在西班牙西部,农场管理方法和宿主物种丰富度与结核病阳性农场的较高可能性有关

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Gloria Herrero-García, Rita Vaz-Rodrigues, Pilar Pozo, Patricia Barroso, David Relimpio, Jesús Nácar, Anna Grau, Olga Mínguez, Alberto García-Rodríguez, Ana Balseiro, Christian Gortázar
{"title":"在西班牙西部,农场管理方法和宿主物种丰富度与结核病阳性农场的较高可能性有关","authors":"Gloria Herrero-García, Rita Vaz-Rodrigues, Pilar Pozo, Patricia Barroso, David Relimpio, Jesús Nácar, Anna Grau, Olga Mínguez, Alberto García-Rodríguez, Ana Balseiro, Christian Gortázar","doi":"10.1007/s10344-024-01833-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite enormous efforts, complete animal tuberculosis (TB) eradication has only been achieved in few regions. Epidemiological analyses are key to identify TB risk factors and set up targeted biosecurity measures. Here, we conducted an in-depth characterization of 84 extensive beef cattle farms from a high TB prevalence region in Western Spain, and assessed how farm management and wildlife presence on farms contribute to cattle TB risk. Twenty-six out of 84 variables were associated with cattle farm TB positivity. Farm management variables associated with TB positivity included older cattle, larger herd size, highly fragmented farm structure and greater connectivity between farms. TB-positive farms provided supplemental feed over a higher number of months, used calf feeders, and had higher number of waterholes. Detecting Eurasian wild boar (<i>Sus scrofa</i>), red fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>), European badger (<i>Meles meles</i>), roe deer (<i>Capreolus capreolus</i>), or Egyptian mongoose (<i>Herpestes ichneumon</i>) on cattle farms was also associated with farm TB positivity. The best ordinal regression model indicated that in farms with a large herd size (&gt; 167 animals) the odds of being positive or recurrently positive (versus negative) was 7.34 (95% CI = 2.43–23.51) times higher that of farms with small herd size. Further, for every additional host species detected in the farm premises, the odds of being TB-positive increased 56%. We conclude that both cattle management and wildlife need to be targeted for successful TB control in grazing-based farming systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":51044,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farm management practices and host species richness associated with higher likelihood of tuberculosis positive farms in Western Spain\",\"authors\":\"Gloria Herrero-García, Rita Vaz-Rodrigues, Pilar Pozo, Patricia Barroso, David Relimpio, Jesús Nácar, Anna Grau, Olga Mínguez, Alberto García-Rodríguez, Ana Balseiro, Christian Gortázar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10344-024-01833-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite enormous efforts, complete animal tuberculosis (TB) eradication has only been achieved in few regions. Epidemiological analyses are key to identify TB risk factors and set up targeted biosecurity measures. Here, we conducted an in-depth characterization of 84 extensive beef cattle farms from a high TB prevalence region in Western Spain, and assessed how farm management and wildlife presence on farms contribute to cattle TB risk. Twenty-six out of 84 variables were associated with cattle farm TB positivity. Farm management variables associated with TB positivity included older cattle, larger herd size, highly fragmented farm structure and greater connectivity between farms. TB-positive farms provided supplemental feed over a higher number of months, used calf feeders, and had higher number of waterholes. Detecting Eurasian wild boar (<i>Sus scrofa</i>), red fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>), European badger (<i>Meles meles</i>), roe deer (<i>Capreolus capreolus</i>), or Egyptian mongoose (<i>Herpestes ichneumon</i>) on cattle farms was also associated with farm TB positivity. The best ordinal regression model indicated that in farms with a large herd size (&gt; 167 animals) the odds of being positive or recurrently positive (versus negative) was 7.34 (95% CI = 2.43–23.51) times higher that of farms with small herd size. Further, for every additional host species detected in the farm premises, the odds of being TB-positive increased 56%. We conclude that both cattle management and wildlife need to be targeted for successful TB control in grazing-based farming systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Wildlife Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Wildlife Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01833-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01833-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管付出了巨大努力,但只有少数地区实现了彻底根除动物结核病(TB)的目标。流行病学分析是确定结核病风险因素和制定有针对性的生物安全措施的关键。在此,我们对西班牙西部结核病高发地区的 84 个大规模肉牛养殖场进行了深入分析,并评估了养殖场管理和野生动物的存在如何导致牛结核病风险。84 个变量中有 26 个与牛场结核病阳性相关。与结核阳性相关的农场管理变量包括牛龄较大、牛群规模较大、农场结构高度分散以及农场之间的连接性较强。结核阳性牛场提供补充饲料的月数、使用犊牛饲喂器和水坑数量较多。在养牛场发现欧亚野猪(Sus scrofa)、赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)、欧洲獾(Meles meles)、狍子(Capreolus capreolus)或埃及獴(Herpestes ichneumon)也与农场结核病阳性相关。最佳序数回归模型显示,牛群规模大(167 头)的农场,结核病阳性或反复阳性(相对于阴性)的几率是牛群规模小农场的 7.34 倍(95% CI = 2.43-23.51)。此外,农场内每多发现一种宿主物种,结核病阳性的几率就会增加 56%。我们的结论是,在以放牧为主的农业系统中,要想成功控制结核病,就必须同时以牛群管理和野生动物为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Farm management practices and host species richness associated with higher likelihood of tuberculosis positive farms in Western Spain

Farm management practices and host species richness associated with higher likelihood of tuberculosis positive farms in Western Spain

Despite enormous efforts, complete animal tuberculosis (TB) eradication has only been achieved in few regions. Epidemiological analyses are key to identify TB risk factors and set up targeted biosecurity measures. Here, we conducted an in-depth characterization of 84 extensive beef cattle farms from a high TB prevalence region in Western Spain, and assessed how farm management and wildlife presence on farms contribute to cattle TB risk. Twenty-six out of 84 variables were associated with cattle farm TB positivity. Farm management variables associated with TB positivity included older cattle, larger herd size, highly fragmented farm structure and greater connectivity between farms. TB-positive farms provided supplemental feed over a higher number of months, used calf feeders, and had higher number of waterholes. Detecting Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), European badger (Meles meles), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), or Egyptian mongoose (Herpestes ichneumon) on cattle farms was also associated with farm TB positivity. The best ordinal regression model indicated that in farms with a large herd size (> 167 animals) the odds of being positive or recurrently positive (versus negative) was 7.34 (95% CI = 2.43–23.51) times higher that of farms with small herd size. Further, for every additional host species detected in the farm premises, the odds of being TB-positive increased 56%. We conclude that both cattle management and wildlife need to be targeted for successful TB control in grazing-based farming systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wildlife Research focuses on all aspects of wildlife biology. Main areas are: applied wildlife ecology; diseases affecting wildlife population dynamics, conservation, economy or public health; ecotoxicology; management for conservation, hunting or pest control; population genetics; and the sustainable use of wildlife as a natural resource. Contributions to socio-cultural aspects of human-wildlife relationships and to the history and sociology of hunting will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信