不完全跳跃市场中的二次对冲深度学习

Nacira Agram, Bernt Øksendal, Jan Rems
{"title":"不完全跳跃市场中的二次对冲深度学习","authors":"Nacira Agram, Bernt Øksendal, Jan Rems","doi":"arxiv-2407.13688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and\nhedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based upon a\nrigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio,\noptimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure\nthrough the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm\nbased on the combination of the feedforward and LSTM neural networks is tested\non three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the\ncomplete market Black-Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm's\nperformance. The results that indicate the algorithm's good performance are\npresented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model\nstudied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on\nthe minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a\ndifferent pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal\nvariance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced\nfrom the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle\nleads to lower losses than the Merton principle.","PeriodicalId":501478,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Trading and Market Microstructure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market\",\"authors\":\"Nacira Agram, Bernt Øksendal, Jan Rems\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.13688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and\\nhedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based upon a\\nrigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio,\\noptimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure\\nthrough the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm\\nbased on the combination of the feedforward and LSTM neural networks is tested\\non three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the\\ncomplete market Black-Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm's\\nperformance. The results that indicate the algorithm's good performance are\\npresented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model\\nstudied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on\\nthe minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a\\ndifferent pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal\\nvariance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced\\nfrom the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle\\nleads to lower losses than the Merton principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Trading and Market Microstructure\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Trading and Market Microstructure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.13688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Trading and Market Microstructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.13688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一种深度学习方法来研究不完全跳跃扩散市场中的最小方差定价和对冲问题。它基于严格的随机微积分推导出最优对冲组合、最优期权价格,以及通过斯塔克尔伯格博弈方法推导出的相应等效马丁格尔度量。基于前馈和 LSTM 神经网络组合的深度学习算法在三个不同的市场模型上进行了测试,其中两个模型是不完全的。相比之下,完整市场的布莱克-斯科尔斯(Black-Scholes)模型是该算法性能的基准。本文介绍并讨论了表明该算法性能良好的结果。特别是,我们将结果应用于默顿研究的特殊不完全市场模型,并详细比较了我们基于最小方差原则得出的结果和默顿基于不同定价原则得出的结果。通过深度学习,我们发现最小方差原理得出的期权价格通常高于默顿原理得出的价格。另一方面,最小方差原则导致的损失低于默顿原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market
We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based upon a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feedforward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black-Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm's performance. The results that indicate the algorithm's good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信