对炎症性风湿病患者因使用 TNF-α 抑制剂而产生的药物不良反应的纵向患者报告负担进行量化:一项前瞻性队列观察研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2383697
Benthe H König, Helen R Gosselt, Jette A van Lint, Leanne J Kosse, Bart J F van den Bemt, Peter M Ten Klooster, Harald E Vonkeman, Naomi T Jessurun
{"title":"对炎症性风湿病患者因使用 TNF-α 抑制剂而产生的药物不良反应的纵向患者报告负担进行量化:一项前瞻性队列观察研究。","authors":"Benthe H König, Helen R Gosselt, Jette A van Lint, Leanne J Kosse, Bart J F van den Bemt, Peter M Ten Klooster, Harald E Vonkeman, Naomi T Jessurun","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2383697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of knowledge on patient perspectives on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to the use of biologics. The aim of this study is to quantify the burden over time of ADRs attributed to TNF-α inhibitors in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) and investigate whether the burden over time differs between different types of ADRs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data were used from the Dutch Biologic Monitor (DBM), an observational prospective cohort study for patient-reported ADRs attributed to biologics. Patients with an IRD using a TNF-α inhibitor reporting an ADR, lasting for three consecutive questionnaires, were included. Questionnaires were sent every 2 months and the burden was scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Burden scores were analyzed using linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 166 unique patients reporting 274 ADRs were included. The burden score decreased every month by 0.29 points (95% CI -0.34 - -0.24) on average on a 5-point Likert-type scale. The burden score for infections and infestations decreased significantly faster than the burden score for injection site reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-reported burden of ADRs attributed to the use of a TNF-α inhibitor in patients with IRDs decreased significantly over time, especially for infections and infestations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"815-820"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of longitudinal patient-reported burden of adverse drug reactions attributed to the use of TNF-α inhibitors in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: an observational prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Benthe H König, Helen R Gosselt, Jette A van Lint, Leanne J Kosse, Bart J F van den Bemt, Peter M Ten Klooster, Harald E Vonkeman, Naomi T Jessurun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2383697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of knowledge on patient perspectives on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to the use of biologics. The aim of this study is to quantify the burden over time of ADRs attributed to TNF-α inhibitors in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) and investigate whether the burden over time differs between different types of ADRs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data were used from the Dutch Biologic Monitor (DBM), an observational prospective cohort study for patient-reported ADRs attributed to biologics. Patients with an IRD using a TNF-α inhibitor reporting an ADR, lasting for three consecutive questionnaires, were included. Questionnaires were sent every 2 months and the burden was scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Burden scores were analyzed using linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 166 unique patients reporting 274 ADRs were included. The burden score decreased every month by 0.29 points (95% CI -0.34 - -0.24) on average on a 5-point Likert-type scale. The burden score for infections and infestations decreased significantly faster than the burden score for injection site reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-reported burden of ADRs attributed to the use of a TNF-α inhibitor in patients with IRDs decreased significantly over time, especially for infections and infestations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"815-820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2383697\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2383697","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者对使用生物制剂引起的药物不良反应(ADRs)缺乏了解。本研究旨在量化炎症性风湿病(IRDs)患者因使用TNF-α抑制剂而引起的药物不良反应随时间推移而产生的负担,并调查不同类型的药物不良反应随时间推移而产生的负担是否有所不同:研究数据来自荷兰生物制品监测机构(DBM),该机构是一项观察性前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为患者报告的生物制品所致不良反应。研究纳入了使用 TNF-α 抑制剂的 IRD 患者,这些患者在连续三次问卷调查中均报告了 ADR。调查问卷每两个月发送一次,以 5 点李克特量表对负担进行评分。采用线性混合模型对负担得分进行分析:结果:共纳入了 166 名报告了 274 例 ADR 的患者的数据。按 5 点李克特量表计算,负担得分平均每月下降 0.29 分(95% CI -0.34 -0.24)。感染和侵袭负担得分的下降速度明显快于注射部位反应负担得分的下降速度:结论:随着时间的推移,IRD患者因使用TNF-α抑制剂而产生的ADR负担明显减轻,尤其是感染和侵袭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantification of longitudinal patient-reported burden of adverse drug reactions attributed to the use of TNF-α inhibitors in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: an observational prospective cohort study.

Background: There is a lack of knowledge on patient perspectives on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to the use of biologics. The aim of this study is to quantify the burden over time of ADRs attributed to TNF-α inhibitors in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) and investigate whether the burden over time differs between different types of ADRs.

Research design and methods: Data were used from the Dutch Biologic Monitor (DBM), an observational prospective cohort study for patient-reported ADRs attributed to biologics. Patients with an IRD using a TNF-α inhibitor reporting an ADR, lasting for three consecutive questionnaires, were included. Questionnaires were sent every 2 months and the burden was scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Burden scores were analyzed using linear mixed models.

Results: Data from 166 unique patients reporting 274 ADRs were included. The burden score decreased every month by 0.29 points (95% CI -0.34 - -0.24) on average on a 5-point Likert-type scale. The burden score for infections and infestations decreased significantly faster than the burden score for injection site reactions.

Conclusions: Patient-reported burden of ADRs attributed to the use of a TNF-α inhibitor in patients with IRDs decreased significantly over time, especially for infections and infestations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信