侵袭性和非侵袭性皮肤基底细胞癌(BCC)的放射敏感性和疗效:对 7994 例 BCC 病变的分析显示,图像引导表层放射治疗对硬化性、浸润性、变形性和微小结节性 BCC 亚型以及非高危 BCC 均能实现较高的局部控制率。

Lio Yu, Michael Kaczmarski, Clay Cockerell
{"title":"侵袭性和非侵袭性皮肤基底细胞癌(BCC)的放射敏感性和疗效:对 7994 例 BCC 病变的分析显示,图像引导表层放射治疗对硬化性、浸润性、变形性和微小结节性 BCC 亚型以及非高危 BCC 均能实现较高的局部控制率。","authors":"Lio Yu, Michael Kaczmarski, Clay Cockerell","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.17.24310584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background High risk (HR) basal cell carcinoma (BCC) subtypes have been associated with high recurrence rates that is felt to be better managed surgically. Specifically, Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is considered most effective for aggressive HR BCCs and superior to traditional nonsurgical techniques, including radiation. Recently, superficial radiation therapy with high resolution ultrasound image guidance called Image Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy (IGSRT) displayed high local control (LC) rates and is an emerging non-surgical alternative to MMS for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Objectives We present the largest experience in the USA on treatment of BCCs using IGSRT and specifically evaluate if there are differences in LC between HR BCC versus non-HR subtypes using this technology. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 7,994 BCC lesions treated with IGSRT in the continental United States. We compared the results of BCCs treated with IGSRT separated by HR vs non HR groups including 339 HR BCC lesions and 7655 non HR BCC lesions. High risk was defined as infiltrative, micronodular, morpheaform, and sclerosing subtypes. Non-HR BCC included superficial, nodular, and not otherwise specified (NOS) subtypes. Local control (LC) rates at two and five years were calculated with actuarial life-table and Kaplan-Meier methods and statistically compared using log rank tests. Results IGSRT treatment of the HR BCC group showed no recurrences with two and five-year actuarial and KM LC rates all at 100%. In comparison, the non-HR BCC cohort achieved similar two and five-year actuarial LC rates of 99.71% and 99.24% (KM LC at 99.5% and 99.23%), respectively. No statistical differences in LC rates between the two cohorts (p=0.278 each) resulted. Patients tolerated treatment well with little or rare high grade RTOG toxicity reported in both cohorts. Conclusion HR BCC may be treated just as effectively as low risk BCC using IGSRT and presents a viable alternative to MMS. The targeted approach using IGSRT, incorporating high resolution dermal ultrasound (HRDUS), appear to enhance treatment accuracy and effectiveness demonstrating high LC rates in all subtypes of BCC comparable to MMS and is a viable non-surgical option.","PeriodicalId":501385,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Dermatology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation sensitivity and efficacy in aggressive and non-aggressive basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the skin: Image Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy achieves high rate of local control in sclerosing, infiltrative, morpheaform and micronodular BCC subtypes as well as in non high risk BCCs, an analysis of 7994 BCC lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Lio Yu, Michael Kaczmarski, Clay Cockerell\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.17.24310584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background High risk (HR) basal cell carcinoma (BCC) subtypes have been associated with high recurrence rates that is felt to be better managed surgically. Specifically, Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is considered most effective for aggressive HR BCCs and superior to traditional nonsurgical techniques, including radiation. Recently, superficial radiation therapy with high resolution ultrasound image guidance called Image Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy (IGSRT) displayed high local control (LC) rates and is an emerging non-surgical alternative to MMS for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Objectives We present the largest experience in the USA on treatment of BCCs using IGSRT and specifically evaluate if there are differences in LC between HR BCC versus non-HR subtypes using this technology. