{"title":"凝聚力、意识形态和宽容","authors":"Patrick Allmis","doi":"arxiv-2407.14045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agents with different ideologies often form alliances to achieve their goals.\nParadoxically, ideologically similar agents are often opponents. In this paper,\nideologically heterogeneous agents choose the ideological composition of their\nneighborhood, their tolerance, and invest into connections. The resulting\nweighted network describes allies, opponents, and strengths. Disputes with\nopponents determine benefits, which increase in an agent's strength and\ncohesion. Cohesive agents have fewer mutual allies with opponents. In\nequilibrium, the network is segregated when cohesion is effective enough and\nsome agents tolerate ideologically distant types to oppose closer ones.\nSubsidizing connections dampens polarization in societies on the verge of\nsegregation.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cohesion, Ideology, and Tolerance\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Allmis\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.14045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Agents with different ideologies often form alliances to achieve their goals.\\nParadoxically, ideologically similar agents are often opponents. In this paper,\\nideologically heterogeneous agents choose the ideological composition of their\\nneighborhood, their tolerance, and invest into connections. The resulting\\nweighted network describes allies, opponents, and strengths. Disputes with\\nopponents determine benefits, which increase in an agent's strength and\\ncohesion. Cohesive agents have fewer mutual allies with opponents. In\\nequilibrium, the network is segregated when cohesion is effective enough and\\nsome agents tolerate ideologically distant types to oppose closer ones.\\nSubsidizing connections dampens polarization in societies on the verge of\\nsegregation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.14045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.14045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Agents with different ideologies often form alliances to achieve their goals.
Paradoxically, ideologically similar agents are often opponents. In this paper,
ideologically heterogeneous agents choose the ideological composition of their
neighborhood, their tolerance, and invest into connections. The resulting
weighted network describes allies, opponents, and strengths. Disputes with
opponents determine benefits, which increase in an agent's strength and
cohesion. Cohesive agents have fewer mutual allies with opponents. In
equilibrium, the network is segregated when cohesion is effective enough and
some agents tolerate ideologically distant types to oppose closer ones.
Subsidizing connections dampens polarization in societies on the verge of
segregation.