肩胛肱骨牵引术(SHD)治疗肩关节前脱位的评估。随机对照试验。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Georgios Kalinterakis, Georgios Velivasakis, Konstantinos Balaouras, Georgios Psilomanousakis, Emmanouil Daskalogiannakis, Konstantinos Mastrantonakis
{"title":"肩胛肱骨牵引术(SHD)治疗肩关节前脱位的评估。随机对照试验。","authors":"Georgios Kalinterakis, Georgios Velivasakis, Konstantinos Balaouras, Georgios Psilomanousakis, Emmanouil Daskalogiannakis, Konstantinos Mastrantonakis","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shoulder dislocation is a common injury presenting in emergency Department. Numerous methods have been described in the literature for glenohumeral reduction. These methods can be divided into two groups: traction maneuvers and the combination of traction with scapula manipulation techniques. In this article, we introduced a new maneuver for shoulder reduction, namely, the combination of traction with handling the scapula (scapulohumeral distraction, SHD) and compare it to the Hippocratic Method (HT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study took place from November 2021 to September 2023. A total of 96 patients with acute anterior shoulder dislocation were enrolled in the study. Eighty-seven patients, who met all inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (SHD and HM). We evaluated each method for success rate, time to relocation, complications over a follow-up period of one month, patients' satisfaction and pain level during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods had comparable success rates (SHD 95.3% vs. HM 93.2%, p=.833) while no complications where observed. However, SHD method required significantly less procedure time (p=.001). Moreover, patients in SHD group reported significantly less pain (p=.012) and greater satisfaction (p=.003) levels. Furthermore, when we assessed relocation time, pain and patient satisfaction as a function of recurrence, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 techniques. Similarly, the evaluation of relocation time for both techniques as a function of BMI and age did not indicate statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scapulohumeral distraction technique (SHD) represents a safe, anatomically based and simple method for shoulder reduction. It showed a statistically significant decrease in relocation time and pain, with patients mentioned higher satisfaction rates compared to the classical Hippocratic method. Nonetheless, there were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Scapulohumeral Distraction (SHD) technique for anterior shoulder dislocation. A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Georgios Kalinterakis, Georgios Velivasakis, Konstantinos Balaouras, Georgios Psilomanousakis, Emmanouil Daskalogiannakis, Konstantinos Mastrantonakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shoulder dislocation is a common injury presenting in emergency Department. Numerous methods have been described in the literature for glenohumeral reduction. These methods can be divided into two groups: traction maneuvers and the combination of traction with scapula manipulation techniques. In this article, we introduced a new maneuver for shoulder reduction, namely, the combination of traction with handling the scapula (scapulohumeral distraction, SHD) and compare it to the Hippocratic Method (HT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study took place from November 2021 to September 2023. A total of 96 patients with acute anterior shoulder dislocation were enrolled in the study. Eighty-seven patients, who met all inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (SHD and HM). We evaluated each method for success rate, time to relocation, complications over a follow-up period of one month, patients' satisfaction and pain level during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods had comparable success rates (SHD 95.3% vs. HM 93.2%, p=.833) while no complications where observed. However, SHD method required significantly less procedure time (p=.001). Moreover, patients in SHD group reported significantly less pain (p=.012) and greater satisfaction (p=.003) levels. Furthermore, when we assessed relocation time, pain and patient satisfaction as a function of recurrence, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 techniques. Similarly, the evaluation of relocation time for both techniques as a function of BMI and age did not indicate statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scapulohumeral distraction technique (SHD) represents a safe, anatomically based and simple method for shoulder reduction. It showed a statistically significant decrease in relocation time and pain, with patients mentioned higher satisfaction rates compared to the classical Hippocratic method. Nonetheless, there were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding success rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言肩关节脱位是急诊科常见的损伤。文献中描述了许多盂肱关节复位的方法。这些方法可分为两类:牵引手法和牵引与肩胛骨手法相结合的手法。在本文中,我们介绍了一种新的肩关节牵引手法,即牵引与肩胛骨操作相结合(肩胛骨-肱骨牵引,SHD),并将其与希波克拉底方法(HT)进行了比较:研究时间为 2021 年 11 月至 2023 年 9 月。共有 96 名急性肩关节前脱位患者参与了研究。符合所有纳入标准的 87 名患者被随机分配到两组(SHD 和 HM)中的一组。我们对每种方法的成功率、搬迁时间、随访一个月期间的并发症、患者满意度和手术过程中的疼痛程度进行了评估:两种方法的成功率相当(SHD 95.3% 对 HM 93.2%,P=.833),均未发现并发症。不过,SHD 方法所需的手术时间明显更短(p=.001)。此外,SHD 组患者的疼痛感(p=.012)和满意度(p=.003)均明显降低。此外,当我们评估作为复发函数的搬迁时间、疼痛和患者满意度时,两种技术之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异。同样,根据体重指数(BMI)和年龄对两种技术的搬迁时间进行评估,也未发现统计学上的显著差异:结论:肩胛骨-肱骨牵张术(SHD)是一种安全、基于解剖学原理且简单的肩关节减张方法。与传统的希波克拉底方法相比,该方法在统计学上显着减少了移位时间和疼痛,患者的满意度也更高。尽管如此,两种技术在成功率方面并无统计学意义上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Scapulohumeral Distraction (SHD) technique for anterior shoulder dislocation. A randomized controlled trial.

Introduction: Shoulder dislocation is a common injury presenting in emergency Department. Numerous methods have been described in the literature for glenohumeral reduction. These methods can be divided into two groups: traction maneuvers and the combination of traction with scapula manipulation techniques. In this article, we introduced a new maneuver for shoulder reduction, namely, the combination of traction with handling the scapula (scapulohumeral distraction, SHD) and compare it to the Hippocratic Method (HT).

Materials and methods: The study took place from November 2021 to September 2023. A total of 96 patients with acute anterior shoulder dislocation were enrolled in the study. Eighty-seven patients, who met all inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (SHD and HM). We evaluated each method for success rate, time to relocation, complications over a follow-up period of one month, patients' satisfaction and pain level during the procedure.

Results: Both methods had comparable success rates (SHD 95.3% vs. HM 93.2%, p=.833) while no complications where observed. However, SHD method required significantly less procedure time (p=.001). Moreover, patients in SHD group reported significantly less pain (p=.012) and greater satisfaction (p=.003) levels. Furthermore, when we assessed relocation time, pain and patient satisfaction as a function of recurrence, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 techniques. Similarly, the evaluation of relocation time for both techniques as a function of BMI and age did not indicate statistically significant differences.

Conclusion: Scapulohumeral distraction technique (SHD) represents a safe, anatomically based and simple method for shoulder reduction. It showed a statistically significant decrease in relocation time and pain, with patients mentioned higher satisfaction rates compared to the classical Hippocratic method. Nonetheless, there were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding success rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信