持有私人医疗保险的病人的把关和转诊:对挪威全科医生的调查。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jørgen Breivold, Karin Isaksson Rø, Stein Nilsen, Merethe Kristine Kousgaard Andersen, Jørgen Nexøe, Stefán Hjörleifsson
{"title":"持有私人医疗保险的病人的把关和转诊:对挪威全科医生的调查。","authors":"Jørgen Breivold, Karin Isaksson Rø, Stein Nilsen, Merethe Kristine Kousgaard Andersen, Jørgen Nexøe, Stefán Hjörleifsson","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Private health insurance is becoming more common in Norway. The aim of this study was to investigate GPs' opinions on private health insurance, and their experiences from consultations where health insurance can affect decisions about referring.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A web based cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Norwegian general practice.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>All GPs in Norway were in 2019 invited to participate in an online survey.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The GPs' opinions and experiences regarding health insurance were reported as proportions. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations between how frequently GPs refer patients without further considerations and variables concerning their characteristics, opinions, and experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,309 GPs (response rate 27%), 93% stated that private health insurance raises the risk of overtreatment and 90% considered such insurance to contribute to inequality in health. Frequently being pressured to refer in the absence of a medical indication was reported by 42%. Moreover, 28% often or always chose to refer patients without further consideration, and this was associated with perceptions of pressure with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.73-5.29, and unpleasant reactions from patients following refusals (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most participating GPs associated private health insurance with overtreatment and inequality in health, more than one in four choose to refer without further consideration. GPs' experience of pressure to refer and negative reactions from patients when they consider referrals not to be medically indicated, raises the risk of medical overuse for patients holding private health insurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"695-703"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gatekeeping and referral of patients holding private health insurance: a survey among general practitioners in Norway.\",\"authors\":\"Jørgen Breivold, Karin Isaksson Rø, Stein Nilsen, Merethe Kristine Kousgaard Andersen, Jørgen Nexøe, Stefán Hjörleifsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Private health insurance is becoming more common in Norway. The aim of this study was to investigate GPs' opinions on private health insurance, and their experiences from consultations where health insurance can affect decisions about referring.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A web based cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Norwegian general practice.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>All GPs in Norway were in 2019 invited to participate in an online survey.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The GPs' opinions and experiences regarding health insurance were reported as proportions. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations between how frequently GPs refer patients without further considerations and variables concerning their characteristics, opinions, and experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,309 GPs (response rate 27%), 93% stated that private health insurance raises the risk of overtreatment and 90% considered such insurance to contribute to inequality in health. Frequently being pressured to refer in the absence of a medical indication was reported by 42%. Moreover, 28% often or always chose to refer patients without further consideration, and this was associated with perceptions of pressure with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.73-5.29, and unpleasant reactions from patients following refusals (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most participating GPs associated private health insurance with overtreatment and inequality in health, more than one in four choose to refer without further consideration. GPs' experience of pressure to refer and negative reactions from patients when they consider referrals not to be medically indicated, raises the risk of medical overuse for patients holding private health insurance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"695-703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在挪威,私人医疗保险越来越普遍。本研究旨在调查全科医生对私人医疗保险的看法,以及他们在医疗保险可能影响转诊决定的情况下的咨询经验:设计:基于网络的横断面调查:调查对象:挪威全科医生:主要结果指标:全科医生对私人医疗保险的看法和经验:全科医生对医疗保险的看法和经验以比例形式报告。采用多元逻辑回归法检验全科医生在不做进一步考虑的情况下转诊患者的频率与他们的特征、观点和经验等变量之间的关联:在 1,309 名全科医生中(回复率为 27%),93% 的人表示私人医疗保险会增加过度治疗的风险,90% 的人认为私人医疗保险会导致健康不平等。42%的全科医生表示,在没有医学指征的情况下,他们经常被迫转诊。此外,28%的全科医生经常或总是在没有进一步考虑的情况下选择转诊病人,这与压力感有关,调整后的几率比(AOR)为3.80,95%置信区间(CI)为2.73-5.29,还与病人拒绝后的不愉快反应有关(AOR为1.63,95%置信区间(CI)为1.14-2.33):尽管大多数参与调查的全科医生都认为私人医疗保险与过度治疗和健康不平等有关,但每四名全科医生中就有一名以上选择转诊而不做进一步考虑。全科医生面临转诊压力,而当他们认为转诊不符合医疗要求时,患者又会做出负面反应,这就增加了持有私人医疗保险的患者过度使用医疗服务的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gatekeeping and referral of patients holding private health insurance: a survey among general practitioners in Norway.

Objective: Private health insurance is becoming more common in Norway. The aim of this study was to investigate GPs' opinions on private health insurance, and their experiences from consultations where health insurance can affect decisions about referring.

Design: A web based cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Norwegian general practice.

Subjects: All GPs in Norway were in 2019 invited to participate in an online survey.

Main outcome measures: The GPs' opinions and experiences regarding health insurance were reported as proportions. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations between how frequently GPs refer patients without further considerations and variables concerning their characteristics, opinions, and experiences.

Results: Of 1,309 GPs (response rate 27%), 93% stated that private health insurance raises the risk of overtreatment and 90% considered such insurance to contribute to inequality in health. Frequently being pressured to refer in the absence of a medical indication was reported by 42%. Moreover, 28% often or always chose to refer patients without further consideration, and this was associated with perceptions of pressure with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.73-5.29, and unpleasant reactions from patients following refusals (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.33).

Conclusion: Although most participating GPs associated private health insurance with overtreatment and inequality in health, more than one in four choose to refer without further consideration. GPs' experience of pressure to refer and negative reactions from patients when they consider referrals not to be medically indicated, raises the risk of medical overuse for patients holding private health insurance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信