最近开发的一项由患者报告的调查,能够评估以人为本的程度,并已证明具有很强的有效性和可靠性。然而,人们对 PCPCM 在非英语环境中的可行性知之甚少。我们的目的是将该问卷翻译成荷兰语,对翻译版本进行心理计量学评估,并确保其在荷兰初级医疗机构的可行性:方法:我们采用向前向后翻译法将 PCPCM 翻译成荷兰语。我们进行了心理测量评估,以确保其在讲荷兰语的初级医疗患者中的可行性,并特别关注低文化程度人群。接下来,我们使用 "患者眼中的护理质量"(QUOTE)问卷评估了结构效度、收敛效度,并在一项初级保健横断面研究中评估了内部一致性:结果:针对低文化水平人群的翻译和调整需要反复进行 4 次。在 4 家全科诊所,205 名患者完成了调查。确认性因素分析无法确认单因素解决方案。结果发现,3 个因子的解决方案更为理想:护理的全面性、个人关系和情境护理。内部信度很高(Cronbach's α 分别为 0.82、0.73 和 0.86)。我们发现,PCPCM 总分与 QUOTE 分数之间存在很强的相关性(Spearman's ρ = 0.65,P 结论):荷兰语版本的 PCPCM 具有可接受的有效性和可靠性,可用于测量包括识字率较低人群在内的讲荷兰语人群在初级保健中以人为中心的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dutch Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure.

Purpose: Person-centered care is foundational to good quality primary care and has positive effects on health outcomes and patient satisfaction. The Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) is a recently developed, patient-reported survey able to assess person-centeredness and has demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Little is known, however, about the feasibility of the PCPCM in non-English-speaking settings. We aimed to translate the questionnaire into Dutch, psychometrically evaluate the translated version, and ensure its feasibility for patients in Dutch primary care.

Methods: We translated the PCPCM into Dutch using forward-backward translations. We conducted psychometric evaluations to ensure its feasibility among Dutch-speaking primary care patients, with special attention to low literacy populations. Next, we assessed structural validity, convergent validity using the Quality of Care Through the Patient's Eyes (QUOTE) questionnaire, and internal consistency in a cross-sectional study in primary care.

Results: Translation and adaptation for low literacy populations required 4 iterations. In 4 general practices, 205 patients completed the survey. Confirmatory factor analyses could not confirm the 1-factor solution. The 3-factor solution was found to be a more optimal fit: comprehensiveness of care, personal relation, and contextual care. Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α were 0.82, 0.73, and 0.86, respectively). We found a strong correlation between the total PCPCM and QUOTE scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.65, P <.001), indicating good convergent validity.

Conclusion: The Dutch version of the PCPCM has acceptable validity and reliability for measuring person-centeredness in primary care among Dutch-speaking populations including those with low literacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信