两个肾脏的故事,以及南非的机器灌注案例。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
N B Leech, Z Keyser, D E Du Plessis, V Soyizwapi, L Bertels, T Du Toit
{"title":"两个肾脏的故事,以及南非的机器灌注案例。","authors":"N B Leech, Z Keyser, D E Du Plessis, V Soyizwapi, L Bertels, T Du Toit","doi":"10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extended-criteria donors (ECDs) are seen as a means of addressing the shortfall in solid-organ availability for transplant. However, the use of ECD kidneys is associated with a greater risk of primary non-function compared with standard-criteria donor kidneys, and a higher discard rate has been described internationally. There seems to be a lack of consensus in the consideration of ECD kidneys for transplant, with reliance often placed on the subjective assessment of individual clinicians. The following case examines the difference in the institutional decision-making process applied to two kidneys from a single donor, and provides an argument for the use of hypothermic machine perfusion in low- to middle-income countries as an efficacious and objective means of assessing ECD kidney suitability.</p>","PeriodicalId":49576,"journal":{"name":"Samj South African Medical Journal","volume":"114 3b","pages":"e1328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A tale of two kidneys, and the case for machine perfusion in South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"N B Leech, Z Keyser, D E Du Plessis, V Soyizwapi, L Bertels, T Du Toit\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extended-criteria donors (ECDs) are seen as a means of addressing the shortfall in solid-organ availability for transplant. However, the use of ECD kidneys is associated with a greater risk of primary non-function compared with standard-criteria donor kidneys, and a higher discard rate has been described internationally. There seems to be a lack of consensus in the consideration of ECD kidneys for transplant, with reliance often placed on the subjective assessment of individual clinicians. The following case examines the difference in the institutional decision-making process applied to two kidneys from a single donor, and provides an argument for the use of hypothermic machine perfusion in low- to middle-income countries as an efficacious and objective means of assessing ECD kidney suitability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Samj South African Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"114 3b\",\"pages\":\"e1328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Samj South African Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1328\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Samj South African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扩展标准捐献者(ECD)被认为是解决用于移植的实体器官供应不足的一种手段。然而,与标准标准捐献者的肾脏相比,使用 ECD 肾脏会有更大的原发性无功能风险,而且国际上也有废弃率较高的描述。在考虑将 ECD 肾脏用于移植方面似乎缺乏共识,往往依赖于个别临床医生的主观评估。下面的病例探讨了机构决策过程中适用于来自单一供体的两个肾脏的差异,并为在中低收入国家使用低温机器灌注作为评估 ECD 肾脏适用性的有效而客观的方法提供了论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A tale of two kidneys, and the case for machine perfusion in South Africa.

Extended-criteria donors (ECDs) are seen as a means of addressing the shortfall in solid-organ availability for transplant. However, the use of ECD kidneys is associated with a greater risk of primary non-function compared with standard-criteria donor kidneys, and a higher discard rate has been described internationally. There seems to be a lack of consensus in the consideration of ECD kidneys for transplant, with reliance often placed on the subjective assessment of individual clinicians. The following case examines the difference in the institutional decision-making process applied to two kidneys from a single donor, and provides an argument for the use of hypothermic machine perfusion in low- to middle-income countries as an efficacious and objective means of assessing ECD kidney suitability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Samj South African Medical Journal
Samj South African Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
175
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAMJ is a monthly peer reviewed, internationally indexed, general medical journal. It carries The SAMJ is a monthly, peer-reviewed, internationally indexed, general medical journal publishing leading research impacting clinical care in Africa. The Journal is not limited to articles that have ‘general medical content’, but is intending to capture the spectrum of medical and health sciences, grouped by relevance to the country’s burden of disease. This will include research in the social sciences and economics that is relevant to the medical issues around our burden of disease The journal carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other medical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries, general correspondence, and classified advertisements (refer to the section policies for further information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信