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 7,994 BCC lesions treated with IGSRT in the continental United States. We compared the results of BCCs treated with IGSRT separated by HR vs non HR groups including 339 HR BCC lesions and 7655 non HR BCC lesions. High risk was defined as infiltrative, micronodular, morpheaform, and sclerosing subtypes. Non-HR BCC included superficial, nodular, and not otherwise specified (NOS) subtypes. Local control (LC) rates at two and five years were calculated with actuarial life-table and Kaplan-Meier methods and statistically compared using log rank tests. Results IGSRT treatment of the HR BCC group showed no recurrences with two and five-year actuarial and KM LC rates all at 100%. In comparison, the non-HR BCC cohort achieved similar two and five-year actuarial LC rates of 99.71% and 99.24% (KM LC at 99.5% and 99.23%), respectively. No statistical differences in LC rates between the two cohorts (p=0.278 each) resulted. Patients tolerated treatment well with little or rare high grade RTOG toxicity reported in both cohorts. Conclusion HR BCC may be treated just as effectively as low risk BCC using IGSRT and presents a viable alternative to MMS. The targeted approach using IGSRT, incorporating high resolution dermal ultrasound (HRDUS), appear to enhance treatment accuracy and effectiveness demonstrating high LC rates in all subtypes of BCC comparable to MMS and is a viable non-surgical option.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.17.24310584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.17.24310584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 高危(HR)基底细胞癌(BCC)亚型与高复发率有关,人们认为手术治疗效果更好。具体而言,莫氏显微放射手术(MMS)被认为对侵袭性高危基底细胞癌最有效,优于传统的非手术治疗技术,包括放射治疗。最近,在高分辨率超声图像引导下进行的表层放射治疗(称为图像引导表层放射治疗(IGSRT))显示出很高的局部控制率(LC),成为非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)莫氏显微放射治疗的新兴非手术替代方法。目的 我们介绍了美国使用 IGSRT 治疗 BCC 的最大规模经验,并特别评估了使用该技术治疗 HR BCC 与非 HR 亚型的 LC 是否存在差异。方法 我们对美国大陆采用 IGSRT 治疗的 7994 例 BCC 病变进行了回顾性分析。我们比较了接受 IGSRT 治疗的 BCC 的结果,将其分为高危与非高危两组,包括 339 例高危 BCC 病变和 7655 例非高危 BCC 病变。高危定义为浸润型、微小结节型、病变型和硬化亚型。非高风险 BCC 包括浅表性、结节性和非特殊(NOS)亚型。采用精算生命表法和 Kaplan-Meier 法计算两年和五年的局部控制(LC)率,并采用对数秩检验进行统计比较。结果 HR BCC 组的 IGSRT 治疗无复发,两年和五年的精算 LC 率和 KM LC 率均为 100%。相比之下,非 HR BCC 组的两年和五年精算 LC 率分别为 99.71% 和 99.24%(KM LC 率分别为 99.5% 和 99.23%)。两组患者的 LC 率无统计学差异(P=0.278)。患者对治疗的耐受性良好,两组患者均报告了极少或罕见的 RTOG 高毒性。结论 使用 IGSRT 治疗高危 BCC 与低危 BCC 一样有效,是 MMS 的可行替代方案。使用 IGSRT 的靶向方法结合高分辨率真皮超声 (HRDUS) 似乎提高了治疗的准确性和有效性,在所有 BCC 亚型中均显示出与 MMS 相当的高 LC 率,是一种可行的非手术疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiation sensitivity and efficacy in aggressive and non-aggressive basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the skin: Image Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy achieves high rate of local control in sclerosing, infiltrative, morpheaform and micronodular BCC subtypes as well as in non high risk BCCs, an analysis of 7994 BCC lesions.
Background High risk (HR) basal cell carcinoma (BCC) subtypes have been associated with high recurrence rates that is felt to be better managed surgically. Specifically, Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is considered most effective for aggressive HR BCCs and superior to traditional nonsurgical techniques, including radiation. Recently, superficial radiation therapy with high resolution ultrasound image guidance called Image Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy (IGSRT) displayed high local control (LC) rates and is an emerging non-surgical alternative to MMS for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Objectives We present the largest experience in the USA on treatment of BCCs using IGSRT and specifically evaluate if there are differences in LC between HR BCC versus non-HR subtypes using this technology. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 7,994 BCC lesions treated with IGSRT in the continental United States. We compared the results of BCCs treated with IGSRT separated by HR vs non HR groups including 339 HR BCC lesions and 7655 non HR BCC lesions. High risk was defined as infiltrative, micronodular, morpheaform, and sclerosing subtypes. Non-HR BCC included superficial, nodular, and not otherwise specified (NOS) subtypes. Local control (LC) rates at two and five years were calculated with actuarial life-table and Kaplan-Meier methods and statistically compared using log rank tests. Results IGSRT treatment of the HR BCC group showed no recurrences with two and five-year actuarial and KM LC rates all at 100%. In comparison, the non-HR BCC cohort achieved similar two and five-year actuarial LC rates of 99.71% and 99.24% (KM LC at 99.5% and 99.23%), respectively. No statistical differences in LC rates between the two cohorts (p=0.278 each) resulted. Patients tolerated treatment well with little or rare high grade RTOG toxicity reported in both cohorts. Conclusion HR BCC may be treated just as effectively as low risk BCC using IGSRT and presents a viable alternative to MMS. The targeted approach using IGSRT, incorporating high resolution dermal ultrasound (HRDUS), appear to enhance treatment accuracy and effectiveness demonstrating high LC rates in all subtypes of BCC comparable to MMS and is a viable non-surgical option.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信