通过机器学习算法建立原发性膜性肾病与非原发性膜性肾病的鉴别诊断模型。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Renal Failure Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1080/0886022X.2024.2380752
Shangmei Cao, Shaozhe Yang, Bolin Chen, Xixia Chen, Xiuhong Fu, Shuifu Tang
{"title":"通过机器学习算法建立原发性膜性肾病与非原发性膜性肾病的鉴别诊断模型。","authors":"Shangmei Cao, Shaozhe Yang, Bolin Chen, Xixia Chen, Xiuhong Fu, Shuifu Tang","doi":"10.1080/0886022X.2024.2380752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Four algorithms with relatively balanced complexity and accuracy in deep learning classification algorithm were selected for differential diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy (PMN).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the most suitable classification algorithm for PMN identification, and to provide data reference for PMN diagnosis research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 500 patients were referred to Luo-he Central Hospital from 2019 to 2021. All patients were diagnosed with primary glomerular disease confirmed by renal biopsy, contained 322 cases of PMN, the 178 cases of non-PMN. Using the decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) to establish a differential diagnosis model for PMN and non-PMN. Based on the true positive rate, true negative rate, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, accuracy, feature work area under the curve (AUC) of subjects, the best performance of the model was chosen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The efficiency of the Xgboost model based on the above evaluation indicators was the highest, which the diagnosis of PMN of the sensitivity and specificity, respectively 92% and 96%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The differential diagnosis model for PMN was established successfully and the efficiency performance of the Xgboost model was the best. It could be used for the clinical diagnosis of PMN.</p>","PeriodicalId":20839,"journal":{"name":"Renal Failure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a differential diagnosis model between primary membranous nephropathy and non-primary membranous nephropathy by machine learning algorithms.\",\"authors\":\"Shangmei Cao, Shaozhe Yang, Bolin Chen, Xixia Chen, Xiuhong Fu, Shuifu Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0886022X.2024.2380752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Four algorithms with relatively balanced complexity and accuracy in deep learning classification algorithm were selected for differential diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy (PMN).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the most suitable classification algorithm for PMN identification, and to provide data reference for PMN diagnosis research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 500 patients were referred to Luo-he Central Hospital from 2019 to 2021. All patients were diagnosed with primary glomerular disease confirmed by renal biopsy, contained 322 cases of PMN, the 178 cases of non-PMN. Using the decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) to establish a differential diagnosis model for PMN and non-PMN. Based on the true positive rate, true negative rate, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, accuracy, feature work area under the curve (AUC) of subjects, the best performance of the model was chosen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The efficiency of the Xgboost model based on the above evaluation indicators was the highest, which the diagnosis of PMN of the sensitivity and specificity, respectively 92% and 96%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The differential diagnosis model for PMN was established successfully and the efficiency performance of the Xgboost model was the best. It could be used for the clinical diagnosis of PMN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renal Failure\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268222/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renal Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2380752\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2380752","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景选择深度学习分类算法中复杂度和准确度相对均衡的四种算法用于原发性膜性肾病(PMN)的鉴别诊断:本研究探索最适合PMN鉴别的分类算法,为PMN诊断研究提供数据参考:2019年至2021年,漯河市中心医院共转诊500例患者。所有患者均经肾活检确诊为原发性肾小球疾病,其中322例为PMN,178例为非PMN。采用决策树、随机森林、支持向量机、极梯度提升(Xgboost)等方法建立PMN与非PMN的鉴别诊断模型。根据受试者的真阳性率、真阴性率、假阳性率、假阴性率、准确率、特征工作曲线下面积(AUC),选出了性能最佳的模型:基于上述评价指标的 Xgboost 模型效率最高,其诊断 PMN 的灵敏度和特异度分别为 92% 和 96%:结论:成功建立了 PMN 的鉴别诊断模型,其中 Xgboost 模型的效率表现最佳。该模型可用于 PMN 的临床诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing a differential diagnosis model between primary membranous nephropathy and non-primary membranous nephropathy by machine learning algorithms.

Context: Four algorithms with relatively balanced complexity and accuracy in deep learning classification algorithm were selected for differential diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy (PMN).

Objective: This study explored the most suitable classification algorithm for PMN identification, and to provide data reference for PMN diagnosis research.

Methods: A total of 500 patients were referred to Luo-he Central Hospital from 2019 to 2021. All patients were diagnosed with primary glomerular disease confirmed by renal biopsy, contained 322 cases of PMN, the 178 cases of non-PMN. Using the decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) to establish a differential diagnosis model for PMN and non-PMN. Based on the true positive rate, true negative rate, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, accuracy, feature work area under the curve (AUC) of subjects, the best performance of the model was chosen.

Results: The efficiency of the Xgboost model based on the above evaluation indicators was the highest, which the diagnosis of PMN of the sensitivity and specificity, respectively 92% and 96%.

Conclusions: The differential diagnosis model for PMN was established successfully and the efficiency performance of the Xgboost model was the best. It could be used for the clinical diagnosis of PMN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renal Failure
Renal Failure 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Renal Failure primarily concentrates on acute renal injury and its consequence, but also addresses advances in the fields of chronic renal failure, hypertension, and renal transplantation. Bringing together both clinical and experimental aspects of renal failure, this publication presents timely, practical information on pathology and pathophysiology of acute renal failure; nephrotoxicity of drugs and other substances; prevention, treatment, and therapy of renal failure; renal failure in association with transplantation, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信