凝聚力、意识形态和宽容

Patrick Allmis
{"title":"凝聚力、意识形态和宽容","authors":"Patrick Allmis","doi":"arxiv-2407.14045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agents with different ideologies often form alliances to achieve their goals.\nParadoxically, ideologically similar agents are often opponents. In this paper,\nideologically heterogeneous agents choose the ideological composition of their\nneighborhood, their tolerance, and invest into connections. The resulting\nweighted network describes allies, opponents, and strengths. Disputes with\nopponents determine benefits, which increase in an agent's strength and\ncohesion. Cohesive agents have fewer mutual allies with opponents. In\nequilibrium, the network is segregated when cohesion is effective enough and\nsome agents tolerate ideologically distant types to oppose closer ones.\nSubsidizing connections dampens polarization in societies on the verge of\nsegregation.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cohesion, Ideology, and Tolerance\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Allmis\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.14045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Agents with different ideologies often form alliances to achieve their goals.\\nParadoxically, ideologically similar agents are often opponents. In this paper,\\nideologically heterogeneous agents choose the ideological composition of their\\nneighborhood, their tolerance, and invest into connections. The resulting\\nweighted network describes allies, opponents, and strengths. Disputes with\\nopponents determine benefits, which increase in an agent's strength and\\ncohesion. Cohesive agents have fewer mutual allies with opponents. In\\nequilibrium, the network is segregated when cohesion is effective enough and\\nsome agents tolerate ideologically distant types to oppose closer ones.\\nSubsidizing connections dampens polarization in societies on the verge of\\nsegregation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.14045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.14045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意识形态不同的代理人往往会结成联盟来实现他们的目标。矛盾的是,意识形态相似的代理人往往是对手。在本文中,意识形态异质的代理人会选择其邻居的意识形态构成、容忍度,并投资于联系。由此产生的加权网络描述了盟友、对手和优势。与对手的争端决定了利益,而利益会随着代理人的实力和凝聚力而增加。具有凝聚力的代理与对手之间的相互盟友数量较少。在非均衡状态下,当凝聚力足够有效时,网络就会出现隔离,一些代理人会容忍意识形态上距离较远的类型来反对距离较近的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cohesion, Ideology, and Tolerance
Agents with different ideologies often form alliances to achieve their goals. Paradoxically, ideologically similar agents are often opponents. In this paper, ideologically heterogeneous agents choose the ideological composition of their neighborhood, their tolerance, and invest into connections. The resulting weighted network describes allies, opponents, and strengths. Disputes with opponents determine benefits, which increase in an agent's strength and cohesion. Cohesive agents have fewer mutual allies with opponents. In equilibrium, the network is segregated when cohesion is effective enough and some agents tolerate ideologically distant types to oppose closer ones. Subsidizing connections dampens polarization in societies on the verge of segregation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信