Jolie N Haun, Christine Melillo, Tali Schneider, Justin McDaniel, Julie McMahon-Grenz, Rachel C Benzinger, Risa Nakase-Richardson, Mary Jo V Pugh, Karen M Skop, Yvonne Friedman, Roberto Sandoval, Jerome Sabangan, Kimberly Samson, Linda M Picon, Jacob Kean
{"title":"为脑外伤强化评估和治疗项目开发实施研究逻辑模型的合作伙伴参与式方法。","authors":"Jolie N Haun, Christine Melillo, Tali Schneider, Justin McDaniel, Julie McMahon-Grenz, Rachel C Benzinger, Risa Nakase-Richardson, Mary Jo V Pugh, Karen M Skop, Yvonne Friedman, Roberto Sandoval, Jerome Sabangan, Kimberly Samson, Linda M Picon, Jacob Kean","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A partnered evaluation project with Veterans Health Administration Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program office uses a partner-engaged approach to characterize and evaluate the national implementation of traumatic brain injury (TBI)Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program (IETP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper illustrates a partner-engaged approach to contextualizing the IETP within an implementation research logic model (IRLM) to inform program sustainment and spread.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The project was conducted at five IETP sites: Tampa, Richmond, San Antonio, Palo Alto, and Minneapolis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Partners included national and site program leaders, clinicians, Department of Defense Referral Representatives, and researchers. Participants included program staff ( n = 46) and Service Members/Veterans ( n = 48).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This paper represents a component of a larger participatory-based concurrent mixed methods quality improvement project.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Participant scripts and demographic surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Datasets were analyzed using rapid iterative content analysis; IETP model was iteratively revised with partner feedback. Each site had an IETP clinical team member participate. The IRLM was contextualized within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); systematic consensus building expert reviewed implementation strategies; RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance); and Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses and partner feedback identified key characteristics, determinants, implementation strategies, mechanisms, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This partner-engaged IRLM informs implementation and sustainment of a rehabilitation program for individuals with TBI. Findings will be leveraged to examine implementation, standardize core outcome measurements, and inform knowledge translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"435-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Partner-Engaged Approach to Developing an Implementation Research Logic Model for a Traumatic Brain Injury-Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program.\",\"authors\":\"Jolie N Haun, Christine Melillo, Tali Schneider, Justin McDaniel, Julie McMahon-Grenz, Rachel C Benzinger, Risa Nakase-Richardson, Mary Jo V Pugh, Karen M Skop, Yvonne Friedman, Roberto Sandoval, Jerome Sabangan, Kimberly Samson, Linda M Picon, Jacob Kean\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A partnered evaluation project with Veterans Health Administration Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program office uses a partner-engaged approach to characterize and evaluate the national implementation of traumatic brain injury (TBI)Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program (IETP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper illustrates a partner-engaged approach to contextualizing the IETP within an implementation research logic model (IRLM) to inform program sustainment and spread.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The project was conducted at five IETP sites: Tampa, Richmond, San Antonio, Palo Alto, and Minneapolis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Partners included national and site program leaders, clinicians, Department of Defense Referral Representatives, and researchers. Participants included program staff ( n = 46) and Service Members/Veterans ( n = 48).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This paper represents a component of a larger participatory-based concurrent mixed methods quality improvement project.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Participant scripts and demographic surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Datasets were analyzed using rapid iterative content analysis; IETP model was iteratively revised with partner feedback. Each site had an IETP clinical team member participate. The IRLM was contextualized within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); systematic consensus building expert reviewed implementation strategies; RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance); and Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses and partner feedback identified key characteristics, determinants, implementation strategies, mechanisms, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This partner-engaged IRLM informs implementation and sustainment of a rehabilitation program for individuals with TBI. Findings will be leveraged to examine implementation, standardize core outcome measurements, and inform knowledge translation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"435-445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000988\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Partner-Engaged Approach to Developing an Implementation Research Logic Model for a Traumatic Brain Injury-Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program.
Background: A partnered evaluation project with Veterans Health Administration Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program office uses a partner-engaged approach to characterize and evaluate the national implementation of traumatic brain injury (TBI)Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program (IETP).
Objective: This paper illustrates a partner-engaged approach to contextualizing the IETP within an implementation research logic model (IRLM) to inform program sustainment and spread.
Setting: The project was conducted at five IETP sites: Tampa, Richmond, San Antonio, Palo Alto, and Minneapolis.
Participants: Partners included national and site program leaders, clinicians, Department of Defense Referral Representatives, and researchers. Participants included program staff ( n = 46) and Service Members/Veterans ( n = 48).
Design: This paper represents a component of a larger participatory-based concurrent mixed methods quality improvement project.
Main measures: Participant scripts and demographic surveys.
Methods: Datasets were analyzed using rapid iterative content analysis; IETP model was iteratively revised with partner feedback. Each site had an IETP clinical team member participate. The IRLM was contextualized within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); systematic consensus building expert reviewed implementation strategies; RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance); and Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF).
Results: Analyses and partner feedback identified key characteristics, determinants, implementation strategies, mechanisms, and outcomes.
Conclusions: This partner-engaged IRLM informs implementation and sustainment of a rehabilitation program for individuals with TBI. Findings will be leveraged to examine implementation, standardize core outcome measurements, and inform knowledge translation.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
