从心房颤动消融试验中获得的机制启示:为未来指明方向。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jeffrey J Goldberger, Raul D Mitrani, Ghaith Zaatari, Sanjiv M Narayan
{"title":"从心房颤动消融试验中获得的机制启示:为未来指明方向。","authors":"Jeffrey J Goldberger, Raul D Mitrani, Ghaith Zaatari, Sanjiv M Narayan","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Success rates for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly persistent AF, remain suboptimal. Pulmonary vein isolation has been the cornerstone for catheter ablation of AF for over a decade. While successful for most patients, pulmonary vein isolation alone is still insufficient for a substantial minority. Frustratingly, multiple clinical trials testing a diverse array of additional ablation approaches have led to mixed results, with no current strategy that improves AF outcomes beyond pulmonary vein isolation in all patients. Nevertheless, this large collection of data could be used to extract important insights regarding AF mechanisms and the diversity of the AF syndrome. Mechanistically, the general model for arrhythmogenesis prompts the need for tools to individually assess triggers, drivers, and substrates in individual patients. A key goal is to identify those who will not respond to pulmonary vein isolation, with novel approaches to phenotyping that may include mapping to identify alternative drivers or critical substrates. This, in turn, can allow for the implementation of phenotype-based, targeted approaches that may categorize patients into groups who would or would not be likely to respond to catheter ablation, pharmacological therapy, and risk factor modification programs. One major goal is to predict individuals in whom additional empirical ablation, while feasible, may be futile or lead to atrial scarring or proarrhythmia. This work attempts to integrate key lessons from successful and failed trials of catheter ablation, as well as models of AF, to suggest future paradigms for AF treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e012939"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic Insights From Trials of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Charting a Course for the Future.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey J Goldberger, Raul D Mitrani, Ghaith Zaatari, Sanjiv M Narayan\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Success rates for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly persistent AF, remain suboptimal. Pulmonary vein isolation has been the cornerstone for catheter ablation of AF for over a decade. While successful for most patients, pulmonary vein isolation alone is still insufficient for a substantial minority. Frustratingly, multiple clinical trials testing a diverse array of additional ablation approaches have led to mixed results, with no current strategy that improves AF outcomes beyond pulmonary vein isolation in all patients. Nevertheless, this large collection of data could be used to extract important insights regarding AF mechanisms and the diversity of the AF syndrome. Mechanistically, the general model for arrhythmogenesis prompts the need for tools to individually assess triggers, drivers, and substrates in individual patients. A key goal is to identify those who will not respond to pulmonary vein isolation, with novel approaches to phenotyping that may include mapping to identify alternative drivers or critical substrates. This, in turn, can allow for the implementation of phenotype-based, targeted approaches that may categorize patients into groups who would or would not be likely to respond to catheter ablation, pharmacological therapy, and risk factor modification programs. One major goal is to predict individuals in whom additional empirical ablation, while feasible, may be futile or lead to atrial scarring or proarrhythmia. This work attempts to integrate key lessons from successful and failed trials of catheter ablation, as well as models of AF, to suggest future paradigms for AF treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e012939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012939\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012939","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心房颤动(房颤),尤其是持续性房颤的导管消融成功率仍不理想。十多年来,肺静脉隔离一直是导管消融房颤的基石。虽然对大多数患者来说肺静脉隔离是成功的,但对相当一部分患者来说,仅靠肺静脉隔离仍然是不够的。令人沮丧的是,多项临床试验测试了多种额外的消融方法,但结果喜忧参半,目前还没有一种策略能在肺静脉隔离之外改善所有患者的房颤预后。尽管如此,我们仍可利用收集到的大量数据,对房颤机制和房颤综合征的多样性提出重要见解。从机制上讲,心律失常发生的一般模型促使人们需要一些工具来单独评估个别患者的触发因素、驱动因素和基质。一个关键目标是识别那些对肺静脉隔离无效的患者,采用新方法进行表型分析,其中可能包括制图以识别替代驱动因素或关键底物。这反过来又可以实施以表型为基础的、有针对性的方法,将患者分为可能对导管消融、药物治疗和风险因素调整计划有反应或无反应的群体。其中一个主要目标是预测哪些患者虽然可以进行额外的经验性消融,但可能会徒劳无功或导致心房瘢痕或原心律失常。这项研究试图综合导管消融成功和失败试验的主要经验以及房颤模型,为未来的房颤治疗模式提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanistic Insights From Trials of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Charting a Course for the Future.

Success rates for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly persistent AF, remain suboptimal. Pulmonary vein isolation has been the cornerstone for catheter ablation of AF for over a decade. While successful for most patients, pulmonary vein isolation alone is still insufficient for a substantial minority. Frustratingly, multiple clinical trials testing a diverse array of additional ablation approaches have led to mixed results, with no current strategy that improves AF outcomes beyond pulmonary vein isolation in all patients. Nevertheless, this large collection of data could be used to extract important insights regarding AF mechanisms and the diversity of the AF syndrome. Mechanistically, the general model for arrhythmogenesis prompts the need for tools to individually assess triggers, drivers, and substrates in individual patients. A key goal is to identify those who will not respond to pulmonary vein isolation, with novel approaches to phenotyping that may include mapping to identify alternative drivers or critical substrates. This, in turn, can allow for the implementation of phenotype-based, targeted approaches that may categorize patients into groups who would or would not be likely to respond to catheter ablation, pharmacological therapy, and risk factor modification programs. One major goal is to predict individuals in whom additional empirical ablation, while feasible, may be futile or lead to atrial scarring or proarrhythmia. This work attempts to integrate key lessons from successful and failed trials of catheter ablation, as well as models of AF, to suggest future paradigms for AF treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信