{"title":"维莱姆-弗卢瑟的 \"异性伦理学 \"之蜿蜒曲折","authors":"Wanderley Dias da Silva","doi":"10.1007/s11841-024-01033-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article considers the central place the ideas of transcension and affective responsibility play in the thought of the Czech-Brazilian philosopher Vilém Flusser. From this, it outlines some of the intricacies of what can be termed a typically Flusserian ethics of alterity. In the process, it will be revealed that all of this leads Flusser curiously back to Hegel. The return to Hegel indicates, among other things, that any attempt to philosophize about the experience of otherness seems always to give the Swabian philosopher the last word.</p>","PeriodicalId":44736,"journal":{"name":"Sophia","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meanders of Vilém Flusser’s Ethics of Alterity\",\"authors\":\"Wanderley Dias da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11841-024-01033-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The article considers the central place the ideas of transcension and affective responsibility play in the thought of the Czech-Brazilian philosopher Vilém Flusser. From this, it outlines some of the intricacies of what can be termed a typically Flusserian ethics of alterity. In the process, it will be revealed that all of this leads Flusser curiously back to Hegel. The return to Hegel indicates, among other things, that any attempt to philosophize about the experience of otherness seems always to give the Swabian philosopher the last word.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sophia\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sophia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-024-01033-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-024-01033-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The article considers the central place the ideas of transcension and affective responsibility play in the thought of the Czech-Brazilian philosopher Vilém Flusser. From this, it outlines some of the intricacies of what can be termed a typically Flusserian ethics of alterity. In the process, it will be revealed that all of this leads Flusser curiously back to Hegel. The return to Hegel indicates, among other things, that any attempt to philosophize about the experience of otherness seems always to give the Swabian philosopher the last word.
期刊介绍:
Sophia is now published by Springer. The back files, all the way to Volume 1:1, are available via SpringerLink! Covers both analytic and continental philosophy of religionConsiders both western and non-western perspectives, including Asian and indigenousIncludes specialist contributions, e.g. on feminist and postcolonial philosophy of religionSince its inception in 1962, Sophia has been devoted to providing a forum for discussions in philosophy and religion, focusing on the interstices between metaphysics and theological thinking. The discussions take cognizance of the wider ambience of the sciences (''natural'' philosophy and human/social sciences), ethical and moral concerns in the public sphere, critical feminist theology and cross-cultural perspectives. Sophia''s cross-cultural and cross-frontier approach is reflected not only in the international composition of its editorial board, but also in its consideration of analytic, continental, Asian and indigenous responses to issues and developments in the field of philosophy of religion.