单焦点定界法揭示了被低估的 Thomasomys(啮齿目,鼬科)物种多样性

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Dennisse Ruelas, Víctor Pacheco, José Pérez, Juan Diaz‐Nieto, Pierre‐Henri Fabre
{"title":"单焦点定界法揭示了被低估的 Thomasomys(啮齿目,鼬科)物种多样性","authors":"Dennisse Ruelas, Víctor Pacheco, José Pérez, Juan Diaz‐Nieto, Pierre‐Henri Fabre","doi":"10.1111/zsc.12680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic> is the most diverse genus of the Sigmodontinae subfamily, comprising at least 51 species. Despite recent systematic advances, the monophyly of this genus, the proposed species groups and their content, and the species limits are not yet firmly established. Using a well‐sampled mitochondrial dataset, we aim to test the monophyly of the genus, infer phylogenetic relationships among species and species groups and test the limits between valid species and candidate species. For this, we used a large matrix of 272 partial non‐redundant sequences of the cytochrome b mitochondrial gene from 40 valid and 20 candidate species. Using probabilistic approaches on this dataset, we inferred <jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic> phylogenetic relationships and explored species boundaries using four unilocus species delimitation methods (ABGD, ASAP, bPTP and GMYC). <jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic> sensu stricto was recovered monophyletic and well‐supported, excluding a Peruvian lineage misidentified as part of the genus. Analyses consistently recovered 10 well‐supported major clades and several paraphyletic or polyphyletic species. Delimitation methods and genetic divergences estimated that <jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic> comprises between 81 and 93 putative species, thus potentially doubling the species diversity of <jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic>. Such a result clearly calls for an urgent taxonomic revision of this genus and the use of further molecular loci within an integrative taxonomic approach to describe its diversity and understand its evolutionary history.","PeriodicalId":49334,"journal":{"name":"Zoologica Scripta","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilocus delimitation methods reveal the underestimated species diversity of Thomasomys (Rodentia, Cricetidae)\",\"authors\":\"Dennisse Ruelas, Víctor Pacheco, José Pérez, Juan Diaz‐Nieto, Pierre‐Henri Fabre\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/zsc.12680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic> is the most diverse genus of the Sigmodontinae subfamily, comprising at least 51 species. Despite recent systematic advances, the monophyly of this genus, the proposed species groups and their content, and the species limits are not yet firmly established. Using a well‐sampled mitochondrial dataset, we aim to test the monophyly of the genus, infer phylogenetic relationships among species and species groups and test the limits between valid species and candidate species. For this, we used a large matrix of 272 partial non‐redundant sequences of the cytochrome b mitochondrial gene from 40 valid and 20 candidate species. Using probabilistic approaches on this dataset, we inferred <jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic> phylogenetic relationships and explored species boundaries using four unilocus species delimitation methods (ABGD, ASAP, bPTP and GMYC). <jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic> sensu stricto was recovered monophyletic and well‐supported, excluding a Peruvian lineage misidentified as part of the genus. Analyses consistently recovered 10 well‐supported major clades and several paraphyletic or polyphyletic species. Delimitation methods and genetic divergences estimated that <jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic> comprises between 81 and 93 putative species, thus potentially doubling the species diversity of <jats:italic>Thomasomys</jats:italic>. Such a result clearly calls for an urgent taxonomic revision of this genus and the use of further molecular loci within an integrative taxonomic approach to describe its diversity and understand its evolutionary history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoologica Scripta\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoologica Scripta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12680\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoologica Scripta","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Thomasomys是Sigmodontinae亚科中种类最多的属,至少有51个种。尽管最近在系统学方面取得了进展,但该属的单系、拟议的物种组及其内容以及物种界限尚未得到牢固确立。利用取样良好的线粒体数据集,我们旨在检验该属的单系性,推断物种和物种组之间的系统发育关系,并检验有效物种和候选物种之间的界限。为此,我们使用了由来自 40 个有效物种和 20 个候选物种的 272 个细胞色素 b 线粒体基因部分非冗余序列组成的大型矩阵。在该数据集上使用概率方法,我们推断了托马索米斯的系统发生关系,并使用四种单焦点物种划分方法(ABGD、ASAP、bPTP 和 GMYC)探索了物种边界。严格意义上的 Thomasomys 被恢复为单系且支持良好,排除了一个被误认为是该属一部分的秘鲁系。分析一致发现了 10 个支持良好的主要支系和几个旁系或多系物种。据划界方法和遗传差异估计,托马索米斯包括 81 至 93 个假定物种,因此托马索米斯的物种多样性可能会增加一倍。这样的结果显然要求对该属进行紧急的分类学修订,并在综合分类学方法中使用更多的分子位点来描述其多样性和了解其进化历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unilocus delimitation methods reveal the underestimated species diversity of Thomasomys (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Thomasomys is the most diverse genus of the Sigmodontinae subfamily, comprising at least 51 species. Despite recent systematic advances, the monophyly of this genus, the proposed species groups and their content, and the species limits are not yet firmly established. Using a well‐sampled mitochondrial dataset, we aim to test the monophyly of the genus, infer phylogenetic relationships among species and species groups and test the limits between valid species and candidate species. For this, we used a large matrix of 272 partial non‐redundant sequences of the cytochrome b mitochondrial gene from 40 valid and 20 candidate species. Using probabilistic approaches on this dataset, we inferred Thomasomys phylogenetic relationships and explored species boundaries using four unilocus species delimitation methods (ABGD, ASAP, bPTP and GMYC). Thomasomys sensu stricto was recovered monophyletic and well‐supported, excluding a Peruvian lineage misidentified as part of the genus. Analyses consistently recovered 10 well‐supported major clades and several paraphyletic or polyphyletic species. Delimitation methods and genetic divergences estimated that Thomasomys comprises between 81 and 93 putative species, thus potentially doubling the species diversity of Thomasomys. Such a result clearly calls for an urgent taxonomic revision of this genus and the use of further molecular loci within an integrative taxonomic approach to describe its diversity and understand its evolutionary history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zoologica Scripta
Zoologica Scripta 生物-动物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoologica Scripta publishes papers in animal systematics and phylogeny, i.e. studies of evolutionary relationships among taxa, and the origin and evolution of biological diversity. Papers can also deal with ecological interactions and geographic distributions (phylogeography) if the results are placed in a wider phylogenetic/systematic/evolutionary context. Zoologica Scripta encourages papers on the development of methods for all aspects of phylogenetic inference and biological nomenclature/classification. Articles published in Zoologica Scripta must be original and present either theoretical or empirical studies of interest to a broad audience in systematics and phylogeny. Purely taxonomic papers, like species descriptions without being placed in a wider systematic/phylogenetic context, will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信